|
|
Author
|
Topic: Service... the way it should be!
|
Jack Ondracek
Film God
Posts: 2348
From: Port Orchard, WA, USA
Registered: Oct 2002
|
posted 11-15-2003 09:58 PM
It's easy enough to find reason to bitch in this line of work... and I've never been reluctant to complain with little provocation. Occasionally however, a situation turns out better than I would have expected, and I think that deserves recognition, too.
One of my indoor houses runs on a DA-20 with a CAT-701 reader, running through a CP-65. We've had absolutely flawless performance with this system... not one problem... which I've been impressed with, considering all that I've heard about abrasion in the sprocket area, causing wear, and resultant high error rates on the dolby soundtrack. I figure the Film Guard system is a large part of why the digital has worked so well, but those nagging abrasion issues were partly the reason why I was happy to also have a couple of DTS systems in the house.
Over the past week or so, we'd been having intermittent problems with our DA-20. My daughter, who manages our indoor told me one day that the system was cycling between digital and analog... a problem that was easy to dismiss as being caused by excessive error rates.
Today however, we experienced much the same problem... and it happened while I was running the booth. the automation started the show in digital (format 10), and my CP-65 stayed there... something it won't do if the DA-20 doesn't like what it sees. We had silence until I manually switched into "SR". Eventually, the whole digital system crashed & I had to manually back-up to SR.
OK... check the obvious... the reader's threaded ok... though that wouldn't explain why the DA-20 allowed the system to stay in digital. Off goes the cover, and fault lights are everywhere. Good idiot lights on the power supply (remember this)... I re-seat the cards & socketed ICs... still no luck.
So, having checked everything I can think of, I call the 24/7 Dolby "hotline"... on Saturday night. I get an answering service (crap!), which takes my number & tells me they'll "let someone know". I'm now resigned to running the house in SR through the rest of the weekend. Now, our SR kicks much butt, and I'm not particularly worried about anyone coming out of the auditorium to accuse me of foisting antiquated analog sound on them... but it isn't the best I can normally do, and that does bother me. No doubt, I'll get a call from some "call center nerd", telling me I'll have to pack the box up & send it in for "factory authorized repairs" Freaking Wonderful!
5 minutes later, I get a phone call. It's Ken Jaquart from Dolby. Cool... I'm impressed.
What I didn't expect however, was that it got even better.
I run down the list of what I've observed, and how I tried to fix it. After I tell my "story", Ken blows me away by pointing out the one obvious thing I didn't check... he suggests I take a DVM & check the power supply voltage at the test points. Duh... were it not for those stupid idiot lights, I might have done that. Now, I feel real dumb. However, having checked the voltage & finding it too low, Ken flat nails the problem. A bad Molex connector in the power supply.
Do I get the expected "pack it up and send it in so we "more qualifed than you" guys can fix what you're probably to dumb to do yourself"?... No. I get an intelligent explanation of what he thinks the problem is and what I can do to fix it... IF I'm comfortable going that far...
So... I got the DA-20 out of the rack, pulled the supply, got the Molex connector out, hard-wired the connections & replaced the system before the film ended. Results? We're back to normal... down time, a little over an hour on a Saturday night.
This is the way customer service should be. It's sad that the electronics industry has moved away from component-level troubleshooting, and migrated instead to a "card-exchange" model... which more often than not, merely extends the time required to resolve a problem.
This is the level of service I experienced, without exception, from the late Vern Klingman, a gentleman who I'll always consider one of a declining number of truly excellent technicians who had the ability to visualize a problem on a practical level.
Ken Jacquart rose to a level of service I frankly didn't expect, considering the qualifications of the people who probably call for help more often than not.
Thanks, Ken! I appreciate your service more than you know!
Jack
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stephen Furley
Film God
Posts: 3059
From: Coulsdon, Croydon, England
Registered: May 2002
|
posted 11-16-2003 02:31 PM
Maybe good service is coming back into fashion; I have just had a very good experience with the British Film Institute. I have not had any dealings with them for about fifteen years, and past experience was that they could be difficult to deal with. Things were very different this time.
I wanted to book a print for a private screening in January, if possible on 16mm. On Tuesday, in another thread, I asked Leo if he knew whether the BFI would allow me, as an individual, to book a print; he wasn't sure.
I e-mailed the bookings department and asked them. Within a few minutes I had received a reply from Andrew Youdell. Yes, they had a print, it was in reasonable condition, I could book it, but as I didn't have an account with them I would have to send a cheque in advance. There were no bookings for the print next year, so at was available any date that I wanted it. If I could collect the print from the BFI offices in central London, it would only cost me 50 pounds plus 17.5% tax, 58.75 in total. A couple more e-mails arranged the date etc., and I said I would post the cheque later in the week.
Cheque went in the post late on Wednesday, much too late to catch the last collection, so It would have gone on Thursday, and the BFI should have received it on Friday. Yesterday, Saturday, morning, I received by post confirmation of the booking, and receipt of my cheque.
Well done BFI and Andrew Youdell, excellent service.
Any more tales of good service? Maybe this thread will get as long as the poor film handling one. Well, we can hope.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|