|
|
Author
|
Topic: Is image focus always a compromise?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Randy Stankey
Film God
Posts: 6539
From: Erie, Pennsylvania
Registered: Jun 99
|
posted 09-22-2004 12:34 AM
Well, in my opinion, getting good focus IS a compromise, though you should have only a very little compromise.
People sometimes only think about the "ideal" projector, whereby the film advances to a frame then it remains still in the gate for 1/24 of a second until the mechanism advances to the next frame.
In truth, the film is in constant motion. Even if you subtract out all the variables in the film mechanism itself such as pull-down time vs. dwell time; acceleration/deceleration forces on the film; movement of the parts of the gate itself and other things you still have to think about the fact that the film is actually "flexing" in the gate as the ratiant energy from the light source hits it.
Once the film has steadied itself in the gate, the shutter opens and the light hits it. On all but the most tame light sources, the film will instantly begin to absorb energy and heat up. This will cause the film to expand and "bubble up" in the gate. If I remember correctly, it bubbles toward the light. (Or toward the emulsion side.)
The film is actually out of focus for part of the time that any given fram is in the gate. It's just that the eye only seems to remember the part that was in focus.
So, a projectionist's job is to get the projector in a state where all the variables are minimized as much as he can and allow the eye of the viewer to perceive as much of the "in focus" time as possible.
Ideally, if you have your projector working the way it should be, the viewer should never perceive an out of focus condition. In reality you might have to "tune" the focus knob so that as much of the image is in focus as possible... preferably the area nearest the center of the screen.
I *DO* agree with the rest in that, if you find you have to make too many compromises, you will need to fix something.
My definition of "too many compromises" comes when an experienced viewer can notice an out of focus condition without trying.
If there IS a part of the screen that is out of focus, you should have to look to find it. (And, I mean you must have to search for it!)
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|