Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE: Lab Production Problems

my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

»	Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE » Operations » Film Handlers' Forum » Lab Production Problems

Author

Topic: Lab Production Problems

Paul Konen
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 981
From: Frisco, TX. (North of Dallas)
Registered: Jun 99

posted 10-03-2004 12:02 AM

I received a note with my print of "Woman Thou Art Loosed" that stated the following:

quote:
Due to production error, your print of Woman Thou Art Loosed may have base side of the film facing out. Please note this while building up the print.

We apologize for inconvenience this has caused your theatre.

My questions are:

1. What kind of problems would I see / have? Bad focus?
2. What good would it to "note" it? If you are careful during building, then you should be ok.

Thanks

| IP: Logged

Steve Kraus
Film God

Posts: 4094
From: Chicago, IL, USA
Registered: May 2000

posted 10-03-2004 12:17 AM

Is it possible that they meant that the print (or some reels) was printed so that correct orientation requires it to run with the emulsion side towards the lens rather than towards the lamp? If so it will play ok but there will be a big focus jump between it and normally oriented material. It would dull the high end off analog sound and might prevent successfull SR∙D or SDDS playback, particularly the latter. DTS would probably read ok.

| IP: Logged

Steve Scott
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1300
From: Minneapolis, MN
Registered: Sep 2000

posted 10-05-2004 10:00 AM

Or it could be that they wound the film onto the reel with the base side out. It seems to me that they'd be more likely to send a note for this kind of problem, rather than a different printing technique like Steve mentioned. Sad, but that's what they'd make me expect!

| IP: Logged

Steve Kraus
Film God

Posts: 4094
From: Chicago, IL, USA
Registered: May 2000

posted 10-05-2004 11:10 AM

Probably true. Odd that a warning is required. Film can be wound on a reel any one of 4 different ways. Certainly tails-out often comes either way all the time. Since heads-out emulsion-out is an industry standard and emulsion-in is recommended by tests (or at least was during acetate days) no one ought to be confused by it.

| IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000

posted 10-05-2004 11:15 AM

The "standard" emulsion position for 35mm release prints specified by SMPTE 194-2002 is with the emulsion toward the lamp:

quote:
2.1 The photographic emulsion shall be on the side of the film which faces away from the projector
lens. The projectable image area is specified in SMPTE 195.

A 35mm print with the correct emulsion orientation will "read" correctly through the emulsion side.

Incorrect emulsion orientation could have been caused by printing the negative through the base -- this results in some loss of sharpness. And the incorrect orientation will need to be refocused relative to the other parts of the print having the correct orientation.

Incorrect emulsion orientation cannot be corrected.

Simple winding orientation can be reversed by rewinding the print.

quote: Steve Kraus
Since heads-out emulsion-out is an industry standard and emulsion-in is recommended by tests (or at least was during acetate days) no one ought to be confused by it.

"Heads-out emulsion-out" is NOT an "industry standard", but it is the most common practice, especially for labs that use "loop" type printers. We've discussed the emulsion-in recommendation of SMPTE Recommended Practice RP 39, which definitely helps the focus stability of triacetate prints.

[ 10-05-2004, 01:24 PM: Message edited by: John Pytlak ]

| IP: Logged

Dominic Case
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 131
From: Sydney NSW Australia
Registered: Aug 2003

posted 10-05-2004 10:00 PM

Hard to imagine that this really means that the print was produced with incorrect geometry (i.e. requiring base towards the lamp). The note that Paul quotes from seems to indicate that the entire copy is the same. As different reels are usually printed on different printers, I can't understand a mistake of this type occurring. (Though I admit anything is possible).

Seems more likely that this is the lesser sin of incorrect orientation on the spool. In which case, it ought to be obvious when you build the print, and a warning shouldn't be necessary: but surely it is better practice for the lab to alert the projectionist rather than leave the careful projectionist discover the problem all over again, and the slapdash one to get into trouble.

Better still to correct it in the lab of course - but time is always the bugbear, and rewinding however many reels and copies would probably have resulted in late delivery. Can't win!

| IP: Logged

John Hawkinson
Film God

Posts: 2273
From: Cambridge, MA, USA
Registered: Feb 2002

posted 10-06-2004 07:09 AM

So, Paul, are you going to keep us in suspense? [Wink]

Was it winding orientation, or is the emulsion actually on the wrong side? (or neither, given the "may")

--jhawk

| IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99

posted 10-06-2004 02:46 PM

From Technicolor:

quote:
There seems to be some confusion on the web-site about the meaning of the note included in "Woman Thou Art Loosed." Prints are always shipped from Technicolor emulsion out. This title was base out. Because this varied from the norm, we just wanted to include a note that clarified the issue. It seems to have created more confusion than anything else. Nothing unusual about the prints, just wound the "wrong" way.

| IP: Logged

Gordon McLeod
Film God

Posts: 9532
From: Toronto Ontario Canada
Registered: Jun 99

posted 10-06-2004 09:36 PM

Actually they shipped it the right way [Big Grin]

| IP: Logged

Daryl C. W. O'Shea
Film God

Posts: 3977
From: Midland Ontario Canada (where Panavision & IMAX lenses come from)
Registered: Jun 2002

posted 10-06-2004 10:10 PM

The majority of the prints I get come this way... mostly from Technicolor Rome.

| IP: Logged

Steve Scott
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1300
From: Minneapolis, MN
Registered: Sep 2000

posted 10-07-2004 02:46 PM

With the foot of tape they're using to secure heads nowadays, I've sometimes opened up a can and thought that the print had been wound base side out, and the head IDs were showing... [Roll Eyes]

| IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99

posted 10-07-2004 03:03 PM

But you haven't had a single leader be loose and unraveled inside the can either, have you? [Cool]

| IP: Logged

Steve Scott
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1300
From: Minneapolis, MN
Registered: Sep 2000

posted 10-08-2004 10:27 AM

quote: Brad Miller
But you haven't had a single leader be loose and unraveled inside the can either, have you?

Touche, my rants on that tape are dying since they finally started using it, in whatever incarnation. [Smile]

| IP: Logged

Josh Jones
Redhat

Posts: 1207
From: Plano, TX
Registered: Apr 2000

posted 10-10-2004 12:29 AM

After having to deal with an bollywood movie on thursday, I can attest to this. Although it would have been nice if they at least reattached the leaders.

Josh

| IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

Printer-friendly view of this topic

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.