my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Anyone have some 70mm film I could use?

Author Topic: Anyone have some 70mm film I could use? Thomas Procyk Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1842 From: Royal Palm Beach, FL, USA Registered: Feb 2002 posted 09-17-2003 01:54 PM                     Hey all, Our tech doesn't really want to bother with it since we will probably NEVER run 70mm on our Vic8, (we're a sub-run anyway) but if we knew it worked, we could probably book some cool prints for the slower months. Which leads me to the topic. Does anyone have any spare/junk 70mm film that they could loan or give me to test our equipment with? A loop big enough to run through the projector and mag soundhead would be great, but enough to test the platter operation would be even better. Everything looks pretty much in order in regards to the projector, soundhead and the mag preamp, but looks can be decieving. All of the equipment to change over to 70mm is there to my knowledge: rollers, gate, trap, lens, beam spreader, control plates, etc. We even have a pair of Neumade splicers. I'm a newbie to this 70-stuff, so if there are any "surprises" I should look for, let me know. I'd really like to get this stuff up and running again! =TMP=  |  IP: Logged Brad Miller Administrator Posts: 17775 From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall) Registered: May 99 posted 09-17-2003 02:04 PM                     There is a lot more to running 70mm than just converting the projector and sticking film in it. Where most people screw up is not taking into account the difference in gate alignment and tension. I've seen plenty of people convert a 35/70 projector by swapping out pad rollers and such, inserting a beam splitter, focusing and walking away, only to wonder why their films are getting damaged and keep breaking every day. Plus there is the issue of dealing with the magnetic sound tracks, cleaning, demagnatizing and aligning the heads properly. With older 70mm titles, you won't have actual tone and p/n loops from that print, so you'll have to do a lot of it by ear, plus you are dealing with worn tracks in the first place. Did you know you could actually erase a mag track just by randomly running it through a projector that has not been checked out? I'd have to sit down and think through everything that would need to be checked to give a list, and even then it is something you would need to have a truly qualified tech who is well experienced with an excellent 70mm track record (ie: not just any tech) to set it all up and/or train you on how to do it. Remember, you would be running frequently one-of-a-kind prints, the last in existence. If you damaged the print, that's it. There would be no more made. I am told that the studios will charge in the neighborhood of $15,000 a 70mm print vs. $3000 for a 35mm print if you damage it.  |  IP: Logged Thomas Procyk Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1842 From: Royal Palm Beach, FL, USA Registered: Feb 2002 posted 09-17-2003 02:31 PM                     You want to come out and check my 70mm setup, Brad? I didn't know there was so much more to it than just the usual alignment and such. Being that the equipment and soundhead haven't been used in over 10 years makes me wonder about its condition or sensitivity towards prints. When you say that older titles don't have a tone or p/n loop, do you mean that each print came with its own alignment film? Yet another thing I didn't know. Cool! I do know about the volitility (is that a word?) of the magnetic tracks. I'm trained from the old days of exposed floppy disks. You so much as lay them near a phone or on top of the monitor, and you've got data errors. =TMP=  |  IP: Logged Daryl C. W. O'Shea Film God Posts: 3977 From: Midland Ontario Canada (where Panavision & IMAX lenses come from) Registered: Jun 2002 posted 09-17-2003 02:50 PM                        quote: Does anyone have any spare/junk 70mm film that they could loan or give me to test our equipment with? Just tape a pair of 35mm trailers together.  |  IP: Logged Manny Knowles "What are these things and WHY are they BLUE???" Posts: 4247 From: Bloomington, IN, USA Registered: Feb 2002 posted 09-17-2003 04:15 PM                     Brad -- this is very interesting stuff. Any chance of a (QuickTime) show-and-tell? Pleeeeease?  |  IP: Logged Bill Gabel Film God Posts: 3873 From: Technicolor / Postworks NY, USA Registered: Jan 2002 posted 09-17-2003 04:21 PM                     A few years ago, we got a booking to run a 70MM print for a film festival. The had two 70MM houses but had never run 70MM. The head tech for the company just said to build the print up and test reel one of it to see if it works. The projector was a JJ2 and a 5 deck AW3. I had a full reel of 70MM trailers that we used to test it out. We damaged about 100 feet of one of the trailers. If we had used reel 1 of the print to test it we would of damaged a new showprint. As Brad said its more than just converting the projector and platter over to 70MM than you think.  |  IP: Logged Darryl Spicer Film God Posts: 3250 From: Lexington, KY, USA Registered: Dec 2000 posted 09-17-2003 07:08 PM                    you didn't mention if you still had the magnetic preamps for the mag heads. I wouldn't trust the system without it being put through all the test by an experienced 70MM tech. Years ago I was told that the cost for damage was a $1 per foot. That was just for a 70MM release print.  |  IP: Logged Brad Miller Administrator Posts: 17775 From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall) Registered: May 99 posted 09-17-2003 07:32 PM                     Manny, do you have any idea how long that would take to shoot and produce? Even at that, it would only cover one particular projector (and platter) setup. Things like this need to be left in the hands of experienced people. That time will be much better spent on making a video showing how to break down a print, since obviously very few seem to know how to do it right. (Evidenced by all of the masking tape "splices", amongst other things at the depot.)  |  IP: Logged Phil Hill I love my cootie bug Posts: 7595 From: Hollywood, CA USA Registered: Mar 2000 posted 09-17-2003 08:11 PM                  I agree Brad, I'd rather see you produce a video about the proper way to make-up and break-down a print. 70MM is a whole nother world as others have said. I agree with the post about getting an experienced 70mm person to teach you the tricks of the trade. Be observant, ask "sensible" questions, and learn ....then respect not only the format, but the person as well. Putting aside the risk of damaging or destroying some of the last surviving prints, converting the projectors over from 35 to 70mm is NOT as simple as reading the manuals. You could easily damage the projector as well as the print. >>> Phil  |  IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

Printer-friendly view of this topic

Hop To: Select a Forum: Category: Operations -------------------- Digital Cinema Forum Film Handlers' Forum Large Format Forum Ground Level Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets Category: Community -------------------- Film-Yak Film Handlers' Movie Reviews The Afterlife Bob Maar's Joke-A-Thon Category: Classified -------------------- Equipment and Supplies Wanted/For Sale Help Wanted/Seeking Employment Category: System -------------------- Software Beta Testing Forum

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.