my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Gaumont-Kalee Model 20 - Takeup Spoolbox

Author Topic: Gaumont-Kalee Model 20 - Takeup Spoolbox Mark T Eccles Film Handler Posts: 4 From: York, North Yorkshire, England Registered: Apr 2004 posted 04-10-2004 09:12 AM                     Hello, I am renovating a GK-20, and have managed to get film running. The picture is fantastic! However, I think I've chained the takeup spoolbox to the soundhead casting incorrectly, because the film is taken up quicker than the projector feeds it out. This subsequently leads to the film snapping. I've tried altering the chain path, and varying the loop sizes, but it doesn't stop the problem. Could anyone please suggest a solution? Many Thanks, Mark  |  IP: Logged Gordon McLeod Film God Posts: 9532 From: Toronto Ontario Canada Registered: Jun 99 posted 04-10-2004 12:42 PM                     Sounds like a takeup clutch issue that needs adjustment  |  IP: Logged Howard Johnson Film Handler Posts: 87 From: Felpham , West Sussex, UK Registered: Jun 99 posted 04-10-2004 01:47 PM                     Mark, if it's any help we have a GK20 on display in the foyer of the Dome cinema in Worthing. It's on loan from the projected picture trust. I am working next tuesday and could have a look for you at the take-uo assembly if you contact me.  |  IP: Logged Dan Lyons Jedi Master Film Handler Posts: 698 From: Seal Beach, CA Registered: Sep 2002 posted 04-10-2004 03:01 PM                     quote: I think I've chained the takeup spoolbox to the soundhead casting incorrectly, because the film is taken up quicker than the projector feeds it out. This subsequently leads to the film snapping ohh jeez.... please tell me that you're just using junk trailers and such... Why would you even run film without first using a scale to measure the amount of tension the feed and takeup? danny  |  IP: Logged Mark T Eccles Film Handler Posts: 4 From: York, North Yorkshire, England Registered: Apr 2004 posted 04-10-2004 04:52 PM                     Hello, Thanks very much for the suggestions, guys. I've varied the tension of the chain, but the problem seems to be with the ratio between the soundhead gearing and the bottom spoolbox gearing, making the takeup too fast for the projector output. The soundhead gearing requires the chain to go through it in a certain way, in order to provide the critical gear-to-gear ratio between itself and the bottom takeup gearing. Unfortunately, there isn't a clutch mechanism installed, so that chain speed is crucial! Any ideas as to the correct setup would be very gratefully appreciated. With Kind Regards, Mark  |  IP: Logged Richard Fowler Film God Posts: 2392 From: Ft. Lauderdale, FL, USA Registered: Jun 2001 posted 04-10-2004 05:36 PM                     Sorry there has to be a clutch to allow for slippage and changing diameter of the take-up roll. The average rpm can average 75 at the hub of a 2000' reel and more like 20 with a full reel.  |  IP: Logged Phil Hill I love my cootie bug Posts: 7595 From: Hollywood, CA USA Registered: Mar 2000 posted 04-10-2004 11:05 PM                  Mark, as a chemist that claims to be interested in technology, try this “experiment” to illustrate Richard’s explanation and post. Outdoors, on a long straight road, mount a 2000ft reel full of film on a spindle. Have your wife/girlfriend/boyfriend/dog/neighbor/whatever take the end of the film and start running down the road at about 1.03 mph (90fpm). Notice that as the films is peeled away the reel turns faster and faster...it does NOT turn at a constant speed even though the film is being removed at a constant linear rate. Thus, SOME sort of “clutch” or variable-speed, constant torque drive is necessary to allow for the changing reel RPM as the film is built on the reel. Your chain drive is a “hard” constant-speed drive and no amount of fussing with the chain tension will correct your basic problem.. get a clutch...and a grip. >>> Phil  |  IP: Logged Mark Gulbrandsen Resident Trollmaster Posts: 16657 From: Music City Registered: Jun 99 posted 04-10-2004 11:20 PM                     All of the Kalees that I've had down here and came from Canada, some via Gord, were belt drive take up. Many lower spool boxes had magnetic clutches fitted on them. The others had a simple friction type clutch which is the most common type of clutch for feed/takeup spool boxes. Your upper spool box more than likely has a friction type clutch on it and the bottom one ALSO HAS to have a clutch to work properly. I always thought they were beautifully constructed machines with the fit and finish of a fine watch...... Mark  |  IP: Logged Mark T Eccles Film Handler Posts: 4 From: York, North Yorkshire, England Registered: Apr 2004 posted 04-11-2004 06:07 AM                     Hello, Thanks for the advice chaps. At the crack of dawn, I went to investigate the bottom takeup (it was a bit easier to arrange than the road-running experiment, but that did indeed confirm my suspicions!) All your advice pointed to the existence of a clutch, and I'm rather red-faced to admit that after a good twist of the shaft, I discovered there is indeed a clutch there! My only excuse is that this machine, as you suggested Mark, is so well designed that the clutch is quite well hidden from view! I've only just added this spoolbox, as at the Student Cinema where the projector was previously used, they had a Westrex tower and had attached a simple bracket and roller at the bottom, en route to the tower system. I'm just amazed, having worked with Victoria 5, 8 and 9 projectors, how steady and crisp the picture is from this old but sturdy workhorse. I'm using a 500 watt halogen floodlamp as the 'lamphouse', which doesn't give a brilliant focussed beam of light at the aperture, but is sufficiently bright nonetheless, gives a good colour temperature, and is cheaper than a xenon! OK, must now try running some film through it (old stock for starters). Watch this space! With many thanks for the advice. Best Wishes, Mark  |  IP: Logged Phil Hill I love my cootie bug Posts: 7595 From: Hollywood, CA USA Registered: Mar 2000 posted 04-11-2004 06:13 AM                  Mark E... >>> Phil  |  IP: Logged Mark Gulbrandsen Resident Trollmaster Posts: 16657 From: Music City Registered: Jun 99 posted 04-11-2004 06:20 AM                     Mark, Although some techs may disagree I think the Kalee 19, 20, and 21 are some of the finest machines ever made. Perhaps a bit unorthadox to service some pints of the machine, but none the less the build quality from a machinists point of view puts just about every other projector to shame excepting the Phillips stuff. The Kalee is the only projector I've ever seen with a hand scraped mainframe surface.... The fact that they would bother to do that tells me alot.... Enjoy the machine!!! Mark  |  IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

Printer-friendly view of this topic

Hop To: Select a Forum: Category: Operations -------------------- Digital Cinema Forum Film Handlers' Forum Large Format Forum Ground Level Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets Category: Community -------------------- Film-Yak Film Handlers' Movie Reviews The Afterlife Bob Maar's Joke-A-Thon Category: Classified -------------------- Equipment and Supplies Wanted/For Sale Help Wanted/Seeking Employment Category: System -------------------- Software Beta Testing Forum

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.