Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Running 3-D without selsyn motors (Page 1)

 
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
Author Topic: Running 3-D without selsyn motors
Jeff Joseph
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 131
From: Palmdale, CA, USA
Registered: Jun 2000


 - posted 04-15-2004 08:33 PM      Profile for Jeff Joseph   Author's Homepage   Email Jeff Joseph   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I'm now running 3-D without selsyn motors... and it works great! I'm posting this so that others know there is a way to do this... and to see if I'm missing something and doing something wrong.

We have 2 V-4's; been running 3-D with selsyn motors, no problem. One motor burned out. Replaced it. Turned out the new motor was faster than the old motor, so had to replace both motors. Now I have 2 new synchronous motors. But we're running them non-synchronous and using the selsyns, no problem.

But now I notice that we're running a little fast, so we switch the motors to synchronous and add some speed controllers. Tweek the controllers so I'm running 24fps... and now I can't use the selsyns. Why? Both speed controllers have to be exactly the same speed... and they're not. Even if both displays say, for example, 57.8, one might be 57.81 and the other one might be 57.82. No way to make them perfectly the same. So the selsyns have to work way too hard and they heat up.

So I call Chapin at Boston Light and Sound. He suggests we run both projectors off one controller (after making sure the controller can indeed handle the current of 2 motors). We install a relay/switch, so when running 2-D, each projector works off one controller. We switch to 3-D, now both projectors work off one controller.

We still have a start switch that turns on both projectors at the exact same moment. So: We set the phase at the same point on both projectors. Then push "start".... both projectors start to run... they stay in sync as they are both seeing the same exact frequency.

And, of course, this would work even if we were not using a speed controller. Both projectors would see the 60 Hz and stay in sync that way.

So: It works. I've run a feature film in double system interlock and it stayed in perfect sync. But it just feels wrong somehow not having the selsyns on.

Am I missing something?

Thanks,

Jeff

 |  IP: Logged

Floyd Justin Newton
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 559
From: Phoenix, Arizona, USA
Registered: Jun 2002


 - posted 04-15-2004 08:56 PM      Profile for Floyd Justin Newton   Email Floyd Justin Newton   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Jeff--

What are you missing? You're doing something correctly. Why
worry? It's working!
[Wink]

fjn
Local 294 Ret.

 |  IP: Logged

Richard Fowler
Film God

Posts: 2392
From: Ft. Lauderdale, FL, USA
Registered: Jun 2001


 - posted 04-15-2004 08:57 PM      Profile for Richard Fowler   Email Richard Fowler   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
No, not missing anything. Selsyn control can be brutal at start up with normal motors, less so with sync motors in their effort to lock in. You have identical sync motors on machines with the same load factors and film passage so the motor "slippage" should be nil under the crystal frequency control of the invertor control....with a normal sync motor with four poles it should have 5 reference points to phase to per film frame.....dissimilar machines would probably be another story.

 |  IP: Logged

Andrew Lee
Film Handler

Posts: 99
From: Oakville, Ontario, Canada
Registered: Jun 2002


 - posted 04-15-2004 11:29 PM      Profile for Andrew Lee   Email Andrew Lee   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Jeff, I know that feeling your talking about. Just run with it for the time being. Take a close look at the credits at the very end of your presentation. If they jive.....you're on the way.

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Kraus
Film God

Posts: 4094
From: Chicago, IL, USA
Registered: May 2000


 - posted 04-16-2004 12:16 AM      Profile for Steve Kraus     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Eh...a really big timing belt..er...make that a roller chain between machines. SH-1000's would be great for this. [Eek!]

And, of course, this would work even if we were not using a speed controller. Both projectors would see the 60 Hz and stay in sync that way.

Perhaps. But I'd wager there would be a greater chance that the two motors would come up to synchronous speed slightly differently. Remember you'd be throwing them suddenly on 60Hz and they'd not be in sync at first, just trying really hard to get there. With an inverter drive ramping them up from zero they are under full control from the moment you hit start and never given a brief moment to do their own thing.

 |  IP: Logged

Jeff Joseph
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 131
From: Palmdale, CA, USA
Registered: Jun 2000


 - posted 04-16-2004 12:29 AM      Profile for Jeff Joseph   Author's Homepage   Email Jeff Joseph   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
So most theatres have sync motors nowadays, correct?

At least in those theatres (and that have 2 projectors and can run 6000' loads...and have a silver screen)... all you need to set up for 3-D is a switch to start both projectors at the same time....no need to install selsyns...maybe a few more theatres will set up for double system 3-D.... well, one can hope.

Just as an FYI, as far as I know, there are only 5 theatres in the entire USA currently set up for interlock 3-D:

Castro, San Francisco
Music Box, Chicago
Film Forum, NYC
Lafayette, Suffern NY
Charles Theatre, Baltimore

Jeff

 |  IP: Logged

Pete Naples
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1565
From: Dunfermline, Scotland
Registered: Feb 2001


 - posted 04-16-2004 02:52 AM      Profile for Pete Naples   Email Pete Naples   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
How well does it work, as surely your two projectors are raked and toe'd in to achieve alignment?

I've installed 2 projector 3D system in the past, these were custom built Balantyne Pro35's with micrometer adjustable lens mounts, which means that the optical centres of both machines were pointing flat and perpendicular to the sheet, the picture alignment being achieve by shifting the lens off axis. Hence nop keystone distortion and hence the 3D works very very well.

Those mechs also have stepper motor drive, via Strongs SV automation, synch'd to SMPTE timcode. The accuracy of synchronisation over a days of showing the same film 4 times and hour is truly astonishing.

 |  IP: Logged

Bill Carter
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 162
From: Minneapolis, Minnesota
Registered: Sep 1999


 - posted 04-16-2004 04:17 AM      Profile for Bill Carter   Email Bill Carter   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Add the Oak Street Cinema in Minneapolis to your list of interlock and silver screen equipped theaters. They've run the new dual prints of both Kiss Me Kate and House of Wax within the last year or so.

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 04-16-2004 07:38 AM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Jeff,

Steve is correct...just having sync motors is not sufficient for reliable 3-D operation...the absolutely need to be controlled by the same controller, not hit with a 60Hz line frequency and hope the motor and loading are exact enough to bring them up to speed frame-for-frame.

Are your sync motors 3-phase? That is how the motor controller can really ramp both up at the same time.

It is true that once up to speed, ordinary sync motors driven off of the same line frequency will run turn-for-turn. Anyone that has done interlock know this...they also know that upon start up, film accumulators move a little bit too.

As to your 2-strip 3-D list...

The AFI Theatre at the Kennedy Center in Washington DC is capable and has run many performances. They use the selsyn method.

The AFI/Silver theatre in Silver Spring, MD is a bit more impressive in its ability...in the Historic theatre, they have four projectors. Each pair of projectors can run together and each pair can changeover to the other. The only thing they lack is the silver screen. So they are 3-D ready but not completely done.

The National Archives II in Greenbelt, MD has two systems that are also 3-D capable. The systems were set up for side-by-side viewing of two different prints of the same title but they too are only a silver screen away from 3-D capability.

Steve

 |  IP: Logged

Carl Martin
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1424
From: Oakland, CA, USA
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 04-16-2004 08:02 AM      Profile for Carl Martin   Author's Homepage   Email Carl Martin   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
the castro theater replaced their silver screen (with non-silver) to get more even illumination, so they're not quite there anymore.

a few years ago the stanford theater in palo alto was showing 3-d. don't know if they're still capable.

quote:
The AFI/Silver theatre in Silver Spring, MD ... The only thing they lack is the silver screen.
too tired to think of punchline.

carl

 |  IP: Logged

Scott Norwood
Film God

Posts: 8146
From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas)
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 04-16-2004 08:14 AM      Profile for Scott Norwood   Author's Homepage   Email Scott Norwood   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Steve--could Williamsburg do 3D now, assuming that they put in a silver screen? I would hope that at least the Kinotons in the screening room would be capable.

 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 04-16-2004 08:45 AM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Doesn't optimal 3D viewing also require that the two shutters be in phase also? --- i.e., that they open and close at exactly the same time.

 |  IP: Logged

Mitchell Dvoskin
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1869
From: West Milford, NJ, USA
Registered: Jan 2001


 - posted 04-16-2004 10:58 AM      Profile for Mitchell Dvoskin   Email Mitchell Dvoskin   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Yes, both shutters must be in phase. This is usually done by spinning the motor by hand on each projector prior to threading.

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 04-16-2004 12:19 PM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
At the AFI - Kennedy Center we have marked the motor flywheels in quadrents to allow for the shutters to also be in sync with each other.

As to Williamsburg, no...they are not 3-D capable. The screen isn't a Silver (heck they are only using 700-watts as it is) and the projectors do not have the necessary 3-D interlock electronics to allow them to track with one another.

Steve

 |  IP: Logged

Gordon McLeod
Film God

Posts: 9532
From: Toronto Ontario Canada
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 04-16-2004 12:55 PM      Profile for Gordon McLeod   Email Gordon McLeod   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The best method is to use a servo controled motor on each projector with a shaftencoder telling the drive its position and the shutters will stay in sync
A sync motor by itself can be hit and miss due to sync speed is reached after the run up and that will vary depending on the load of the machine
Also your VIc4's would like a slow ramp up to full speed to protect the gear train and without servo interlock a slow start would through the sync off

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.