Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Projector Plinths

   
Author Topic: Projector Plinths
David Graham Rose
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 187
From: Cambridge, UK
Registered: Sep 2002


 - posted 09-22-2004 03:03 PM      Profile for David Graham Rose   Email David Graham Rose   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Greetings All from a highly dreary Cambridge

I have recently been on an excursion of theatres in the United Kingdom as part of my work for the Film Council. There are a number of points upon which clarification is necessary.

a) in the main, installations having Cinemeccanica projection apparatus in 78% of installations (of this type of projector) are mounted upon what one can only describe as 'plinths'.

b) installations with Century (or what was the Westrex projector) have 'plinths' - albeit cleverly designed steel frames - in only 1.3% of the installed apparatus.

Whilst during the course of my research, there are roughly equal numbers of Cinemeccanica and Century in operation here in the UK I find it necessary to question these statistics.

Could it be that Cinemeccanica projectors are ill- equipped for the design trends and porthole positions of the UK multi screen auditoria? I am led to believe not, since even the prestigious Odeon Theatre Leicester Square is furnished with what can only be described as negative 'plinths', where the highly polished parquet floor has been excavated to accomodate said plinth. Could anyone shine any light on this matter, since I need to report back to the Film Council as to the suitability of said theatres for future digital cinema installations.

On another point, do US projection apparatus manufacturers, sensibly position the optical axis to align with current standard regulations of porthole height, or has Brussels once again interfered once too often?

From a Wintery Cambridge

David

R

 |  IP: Logged

Ken McFall
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 615
From: Haringey, London.
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 09-22-2004 03:31 PM      Profile for Ken McFall   Email Ken McFall   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Hi David,

the need to use a plinth is determined by the height of the porthole and the rake of the projector in relation to the height of the projector lens. Also in a few cases to clear the heads of people in the back row!

Before you start to consider if a particular projector make has a need to use a plinth by 'design' you need to include the above considerations in your findings.

The projectors have, in many cases, been installed into an existing older building and have had to fit the existing ports. In newer sites the ports will have been positioned to suit the projector. Also newer sites tend to have larger ports than older buildings so there is much more latitude.

Regards.

 |  IP: Logged

Paul Mayer
Oh get out of it Melvin, before it pulls you under!

Posts: 3836
From: Albuquerque, NM
Registered: Feb 2000


 - posted 09-22-2004 05:04 PM      Profile for Paul Mayer   Author's Homepage   Email Paul Mayer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
One of the new theatres here (built in 2001) was designed with very steep rake angles needed to light most of the screens. But the ports were installed at standard height. So most of the consoles had to be mounted on custom-made pedestals in order to achieve the rake needed and still get through the port hole. The installation techs had to fabricate the pedestals on the fly--initially they just used stacks of cut 2x4's. [Smile]

Another new construction here got the rake angles much better, but blew it on the port sizes. The booth wall was very thick--so thick that with the THX-certified front glass in place the picture was vignetted. The initial workaround was to leave the auditorium-side glass off the port and go with only the booth-side glass in place. Don't remember what the final solution was for that one.

Ah, the wonders of modern multiplex theatre architecture! [Roll Eyes]

 |  IP: Logged

Daryl C. W. O'Shea
Film God

Posts: 3977
From: Midland Ontario Canada (where Panavision & IMAX lenses come from)
Registered: Jun 2002


 - posted 09-22-2004 05:10 PM      Profile for Daryl C. W. O'Shea   Author's Homepage   Email Daryl C. W. O'Shea   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Most, if not all, first generation DLP setups are mounted on standard 35mm consoles or pedestals. So if a standard console or pedestal already fits in place, so will a DLP (or other digital type) install.

We all know the DLP folks aren't the brightest [Wink] , but they're not dumb enough to build something that won't fit in existing theatres.

 |  IP: Logged

Scott Norwood
Film God

Posts: 8146
From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas)
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 09-22-2004 07:27 PM      Profile for Scott Norwood   Author's Homepage   Email Scott Norwood   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
True, but there are some issues with the Barco DP100 (new 2k DLP) and steep tilt angles. I recently saw an installation which involved the aforementioned 2x4s in order to get the same tilt angle that was accomplished with normal Simplex 5-point pedestals for the film projectors.

Not sure about the other current-model DLP machines, as the only other one that I've seen up close was a first-generation model based on a Christie SLC console.

 |  IP: Logged

Paul Mayer
Oh get out of it Melvin, before it pulls you under!

Posts: 3836
From: Albuquerque, NM
Registered: Feb 2000


 - posted 09-22-2004 10:07 PM      Profile for Paul Mayer   Author's Homepage   Email Paul Mayer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The Sanyo's I've worked with didn't have enough vertical lens shift to deal with the rake in stadium auditoriums. Always ended up having to shim the back end and deal with any resulting focus flatness issues. Anytime I go out on a video projection job these days I carry a few 2x4 blocks in my expendibles box. 2x4: a.k.a. "Coarse Vertical Centering Adjustment." [Roll Eyes]

May have a new full-time job shortly, working with some of the newest Barcos. Hopefully I will get to see firsthand what sort of tilt/shift range they have.

 |  IP: Logged

Ian Joseph Parfrey
Film Handler

Posts: 56
From: Bollier Queensland Australia
Registered: Sep 2004


 - posted 09-23-2004 01:12 AM      Profile for Ian Joseph Parfrey   Email Ian Joseph Parfrey   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
In my experience here down under, the primary reason for projector plinths are for the prevention of transmitted projector motor vibration through to the floor of the bio and hence to the auditorium. Bauer recommend plinths in their manuals for the U3 U4's. I'll bet most of the plinths you found are built out of timber for that very reason.

Cheers and Beers

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)  
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.