Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Speaker Suggestions for Auditoriums & Gyms

   
Author Topic: Speaker Suggestions for Auditoriums & Gyms
Joshua Lott
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 246
From: Fairbanks, AK, USA
Registered: Nov 1999


 - posted 03-18-2004 12:22 PM      Profile for Joshua Lott   Author's Homepage   Email Joshua Lott   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I am looking for suggestions on speakers that would work well in theatres (used for plays) and gym's.

I have used and been very happy with Electro-Voice Cinema and Loudspeaker systems.

The set up will include a screen that is 45-60 feet wide. There will be about a 350 person capacity.

The current plans are to go with the typical left, center, right, sub, and surround setup.

Would the QRx153 series work good for the l,c,r?
I was thinking the SL10-2V or the SL12-2V for the surrounds.
And for the subs the TL880D was on my list.

Should I look at another type of speaker? I know JBL is popular, but I have had zero personal experience with them.

Something that I should mention is that this is for a portable setup. So the easier it is to move the better. But I will not sacrifice quality for a lighter or easier to move speaker.

Thanks in advance.

 |  IP: Logged

Gary Crawford
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 200
From: Neptune NJ USA
Registered: Nov 2003


 - posted 03-18-2004 01:18 PM      Profile for Gary Crawford   Email Gary Crawford   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Joshua, there are a lot of speakers and systems out there that will handle auditoriums just fine. Most are good, kind of like whether a Ford or Chevy is better.

The gym venue bothers me a little. Accoustics. They usually backslap noise so badly. Echoes echoes and more echoes. Ever watch a high school basketball game and try to make out what the announcer was saying? Almost impossible. True, a room full of bodies will absorb some sound, but I'm thinking bare block walls, polished wood floor, open steel truss ceiling, and all sorts of other audio hazards. You might have to hire someone to scope this out for you.

 |  IP: Logged

Joshua Lott
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 246
From: Fairbanks, AK, USA
Registered: Nov 1999


 - posted 03-18-2004 01:48 PM      Profile for Joshua Lott   Author's Homepage   Email Joshua Lott   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I am thinking of creating an "auditorium" inside the gym.

Think creating walls or half walls using fabric. Suggestions?

 |  IP: Logged

Scott Norwood
Film God

Posts: 8146
From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas)
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 03-18-2004 01:58 PM      Profile for Scott Norwood   Author's Homepage   Email Scott Norwood   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Depending on how bad the gym is, you might actually be better off running a high-quality mono setup (full-range with A/SR noise reduction, as appropriate). Most gyms are really bad acoustically and multi-channel systems are liable to make this worse. Mono can be made to sound very good, even though it usually doesn't in practice.

Do you really want a 60-foot wide screen for 350 seats? That sounds unusually large. I'd think that 25-30 feet might be more appropriate.

To answer the original question: I agree it's an issue of personal taste. The acoustics of the room and the tweaking of the system seem to make a huge difference, too. I've heard great-sounding systems that used anything from EV to JBL to Altec to other brands, and crappy systems that used all of those brands, too.

 |  IP: Logged

Joshua Lott
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 246
From: Fairbanks, AK, USA
Registered: Nov 1999


 - posted 03-18-2004 02:05 PM      Profile for Joshua Lott   Author's Homepage   Email Joshua Lott   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Scott,

I am trying to go "a little larger" then normal. But I do not want to over do it. Giving the audience something more to talk about. I am trying to keep the sound and picture professional, and I do not want it to look or sound like it is just thrown together.

I will be setting up in a local school gym before I fly to these locations for a "live" run.

The thought is to create an event. Something to keep them talking. Would a 40 foot wide screen be more to what I am looking for?

Would you say that dropping the surrounds in the gyms more appropiate and just running the 3 stages in mono? What about the sub?

I have no experience in set up's in gyms. What other things can I do to help with the acoustics?

 |  IP: Logged

Paul Mayer
Oh get out of it Melvin, before it pulls you under!

Posts: 3836
From: Albuquerque, NM
Registered: Feb 2000


 - posted 03-18-2004 03:54 PM      Profile for Paul Mayer   Author's Homepage   Email Paul Mayer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Gyms are going to be a real problem. As has been mentioned, all those hard surfaces will produce multiple echos that will be hell on intelligibility.

If you're not going to use the entire space anyway, perhaps you can carry enough pipe and drape on the truck to section off and acoustically deaden your seating area. If you can dampen your space down, you should have a good shot at achieving decent stereo.

Stereo in such a live room tends to be a mess, again due to all the reflections. And multiple-speaker mono will generally be just as bad for the same reasons. For really live rooms it's usually best to go with as close to a single point source for your sound as possible. If you decide you're going to do this project in good mono, I'd recommend building just a single center stage speaker stack instead of the L, C, R three. That will noticeably improve intelligibility.

 |  IP: Logged

Matt Zeiner
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 146
From: Windsor, CT USA
Registered: Sep 2003


 - posted 03-18-2004 05:54 PM      Profile for Matt Zeiner   Email Matt Zeiner   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The problem of deadening the space with respect to high frequencies is easily solved as suggested, by drapes. Unfortunately the RT at lower frequecies will remain unaffected. I would definately keep it simple here - front-surround can sound very good in extremely live rooms. Forget about the sub - it will cause more problems than it will be worth. my 2 cents.

 |  IP: Logged

Kenneth Wuepper
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1026
From: Saginaw, MI, USA
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 03-21-2004 11:00 PM      Profile for Kenneth Wuepper   Email Kenneth Wuepper   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The Baseball Analogy:

By placing the Booth at home plate and the screen at second base, there are essentially no parallel and opposing surfaces in that room as you are using it. The highs can be reduced from bouncing off the walls between third base and home plate as well as home and first base.

Surrounds may be very effective in the two corners of the newly created space. (EG first and third bases)

The natural amplification of the corner speakers will reduce the amount of amplification needed. Only 2 surround sources could be very effective in that kind of space.

I am thinking that you want to make this a "Portable Cinema". This technique will make it possible to troup the least amount of equipment for the job.

 |  IP: Logged

David M. Dorn
Film Handler

Posts: 35
From: Hartford, CT USA
Registered: Mar 2004


 - posted 03-28-2004 12:50 AM      Profile for David M. Dorn   Email David M. Dorn   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Check out the Frazier loudspeaker web site. They have a paper on loudspeakers for Gysms. The link to the web site is:
http://www.frazierspeakers.com/
The paper on Gym applications is in the Technical Doucuments section of their website.

 |  IP: Logged

Tony Bandiera Jr
Film God

Posts: 3067
From: Moreland Idaho
Registered: Apr 2004


 - posted 04-14-2004 02:00 PM      Profile for Tony Bandiera Jr   Email Tony Bandiera Jr   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Joshua:
A suggestion that I've used for an outdoor show (40' screen and over 2,000 people) is to run the "Hearing Impaired" output from your cinema processor as your single stage channel. The Dolby CP-65, 500 and 650 have this output. It combines the l, c, and r signals so you don't lose any information. I flanked the screen with two speaker arrays outdoors, but you should place your speaker(s) centered. Try using two cabinets with the same feed placed as close together as possible and flared out at a slight angle.
Subs would probably not be a good idea....too much slap.
Screen size of 40-60' would require a 4kw Xenon...and three-phase power for the rectifier. A gain screen of 20-30' would work with a 2kw xenon and single phase power with a switching rectifier. That is the setup I use indoors.
Feel free to email me if you have any specific questions.

 |  IP: Logged

Frank Angel
Film God

Posts: 5305
From: Brooklyn NY USA
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 04-17-2004 06:14 AM      Profile for Frank Angel   Author's Homepage   Email Frank Angel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I ran into this acoustical nightmare problem quite a number of years ago and did the usual cover-everything-in-site-with-24lb-velour method of echo abatement and when that didn't work, especially for the incredible booming low frequency resonance, we put in big sound absorbing cylinders made by rolling up 6in sound insulation sheets and stuffing them into fishnet "socks" and hung them in the corners and the back and side walls. Yet with all that, it remained quite a frightening space. Of particular freakishness were the bleachers which were constructed with hundreds of moveable metal parts, all of them mechanically joined in a rather loose fashion, causing them to vibrate with any low frequency sound below 300hz. They created a kind of metallically snare drum sound all their own that emanated from all around you like circle surround. Bodies helped, but not enough to make any difference (and of course, at the door, each patron was handed the special 24lb velour overcoats which they were required to wear).

And after all this treatment, and a myriad of different speaker placement schemes, speech intelligibility in the room remained....well, let's just say, there wasn't any speech intelligibility! You might as well have been running foreign films without benefit of subtitles.

Then there was that unusually high ambient noise level -- a kind of low frequency rumble -- that seemed rise just after some dialogue and fall when no dialogue was present. We finally traced that down: it was the constant murmur of 300, 400 people saying in a low tone under their breath, "What did he say?"...."What did she say?"

In the end we all agreed that about the only solution that made any sense in that venue was to just program foreign films (subtitled) and of course, all the great silent classics!

I might be exaggerating a bit, but not by much, Josh, not by much.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)  
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.