my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » twists in film (Page 1)

This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2

Author Topic: twists in film Andrew Vanderhoek Film Handler Posts: 3 From: San Diego, CA Registered: Aug 2004 posted 09-10-2004 12:02 PM                     Recently I got into an argument with one of the managers about threading a projector. The first thing that we are disputing is the sound bar. When threading the projector the sound bar should always be facing up on the platter. Is there a reason for this or is it just standard, the manager says that it does not make a difference. The second argument is twists in the film. I know when threading a project you should not have any twists in the film especially where it loads onto the platter because you can get platter scratches. If you do have a twist in the film anywhere while threading the projector will this cause any problems while the projector is running or is it ok to do that?  |  IP: Logged John Pytlak Film God Posts: 9987 From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922 Registered: Jan 2000 posted 09-10-2004 12:48 PM                        It's all covered in the Film-Tech "Tips" section under "Threading 101": http://www.film-tech.com/tips/threading.html "Finally, bring the film to the "catch" on the center ring. Again, make absolutely sure the soundtrack edge of the film is pointing toward the tree at this final roller and is twisted UP, away from the platter's surface." For old triacetate prints on reels or cores with small hubs, SMPTE Recommended Practice RP39 specified the film always be maintained in an emulsion-in orientation to improve focus stability and reduce "focus flutter". But for modern polyester prints on platters, there are advantages to keeping the analog soundtrack up and away from the platter surface. Note, if you have a hopefully rare occurance of "static cling", changing the winding orientation sometimes helps, depending on the humidity curl of the film. As the relative humidity becomes very low, the gelatin emulsion shrinks somewhat, giving the film more "positive" curl; very damp conditions may make the film curl in the other direction as the damp gelatin expands ("negative" curl).  |  IP: Logged Dustin Mitchell Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1865 From: Mondovi, WI, USA Registered: Mar 2000 posted 09-10-2004 12:51 PM                     Soundtrack up is because estar based film stock has a natural curl too it. Winding it soundtrack down will stretch the curl and cause focus problems in the print. At least that's what I've been told. Never experimented with it myself (for obvious reasons). Doing it one way or the other is good standard practice though, and with the above statement soundtrack up seems to win the day. Generally one twist per 'run' between rollers is not too bad so long as the rollers are far enough apart. A twist in the film between the take-up roller on the edge of the deck and the center ring would not be okay though, for the reasons you mention. Honestly, if you thread the same way every time you should never have any twists.  |  IP: Logged Robert L. Fischer Expert Film Handler Posts: 145 From: Montreal, Quebec Registered: May 2004 posted 09-10-2004 06:51 PM                    I've started a movie before that had a single twist in its longest path between the platter tree and the projector, but that was when someone else threaded it and apparently messed something up (perhaps threaded the projector soundtrack in and fixed it). I wouldn't start anything with more than one twist and I wouldn't start anything with a twist anywhere other than a path that's at least 5 feet or so long. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't see where one twist in 5-10 feet of film could do any significant damage to the film. I'm sure there's some added risk of something going wrong while the movie is running though.  |  IP: Logged Jacob Szewczyk Film Handler Posts: 18 From: Olney, Maryland, USA Registered: Jun 2004 posted 09-10-2004 08:00 PM                     We thread it with the soundtrack facing down and we have had no problems with it. Also, we usually have, at most, one twist, and is eaither from the roller right under the projector to the platter, or from the first platter roller to the yolk on take up.  |  IP: Logged Randy Stankey Film God Posts: 6539 From: Erie, Pennsylvania Registered: Jun 99 posted 09-10-2004 09:03 PM                     Questions about what's better for the film aside, you should come to an agreement exactly how the film is to be threaded through the system... roller by roller... turn by turn... and have EVERYBODY stick to that pattern EXACTLY. Why? There are several good reasons. If one person threads the projector one way and the next person does it his own way, if there is a problem, you might find yourself in a position of having to decode somebody else's threading pattern before you try to solve the problem. It will prevent you from being in a situation like, "Randy threaded this projector. He puts this funky twist in the film right after it comes out of the payout control. Every time I have to fix one of his screw-ups, I have to go back and fix that damn twist before I can solve the real problem." It will prevent film damage. Assuming you have worked out a threading pattern that makes it impossible (or difficult) to damage film, if everybody sticks to the plan, no film should ever get damaged. Putting a twist or a turn in the film in just the right (wrong) spot could mean the difference between the film running correctly on a roller and jumping off or riding up a flange or something worse. If there IS film damage... ostensibly from a malfunction of some kind... it will be easier to figure out what the cause is. You sould be able to look at the film and deduce which rollers, sprockets or pads are responsible for the problem. Finally, let's imagine that film is getting scratched on the left side of the picture because there's a burr on a roller somewhere. If the film is threaded a different way each time, you might end up with scratches all over the film because a different part of the film rubs across that burr each time the film is threaded. Before you know it, you'll have scratches running down BOTH sides of the picture! It'd be like throwing salt on an open wound! You, your manager and your technician should sit down and have a discussion about what's the best way to thread your particular setup. Once that's been decided, everybody should be trained in how to thread that way and ONLY that way! After a suitable period of time for people to get used to the new way, anybody who fails to follow the pattern should be subhect to appropriate disciplinary measures.  |  IP: Logged Peter Mork Expert Film Handler Posts: 181 From: Newton, MA, USA Registered: Jun 2002 posted 09-11-2004 01:49 AM                     Soundtrack up or down? It really doesn't matter, but everyone in the booth should do it the same way. And as the film winds onto the platter, the bottom edge should lead such that it doesn't "fight" the rotation of the platter, if only to prevent an annoying scraping sound. Everyone develops their own routine over time, and in most cases there's no absolute "right" way to do a film path, so unless someone's consistiently putting severe twists in the film, I see no reason to cramp someone else's style just because it's different from yours. It's more important to maintain your roller alignment such that film won't get scratched no matter how it's threaded.  |  IP: Logged Brad Miller Administrator Posts: 17775 From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall) Registered: May 99 posted 09-11-2004 02:43 AM                     I'm mostly with Randy on this one...inparticularly if you are doing something out of the norm like we do with the platter array. Everyone simply MUST thread every twist and turn the same way, because in our case should a scratch turn up, there are literally dozens of different ways the film could have been threaded and it would make tracking down the cause next to impossible. (Of course we don't screw up in the first place, but that's another topic. ) With that being said, we thread with the emulsion on all of the rollers, except where it would force a ridiculous twist (such as the three roller cluster on takeup (AW3 platters), the first takeoff roller on the tree and the two takeup rollers on the wall in front of the projector. Other than those exceptions, the rest of the rollers in the system are "emulsion side" threading. After all, it's the base side that carries the dirt. Always run soundtrack up and always keep the soundtrack toward the tree on takeup. (There are a few exceptions where the soundtrack should run away from the tree on payout, such as a SPECO.) Running soundtrack down exaggerates the curl on the film which causes some minor focusing issues (most noticeable on polyester prints, of which all are these days). Also, the film will physically run louder through the projector due to the exaggerated curl, and some projectors simply cannot run heavily curled film without producing an abnormally shaky image. These threading guidelines also help to minimize foolish operator mistakes. For example, let's say you have a Strong/SPECO platter with a takeup elevator. By keeping the soundtrack up on the platter and toward the tree, should the film come off of one of the takeup rollers and ride on the roller shaft, you will only have black base side scratches instead of beautiful colored emulsion scratches. Same thing goes for running soundtrack up in terms of diagonal scratches. Those are caused by lousy platter designs which run the film too close to the platter deck. Even if nothing I've written here is good enough for someone in the midset of "but this is how I have always done it" to run their films soundtrack edge up, you can't argue with the fact that running soundtrack up protects the emulsion on the wind from diagonal scratches! (I haven't seen a theater in an awful long time actually run soundtrack down, but there are undoubtedly some lingering Cinemarks out there still running that way thanks to one doofus trainer they used to employ.) Another thing to look at is the twisting of the film into and out of the projector. If your platters are on the non-operator side, the soundtrack should run away from the screen to and from the platter. (See this in "Threading 101") If your platters are operator side, the soundtrack should run toward the screen as the film travels to the projector regardless of the platter's tree orientation. In regards to takeup on an operator side positioned platter, if your platter tree is aimed at the projector, the soundtrack should run toward the screen on takeup. If the platter tree is square to the theater wall, the soundtrack should run away from the screen on takeup (forcing a half twist during threading). These guidelines minimizes the amount of twist put on the film as well as maximise the amount of rollers that the emulsion will ride on, keeping your films cleaner.  |  IP: Logged Peter Mork Expert Film Handler Posts: 181 From: Newton, MA, USA Registered: Jun 2002 posted 09-11-2004 04:04 PM                     Most booths do go with "soundtrack up", as a convention. But I seriously doubt doing it otherwise would lead to any kind of focusing problem, in the real world. Film does have a natural curl, but I need to see experimental data before concluding that winding it one way or the other on a big diameter platter core will make a dime's worth of difference in whether that curl is exaggerated or lessened depending on how you do it.  |  IP: Logged Brad Miller Administrator Posts: 17775 From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall) Registered: May 99 posted 09-11-2004 05:04 PM                     I've done the experiments Peter and it's there, otherwise I would not have spent the time to write out my above post. To any non-believers out there, do your own tests to prove it to yourself.  |  IP: Logged Steve Guttag We forgot the crackers Gromit!!! Posts: 12814 From: Annapolis, MD Registered: Dec 1999 posted 09-11-2004 10:14 PM                     I've done the tests myself...emusion-IN has always won on focus stability for me...tests have been limited to the mid-atlantic area. This has been done for reel-to-reel and platter operations. For platter operations I have not found that the orientation made a lick of difference to focus. However, emulsion out (track up) does benefit the platter operation in other areas. With emulsion out wind, the base is presented to the feed-fingers and guide posts as well as the spinning take up deck. Any rubbing on these parts will not rub away or otherwise damage the SDDS track nor likely to cause emulsion scratched in the event of other disasters. As such, I run track up on platters but emulsion-in on reels (upper and lower, no "S" wind). Clearly, your results may vary but those are mine. Steve  |  IP: Logged Brad Miller Administrator Posts: 17775 From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall) Registered: May 99 posted 09-11-2004 11:51 PM                     That's a misleading post there about reel to reel operation, Steve. You told me you have never tested running emulsion out operation with polyester film. Unless you have done thourough testing with this, your comment above really shouldn't be taken too seriously.  |  IP: Logged Tommie Evans Expert Film Handler Posts: 116 From: Birmingham, West Midlands, UK Registered: Sep 2004 posted 09-12-2004 08:10 AM                     Has any one come across problems with prints after running them on a Christie platter (AW3) and then moving the print to a cinemeccanica platter (CNR3-35N). We have four AW3 screens and 21 CNR3-35N screens (dont ask! ) As a print finishes on the AW3 and is moved onto a CNR3-35N the print will completely fold-in on itself, collapsing after the first show. This happens regardless of twists or sound-track 'up' or 'down' resulting in the film almost crushing the pay-out unit. I'm guessing that the cinemeccanica platter loads to film onto the platter fairly tight, where as the christie takes-up fairly loosely. Is this problem caused by the tightness or the different film roll diameter as it loads onto a different size take-up ring, or is it a static problem????  |  IP: Logged Steve Guttag We forgot the crackers Gromit!!! Posts: 12814 From: Annapolis, MD Registered: Dec 1999 posted 09-12-2004 12:25 PM                     Nope...not misleading...the emulsion-out tests were S-winds but stored heads-out emulsion-out....emulsion-in was always the more stable....however...if an emulsion out wind occurs...it can take weeks for the emulsion-in benefit to come back. Emulsion-in, with polyester or acetate remains the most stable for reel-to-reel. Steve  |  IP: Logged Peter Mork Expert Film Handler Posts: 181 From: Newton, MA, USA Registered: Jun 2002 posted 09-12-2004 01:06 PM                     quote: Brad Miller To any non-believers out there, do your own tests to prove it to yourself. Well, being the skeptical sort, I can't resist picking up the gauntlet and doing the following experiment. I took about 30 feet from a recently-struck print (an incomplete reel of Hero we got sent, a sad story in itself). Did a "pinch test" - dangled the film vertically and pinched the edges to see which way it wanted to bend. It curled emulsion-inward, as expected. Cut it at the midpoint, flipped one half over, and spliced together. Wound it snugly around a standard Super Platter centerpiece, taped down the end, and set aside. Will check it in a month to see if curl, or more importantly projected focus, is affected between the track-up and track-down sections. Watch this space for the thrilling, and no doubt utterly inconclusive, result.  |  IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2

Printer-friendly view of this topic

Hop To: Select a Forum: Category: Operations -------------------- Digital Cinema Forum Film Handlers' Forum Large Format Forum Ground Level Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets Category: Community -------------------- Film-Yak Film Handlers' Movie Reviews The Afterlife Bob Maar's Joke-A-Thon Category: Classified -------------------- Equipment and Supplies Wanted/For Sale Help Wanted/Seeking Employment Category: System -------------------- Software Beta Testing Forum

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.