my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Unstable Century Gate Tension (Page 1)

This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2

Author Topic: Unstable Century Gate Tension Steve Scott Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1300 From: Minneapolis, MN Registered: Sep 2000 posted 07-08-2004 01:53 PM                     One of my Century SA-TM's has been losing focus when splices run through the gate. The focus problem looks like the left and right areas of the screen are shifting in and out of focus, but often times this goes away when another splice runs through the machine, but does occasionally come back after other splices. I'm pretty sure that this has to do with the gate tension, as the tension knob has to be turned to the six-o'clock position in order to have any on screen stability... What part of the gate might need to be replaced? Is it something in the tension control or is it something else like the gate rails? Other info: The turret has been checked and it is stable, all set screws tightened, and lenses are both tight in their rings. There is no penthouse soundhead as this is an analog house. The same problem exists with both flat and scope films.  |  IP: Logged John Hawkinson Film God Posts: 2273 From: Cambridge, MA, USA Registered: Feb 2002 posted 07-10-2004 12:11 AM                     Speculating here, but perhaps the spring on the lateral guide above the gate? Can you successfully thread it in the out of focus state if you try? Or make the problem happen with junk film, and then shut down the projector and look and see if the film is misaligned with respect to the focal plane? --jhawk  |  IP: Logged Brad Miller Administrator Posts: 17775 From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall) Registered: May 99 posted 07-10-2004 12:20 AM                     Try making your upper loop 1-2 perforations larger. The SA curved gate is happiest when the loop "bends backwards" over the top of the gate a little bit. It prevents the film from cupping as it enters the gate, which can knock your sides out of focus. Assuming your bands are in good condition as is the tension spring adjustment at the top of the trap (doubtful if you have been running it at 6:00), odds are you need to lower that tension back to 12:00 and readjust things so the gate closes a little bit farther into the trap enough to produce a steady image and no more at 12:00. Then fine tune your tension adjustment from there. That'll get you in the ballpark.  |  IP: Logged Jack Ondracek Film God Posts: 2348 From: Port Orchard, WA, USA Registered: Oct 2002 posted 07-10-2004 12:36 AM                        Has anyone been messing with your studio guides? Getting them too tight can do that. Vern Klingman used to recommend that the guides be adjusted outward so they weren't used. His thought was that if it was good enough for an XL, a Century ought to work that way, too. I tried it once, but wasn't happy with the image stability & put it back... which makes me wonder how an XL does do it......  |  IP: Logged Mark Gulbrandsen Resident Trollmaster Posts: 16657 From: Music City Registered: Jun 99 posted 07-10-2004 08:21 AM                     Vern was right! I always removed the studio gudes on a Century. They do absolutely nothing and can make cleaning the trap a pain in the butt. Never had any steadiness problems either as Steve K. will attest to. He owns a pair of my ex- dailies machines. My Centurys have been on a gazillion film jobs projecting dailies and they were always dead steady. Mark  |  IP: Logged Steve Scott Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1300 From: Minneapolis, MN Registered: Sep 2000 posted 07-10-2004 09:32 AM                     Brad, I've tried various loop sizes (up to the point of what I'd consider the maximum) and we still get the same effect. Jack, Aside from cranking up the tension, nobody has attempted anything with this machine. I will look at how far the trap closes today, and see about removing the studio guides while I have time.  |  IP: Logged Dominic Espinosa Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1172 From: California, U.S.A. Registered: Jan 2004 posted 07-10-2004 11:18 AM                     I had a problem with that on an SAW a while back. If memory serves the preassure straps were just in bad shape. I replaced them and readjusted the gate so that it closes a little further back. Currently the tensioner is at 12 0'clock and all is well.  |  IP: Logged Jack Ondracek Film God Posts: 2348 From: Port Orchard, WA, USA Registered: Oct 2002 posted 07-11-2004 12:56 AM                        quote: Mark Gulbrandsen Vern was right! I always removed the studio gudes on a Century. Thanks for the input, Mark. I'll work with that some more when I find the time. It was an intriguing concept... but I had (have) too much on my plate to really get into it at present. Sounds like the guides are compensating for another problem somewhere. quote: Steve Scott Jack, Aside from cranking up the tension, nobody has attempted anything with this machine. Then, unless there's some gunk in there you haven't found, don't mess with the guides on my recommendation. Mark backing up what Vern told me adds a lot of credibility to the idea, but unless you have a gauge or metal film strip to put the guides back if you decide to, it might be best to look elsewhere for the problem... especially if it worked OK before. Unless they've been messed with, they won't get tighter on their own. On the other hand, if someone's pulled the trap assembly out... maybe for cleaning?... and jarred or dropped it (loose screws?), it's possible the guides could have been moved accidentally.  |  IP: Logged Mark Gulbrandsen Resident Trollmaster Posts: 16657 From: Music City Registered: Jun 99 posted 07-11-2004 01:24 AM                     I do have a custom Century gate alignment trap that I use. Its much like the standard Century gauge of years past but was made far more accurately by a die maker friend from tool steel. With this gauge I'm able to achieve steadiness out of a Century that is amazing. Steve K. I'm sure will attest to that. Careful alignment of the lateral guide roller and keeping new bands in it are two key things that have to be right for it to work as flawless as possible. Steel film might be another possibility but the gauge actually refrences the edge of the intermittent sprocket to the fixed edge of the guide roller minus about two ten thousandths of an inch to compensate for acetate lateral shrinkage. Dailies are normally still printed on acetate far as I know. Dick Prather also has one of these gauges..... the only other one like this. One other thing to set properly on an SA is the clearance(penetration depth of the gate into the trap). This should be .25 inch measured between the flat plate that the curved runner is mounted to and the outer studio guide. I carry one guide in my tool kit specifically for this purpose. With the 4 gate operating assy screws loose and the gate in the closed position put the .25" drill bit in between and runner plate and the studio guide, then Slide the entire gate assy. back into the trap allowing it to hold the bit in between the plate and guide. Tighten the four screws down while you or someone else holds it this way. Mark  |  IP: Logged John Pytlak Film God Posts: 9987 From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922 Registered: Jan 2000 posted 07-11-2004 07:43 AM                        quote: Mark Gulbrandsen Dailies are normally still printed on acetate far as I know All color print film from the three major film manufacturers is now polyester base, including that used for dailies and answer prints.  |  IP: Logged Mark Gulbrandsen Resident Trollmaster Posts: 16657 From: Music City Registered: Jun 99 posted 07-11-2004 09:20 AM                     Thanks John for that clarification. Its been ay least 5 years since I have run any. Mark  |  IP: Logged Steve Scott Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1300 From: Minneapolis, MN Registered: Sep 2000 posted 07-11-2004 11:01 AM                     After realigning the studio guides, the focus flutter has disappeared. The tension is better, only needing the 4-o'clock position now, but obviously still too much. Another note, when I turn the tension knob to 12 o'clock, the image can be focused, but remains unstable. We have our tech coming in this week, but failing him I'll work on that clearance as you described, Mark.  |  IP: Logged Mark Gulbrandsen Resident Trollmaster Posts: 16657 From: Music City Registered: Jun 99 posted 07-11-2004 03:08 PM                     When I get done with an SA it usually runs tension setting at 1 to 2 o'clock max. This is with new bands, a good curved runner and sprocket shoes(PA-195) and the depth set to .25". Really, just jink the studio guides into the rewind bench junk drawer. You'll only need them to set the depth adjustmant. Mark  |  IP: Logged System Notices Forum Watchdog / Soup Nazi Posts: 215 Registered: Apr 2004 posted 07-31-2006 03:37 AM                 It has been 749 days since the last post.  |  IP: Logged Carl Martin Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1424 From: Oakland, CA, USA Registered: Feb 2002 posted 07-31-2006 03:37 AM                        regarding setting the 1/4" distance between studio guide and the "flat plate"... not all studio guides are equally thick. comparing gates today i found one of our sa's (s/n 4578) has studio guides 1/4" thick. on our msa, 2 spare sa heads (one of them strong-era) and 2 saw's at the other theater i'm working, the studio guides are all 3/16" thick. this oddball sa has always had somewhat dodgy focus. i've noticed lately that a splice can send the inboard edge of the film riding up the beveled portion of the spring-loaded flange opposite the lateral guide, coming out of the upper loop. poking my finger behind the trap i can push out the flange to re-seat the film. the space between the studio guide and the "flat plate" is just under 1/4", and the gate tensioner is at 3 o'clock, significantly higher than any of the other machines mentioned, yet the gap between the curved runner and the band, at the top of the gate, is clearly too big, allowing the film to ride up the flange as described. i'll mention this to our tech at the next opportunity. it's possible that this was done intentionally, somehow to mitigate the focus problem. i don't want to inadvertently un-fix anything. in addition, there are foil-tape shims under the curved runners.  |  IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2

Printer-friendly view of this topic

Hop To: Select a Forum: Category: Operations -------------------- Digital Cinema Forum Film Handlers' Forum Large Format Forum Ground Level Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets Category: Community -------------------- Film-Yak Film Handlers' Movie Reviews The Afterlife Bob Maar's Joke-A-Thon Category: Classified -------------------- Equipment and Supplies Wanted/For Sale Help Wanted/Seeking Employment Category: System -------------------- Software Beta Testing Forum

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.