|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
Author
|
Topic: Strange theory about Cap Code
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Frank Angel
Film God
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c6ee7/c6ee749260411f06ec3b8193f6d2fa32c17e03d4" alt=""
Posts: 5305
From: Brooklyn NY USA
Registered: Dec 1999
|
posted 03-15-2004 07:10 AM
College professors....now there's a reliable source of technical information.
Me to a film professor and his students while they were touring the projection booth. "This is an anamorphic lens." Professor: "What's an anamorphic lens?"
In a film class on Fellini, after showing us a pan-&-scan 16mm print of LA DULCE VITA, the professor went on for about ten minutes explaining to us how Fellini, master of symbolism, had imbued the film with subtle statements about how dispensable people and relationships are by composing many of the shots so as to have the characters cut off by the film frame, literally severing them with his camera. He said Fellini used the film frame to "make a key statement about life." Yeah, more like the P&S transfer operator was making a statement about what he could fit into the 16mm 1.33 frame down from a 2.35 scope image.
Rather than embarrass this guy in front of the entire class, I quietly went up to him after class and point out the error of his theory, that this symbolism was not the famed director's doing, but a simple result of a very poor conversion system from the original scope to a frame of a totally different aspect ratio, half the original width. And what's more, showing this bastardized version instead of the original was a great disservice to the class.
By our conversation I realized he had never even seen this great film in a theatre or on 35 mm film and because I was "just a technician" he wasn't buying my explanation for why characters were cut off by the 16 mm frame. By his dismissive attitude, I realize I was talking to a horse's ass.
The jerk indicated that he was going to continue to preach his erronious therory (which very contradictory to how lovingly Fellini treats all his flawed characters). I felt I needed to take this thing in hand and let my fellow film students know the falacy of his theory. For the next two class day's I raised my hand trying to be recognized so I could debate him in front of the class, but the spinless weazel refused to call on me. So att he next class I simply came in before he arrived and explained to the other students what pan & scan was and the real reason characters were sliced by the edge of the film frame.
Stupidity is many times rewarded with tenure and the letters PhD.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|