my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » TES Integrity Checks and Splicing Leaders

Author Topic: TES Integrity Checks and Splicing Leaders Dustin Mitchell Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1865 From: Mondovi, WI, USA Registered: Mar 2000 posted 09-28-2004 12:40 PM                     It occured to me the other day when building up a used print that the new practice of properly splicing the leaders back on that TES has apparantly adopted may not be all that good after all. Let me explain. As we know when TES does an 'Integrity Check' they are only checking the first 20 feet of the film for damage. I suppose this is better than nothing. Recently they apparantly improved this service by properly splicing the head leader back on if it was improperly done in the first place. You can tell they are doing this because the tail of the print is attached with masking tape (the part of the reel TES didn't look at) and the head with a single sided clear splice. When I first noticed this happening my reaction was 'cool, step in the right direction.' However, when building up Fahrenheit 9/11 the other day (real smart idea to bring that back ) it dawned on me that the splices on the heads of the reels looked TOO clean. You see, all the tails-the ones that were masking taped on-had the left over crappy zebra tape still on them; naturally the 'projectionist' at the last theatre didn't peel their tape. I had a fairly diffcult time geting this stuff off and even then there was some residue left over, the edges still looked yellowish from the tape residue. Not so with the heads which TES had respliced. They were as clean as a whistle. Now as much as I want to give TES the benefit of the doubt-perhaps they have some really good tape peelers working for them or some really great chemical to clean the residue off-I think it is far more likely they are chopping frames from the print. Even worse, even with the nice singled sided splices they are making with good quality easy to peel clear tape there are probably still plenty of shitheads out there who are just going to chop an additional frame off the reel instead of unmaking the splice. Thus the print is losing TWO frames, one at the depot and one at the make up table. I think that although we all may disagree about how many ID frames to leave per reel everyone here can agree chopping frames instead of peeling tape is FILM DONE WRONG. So what to do? Personaly I can understand if TES does not have the time or the resources to have their people peel tape, it certainly is a pain in the ass. I would instead ask them to make their one sided clear splice over the old tape. This way people who peel tape can take care of the old suff when it gets to them and those shitheads who chop frames won't care either way.  |  IP: Logged Brad Miller Administrator Posts: 17775 From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall) Registered: May 99 posted 09-28-2004 12:42 PM                     They should be taping OVER whatever tape is there with no cutting allowed. If that is happening, then the practice does immediately need to be put to an end. I will inquire and report back.  |  IP: Logged Mark J. Marshall Film God Posts: 3188 From: New Castle, DE, USA Registered: Aug 2002 posted 09-28-2004 01:27 PM                    They should splice the heads AND the tails, and charge theaters $10 for every splice they have to make. That would more than cover the cost of their resources needed. Edit: And while they're at it, they should charge $20 if it takes longer than 20 seconds to peel off the tape used by the theater.  |  IP: Logged Brad Miller Administrator Posts: 17775 From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall) Registered: May 99 posted 09-28-2004 01:29 PM                     Sadly, there's literally not time enough to do that.  |  IP: Logged John Pytlak Film God Posts: 9987 From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922 Registered: Jan 2000 posted 09-28-2004 03:26 PM                        Whenever possible, PRESERVE CONTINUITY. That is, don't remove frames unless absolutely necessary to prevent further print damage or poor screen presentation (e.g., a lab splice mid-frame). I also fear that a good splice on the head leader without also correcting a poor splice on the tail leader could give a false sense of security to a changeover operator tempted to project the heads-out reel without proper bench inspection of the entire reel.  |  IP: Logged John T. Hendrickson, Jr Jedi Master Film Handler Posts: 889 From: Freehold, NJ, USA Registered: Apr 2001 posted 09-28-2004 05:01 PM                     John- You, I, and everyone else here knows that any changeover operator who does not bench inspect a print prior to showing it, gets exactly what they deserve!  |  IP: Logged Brad Miller Administrator Posts: 17775 From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall) Registered: May 99 posted 09-28-2004 05:28 PM                     I would have to agree, any changeover operator that doesn't wind the reels to the end to check the splice is just plain stupid. Part of the point of re-splicing the head leaders back on can be seen on page 1 of the "you suck" thread. Masking tape splices rarely line up the edges of the film, so during shipping the sprockets get damaged. At least as the QC checkers unreel the first 20 feet of each reel, they are fixing that problem so more damage does not happen from the TES depot to the next theater. That's the main point of it. What I can't stand are those reels that grab the tip of the tail leader as it is tucked into the core, thus that at the end of the reel, the tail is unable to be released. In such a situation, it causes a platter-less wrap situation in the projector. (The translucent TES reels are very guilty of this.)  |  IP: Logged Steve Guttag We forgot the crackers Gromit!!! Posts: 12814 From: Annapolis, MD Registered: Dec 1999 posted 09-28-2004 09:02 PM                     A good changeover operator is going to check the C/O cues anyway so they are at most 24 frames away from the potential tail splice...thus it is a non-issue. Steve  |  IP: Logged John Pytlak Film God Posts: 9987 From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922 Registered: Jan 2000 posted 09-28-2004 10:20 PM                        quote: A good changeover operator Let's hope they are all good.  |  IP: Logged John T. Hendrickson, Jr Jedi Master Film Handler Posts: 889 From: Freehold, NJ, USA Registered: Apr 2001 posted 09-29-2004 08:01 PM                     Golly gee, John, don't we wish they were! Steve brings up a good point. Standard procedure to check for cue marks, but we all know there are people out there who don't, then stand there with their mouth open when they blow a changeover.  |  IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

Printer-friendly view of this topic

Hop To: Select a Forum: Category: Operations -------------------- Digital Cinema Forum Film Handlers' Forum Large Format Forum Ground Level Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets Category: Community -------------------- Film-Yak Film Handlers' Movie Reviews The Afterlife Bob Maar's Joke-A-Thon Category: Classified -------------------- Equipment and Supplies Wanted/For Sale Help Wanted/Seeking Employment Category: System -------------------- Software Beta Testing Forum

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.