my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Prints winding smoother than others.

Author Topic: Prints winding smoother than others. Thomas Procyk Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1842 From: Royal Palm Beach, FL, USA Registered: Feb 2002 posted 06-02-2004 09:26 AM                     Okay, this has been bothering me for some time now, so I figured I'd ask here. I'm running Cinemeccanica V5's (and one V8) with AW3 platters and Irwin Citation seats with GCC/Pepsi cupholders. I noticed that, while all prints wind "smooth" in the sense that they lay flat on the platter evenly and there are no edges higher than the others, some prints wind incredibly smooth. For example, with the typical print sitting on the platter if you were to run your hand along the top it would feel smooth, but still a little bit "groovy" like those formica countertops or the surface of an old (78) record. If you were to curve your fingers and run the tips along the top, you'd hear that "weeeeek" sound like scratching a record. However, a few prins that we had recently were winding incredibly smooth. Running your hand along these would feel like glass. Completely flat with no groovyness. (this happens on all platters, all decks. The "problem" follows the print) If you do the curved finger trick, there's no scratching sound. It's as if the entire print was a single solid circular mass and not a roll of film. Now, the titles: Texas Chainsaw Massacre, Butterfly Effect and Lord of the Rings --- all New Line, all FUJI stock! The only other one that did this was Monster from NewMarket, and I'm not sure what stock that was on but I don't recall it being Kodak. So what's the story? Is fujifilm thinner than Kodak or other stocks? I think it would be hard to believe that film is cut within a few micrometers difference... (this stuff has to be exact, no?) Anyone else having this same anomaly? I never had it happen on other equipment, prints just wind normally, but these AW3's sure do wind them smooooth! Unless it's a change in film stocks. Just curious. =TMP=  |  IP: Logged Dean Kollet Jedi Master Film Handler Posts: 591 From: Florida State University Registered: Jul 2003 posted 06-02-2004 11:13 AM                     I've noticed this as well, the smooothest being an film from India we screened a few weeks ago (It didn't even feel like film). I'm not too sure about the Irwin Citation seats, but the GCC/Pepsi cupholders might have something to do with it  |  IP: Logged Jeremy Fuentes Mmmm, Dr. Pepper! Posts: 1168 From: Corpus Christi, TX United States Registered: Jan 2004 posted 06-02-2004 11:25 AM                     You have cupholders on your platters, wow!!  |  IP: Logged John Pytlak Film God Posts: 9987 From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922 Registered: Jan 2000 posted 06-02-2004 12:35 PM                        Generally, added surface roughness helps reduce static issues.  |  IP: Logged Jeremy Fuentes Mmmm, Dr. Pepper! Posts: 1168 From: Corpus Christi, TX United States Registered: Jan 2004 posted 06-02-2004 12:41 PM                     So, its a static and platter issue, and not a film stock issue?  |  IP: Logged John Pytlak Film God Posts: 9987 From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922 Registered: Jan 2000 posted 06-02-2004 12:49 PM                        Controlled surface roughness can be used as a tool to help control static. "Glass-like" smooth surfaces tend to be more prone to laps sticking. As a real world example, did you ever try to separate two pieces of plate glass or glass microscope slides that were stuck together?  |  IP: Logged Jeremy Fuentes Mmmm, Dr. Pepper! Posts: 1168 From: Corpus Christi, TX United States Registered: Jan 2004 posted 06-02-2004 12:57 PM                     So its a preference for the film not to take-up as smooth as glass on the platter.  |  IP: Logged Thomas Procyk Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1842 From: Royal Palm Beach, FL, USA Registered: Feb 2002 posted 06-02-2004 01:33 PM                     I'm not talking about the image area of the picture, as would be the case of John's example with the glass or slides sticking together. I'm talking about the edge of the print, as it's wound on the platter. The "surface" being the top of the print as it lays flat. Does Kodak pour sand into the mix of polyester to control static then? =TMP=  |  IP: Logged John Pytlak Film God Posts: 9987 From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922 Registered: Jan 2000 posted 06-02-2004 01:50 PM                        quote: Thomas Procyk Does Kodak pour sand into the mix of polyester to control static then? Not sand, but something known as "matte" is in the formula for most films to deliberately increase microscopic surface roughness. Matte also helps control sticking and ferrotyping. The other downside to a "glass like" sidewall roll surface is that on a normal platter, the roll may slide around more easily. I recall some theatres were having issues with LOTR: LOTR Issues  |  IP: Logged Brad Miller Administrator Posts: 17775 From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall) Registered: May 99 posted 06-02-2004 06:43 PM                     You can control this on AW3 platters. It has to do with the fine adjustment of the slide bar. Loosen your allen head (or change out your bolts to allen head) so that the bar is snug, but still moveable. Start a film running onto the top platter. Adjust the bar upward until you see the film is no longer laying on the platter, then ever so slowly lower the bar a tiny bit at a time until the print lays flat and smooth. Then repeat for the lower two decks, only lowering if there is a problem. That is how the last roller SHOULD be set on a platter. Unfortunately too many crappy platter designs do not permit this fine adjustment and platter scratches as well as other little things such as the film "scooping up dust" on the deck become a potential problem. Basically due to the curve of the film, if that last roller feeding the film onto the platter is a little bit lower than center, it causes that effect. Fuji film tends to be a little more slick and as such isn't affected as much. Also, takeup tension affects this. Higher takeup tension exaggerates the roughness of the wind. If you buff your platters (in the tips section), you will be amazed at the quality of the wind. Probably more important than any of this though is getting rid of Pepsi and selling Coke.  |  IP: Logged Thomas Procyk Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1842 From: Royal Palm Beach, FL, USA Registered: Feb 2002 posted 06-02-2004 07:28 PM                     So Brad, you're saying the smooooooth wind is good or bad? Sounds like your tip is to MAKE the winds that smooth. I've checked all our platters recently and all seem to be fine in the adjustment department (everything else winds normal except the Fuji prints, which wind smoother.) Our rollers are old and wobbly (no, they wont replace them) but they don't seem to affect the wind, just the payout. Oh and we DO sell Coke. They got mad at the Pepsi cupholders. So we told them to provide us with free Coke cupholders to replace them. That's the last we heard about that topic. =TMP=  |  IP: Logged John Pytlak Film God Posts: 9987 From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922 Registered: Jan 2000 posted 06-02-2004 08:21 PM                        You want a smooth and even wind from the platter. But you don't want the surface of the film itself so smooth ("glass like") that the roll can slide around.  |  IP: Logged Brad Miller Administrator Posts: 17775 From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall) Registered: May 99 posted 06-02-2004 08:49 PM                     Yes, I go for the super smooth wind. I don't have any scientific data to back up my preference, but the prints definitely do wind tighter and the payout arm is amazingly steady when the prints wind that even. John, with AW3 platters either being buffed or scratched to hell and back, the smoothness of the wind does not affect the print sliding around. Having a slightly rough/textured deck will go far beyond what a filmstock can do.  |  IP: Logged John Pytlak Film God Posts: 9987 From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922 Registered: Jan 2000 posted 06-02-2004 09:47 PM                        Unfortunately, some platter decks are rather slick, or get that way with use.  |  IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

Printer-friendly view of this topic

Hop To: Select a Forum: Category: Operations -------------------- Digital Cinema Forum Film Handlers' Forum Large Format Forum Ground Level Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets Category: Community -------------------- Film-Yak Film Handlers' Movie Reviews The Afterlife Bob Maar's Joke-A-Thon Category: Classified -------------------- Equipment and Supplies Wanted/For Sale Help Wanted/Seeking Employment Category: System -------------------- Software Beta Testing Forum

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.