|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
Author
|
Topic: Print Pocket
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nicholas Simmons
Film Handler
Posts: 6
From: Walnut Creek, CA
Registered: Jun 2004
|
posted 10-05-2004 11:47 PM
I have used them. We have 2. They are rather flimsy however, especially considering their cost. If you get one, put a bunch of screws in it first, because the glued sides start to come off quite quickly. As for usefullness, they are good for long moves, obstacles (stairs), and when you are alone. Otherwise, two person moving is much easier. We don't clamp, just grab them and move (Christie platters). In short, probably not worth it unless two person moving is too difficult currently. With 18 screens, using the pocket for every move would just be a waste of time.
| IP: Logged
|
|
Dave Black
Film Handler
Posts: 2
From: Woodbridge, VA, USA
Registered: Oct 2003
|
posted 10-07-2004 11:25 AM
We began manufacturing PRINT POCKETS three and one half years ago, in response to an obvious need for a safer way to move prints between screens in a multiplex. Basically they are a pocket which you hold up to the platter and slide the print into. After you lower the PRINT POCKET to the floor, you can effortlessly roll the print to its destination. Unlike clamps, the print removal and installation process takes only a few seconds, and will not scratch platters. And unlike the two-projectionist carry method, prints can be moved long distances and there is little chance of damaging a print.
PRINT POCKETS are especially useful when screens are separated by long corridors, stairs, and narrow doorways. Their primary purpose is to prevent dropping a print. But they also make it quite practical for one person to move all but the largest films single-handedly. And they serve as excellent temporary storage for assembled prints. PRINT POCKETS have even been used to transport assembled films between multiplexes.
Currently PRINT POCKETS are in use all across the US, plus several countries around the world. Until recently, they have been sold primarily by word-of-mouth. Chains of customers telling other customers. Or when a manager moves to a new theater, he orders a set for that theater. Maybe a third of our orders come from theaters which have recently dropped a print. We sold a pair after one theater dropped HARRY POTTER on its opening weekend.
We do not believe PRINT POCKETS are flimsy. Because the user must lift the PRINT POCKET plus as much as 3.5 hours' worth of film in it, the weight of the PRINT POCKET is an important issue. Thus a tradeoff must be made between strength and weight, and this determines the material used. We could build it to withstand being run over by a truck, but the added weight would make the product unusable. The PRINT POCKET is more than strong enough to do its job if it is handled with reasonable care. However, it may suffer damage if it is dropped down a flight of stairs while loaded with film. [In the case I know about where a loaded PRINT POCKET went down a flight of stairs, the print itself was not damaged, and the PRINT POCKET received only minor damage.]
We are always glad to hear feedback from users. We have made numerous improvements to the product over the years, and will continue to do so. To date, feedback has been overwhelmingly positive. By the way, our first six PRINT POCKETS have been in daily use at a local multiplex for over three years. They are all still in use, and the theater recently bought two more.
At one time, we experimented with shipping PRINT POCKETS in a 'knocked down' mode, saving on shipping costs but requiring the purchaser to do some of the critical final assembly. We have quit offering that option, as it took an important part of the quality control out of our hands. For a short while we assembled PRINT POCKETS with a different (and, as it turns out) inferior glue. Now we use glue that's stronger than the material itself.
It's true PRINT POCKETS are not cheap. But have you priced 42" movie reels lately? There is much more labor in a PRINT POCKET than a film reel. Its price is quite low compared to the cost of a ruined print or cancelled shows.
We make two sizes of PRINT POCKETS: Standard and Large. The Standard holds 160-170 minutes of film and is capable of moving 95% of all assembled prints. Large is for those Big films such as LOTR3 or PEARL HARBOR. Of course, the Large will also carry smaller films, but personally we prefer to use the Standard PRINT POCKET when possible, because it's lighter in weight and more easily maneuvered. Each theater should have one Large PRINT POCKET for the big films, however.
Because PRINT POCKETS are so useful, we recommend theaters have one PRINT POCKET for every 4 or 5 screens. This ratio works out very well, permitting storing built-up prints awaiting delivery to their screen or awaiting teardown. It also allows several projectionists to move prints simultaneously.
While it's true a theater can move prints without our film mover, projectionists who have used them say "Never move a print without a PRINT POCKET."
Please contact me if you'd like a flyer.
Dave Black
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|