Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE: Self threading 35mm projectors??

my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

»	Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE » Operations » Film Handlers' Forum » Self threading 35mm projectors?? (Page 1)

This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2

Author

Topic: Self threading 35mm projectors??

Allison Parsons
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 630
From: East Peoria, IL
Registered: Oct 2004

posted 11-29-2004 10:48 PM

Was there ever a self-threading 35mm projector, or talks about making one? My 8 and 16mm are self threading (for the most part) of course, so i'm assuming it would just be too hard to make a 35mm one work as easily as most 8mm.

I highly highly enjoy the act of threading but that question has always been in the back of my head.

| IP: Logged

Randy Stankey
Film God

Posts: 6539
From: Erie, Pennsylvania
Registered: Jun 99

posted 11-29-2004 11:24 PM

I'm sure somebody's tried to invent one at one time or another but every time somebody brings up this question to me I always give the same answer.

There's an old saying: "If you make something so simple that even an idiot could use it, only an idiot would WANT to use it!".

[Wink]

| IP: Logged

Monte L Fullmer
Film God

Posts: 8367
From: Nampa, Idaho, USA
Registered: Nov 2004

posted 11-30-2004 01:58 AM

Big reason why not ever a self-threading machine was dreamt up, is due to the framing issue: 35mm didn't have the luxury as does 8mm/9.5mm/16mm, where these formats has the one sprocket per frame. - Monte

| IP: Logged

Dick Vaughan
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1032
From: Bradford, West Yorkshire, UK
Registered: Jul 2000

posted 11-30-2004 06:27 AM

The IMAX MPX projector is self threading and has 15 perfs per frame.

| IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000

posted 11-30-2004 07:36 AM

The Arriflex "LocPro" 35mm portable projector is "slot threading", where the film is simply dropped into a slot and the projector forms the loops and engages the film on the sprockets:

http://www.arri.com/sub/us/org/press/dailies.htm

quote:
Poster remembered hearing about the Arriflex LocPro 35, a portable 35mm projector designed to screen printed dailies. In fact, fellow cinematographer Richard Crudo, ASC had used it on location in Nelson, British Columbia, for the Disney/Spyglass feature Out Cold, when he was 300 miles from the nearest screening room. (Other recent films that used the LocPro 35 include Cast Away, The Mexican, Zoolander, Evolution, Big Bad Love and Domestic Disturbance.) At just over 100 pounds, measuring 29"x28"x20" and enclosed in a rolling case, the LocPro is easy to transport and compact enough to fit on a tabletop.

http://www.arri.com/infodown/other/broch/locpro_e.pdf

| IP: Logged

Michael Schaffer
"Where is the
Boardwalk Hotel?"

Posts: 4143
From: Boston, MA
Registered: Apr 2002

posted 11-30-2004 07:46 AM

This may be a stupid question, but I wonder how you watch dailies 300 miles away from the nearest screening room when that probably means you are also 300 miles away from the nearest lab to develop the negative?

| IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000

posted 11-30-2004 08:03 AM

Sometimes they are "Next-Dailies". [Big Grin]

Many cinematographers rightfully feel "video dailies" do not have the resolution to pick up subtle problems like slight errors in focus pulling, and really prefer looking at film dailies, even on location. Others rely on the lab contact to relay any problems they see when viewing the dailies at the lab.

| IP: Logged

Bill Gabel
Film God

Posts: 3873
From: Technicolor / Postworks NY, USA
Registered: Jan 2002

posted 11-30-2004 08:42 AM

Like John said about dailies, can be done using portable systems. There are a few companies that have motor homes turned into mobile screening rooms for location shoots. We handle dailies here and sometimes they are not seen the of the shoot. But sometimes a day or so later. All you need to see dailies is a projector and a mag reproducer. Because you are only hearing a single track of sound.

| IP: Logged

Steve Kraus
Film God

Posts: 4094
From: Chicago, IL, USA
Registered: May 2000

posted 11-30-2004 10:32 AM

And sometimes that magnetic reproducer is built right into the projector using a special soundhead so separate picture and soundtrack can all run together on the same machine. I have two such units in storage--with full Davis loop-like soundtrack paths (not like that awful Simplex "let's stick a mag head and a couple of rollers in a 5-Star" thing).

Before the advent of magnetic recording in the late 40's sound was recorded on photographic film directly by optical recorders like those now used only at the very end of the chain to make the sound negatives for making release prints. Thus, the soundtracks being cut and spliced by editors at their Moviolas were prints of such original sound negatives. Dailies and workprint screenings would have used a projector with an ordinary optical soundhead under it with modifications to both so that separate picture and sound films can simultaneously pass through the appropriate parts.

| IP: Logged

Paul Mayer
Oh get out of it Melvin, before it pulls you under!

Posts: 3836
From: Albuquerque, NM
Registered: Feb 2000

posted 11-30-2004 12:17 PM

My buddy Dave ran the LockPro for dailies on The Mexican here. They just set up a tripod screen, the LockPro, and a Rangertone dubber in a hotel room and voila, instant dailies. Well almost instant--the footage was flown to LA for overnight processing and printing and viewed the next day.

Other shoots here have used screening trailers or built their own temporary screening rooms using equipment brought up from LA. There are no longer any screening rooms here that I know of, or even theaters that can do changeovers, let alone handle double-system stuff.

The stuff Steve mentions is usually what we get here. The stuff I used on Casino came from Judy Dolan in Van Nuys--a pair of XL's and RCA soundheads fitted with a mag head mounted between the impedance roller and the drive sprocket. The screening trailer I checked out on here also had a very similar set up.

I seem to recall that the classic IMAX projector could be threaded in such a way as to be partially "self threading" in that it formed its own loops. Still had to thread part of it manually to ensure correct framing though. I was shown that technique once but never used it and have long since forgotten how to do it. That technique was frowned upon by IMAX.

| IP: Logged

Scott Norwood
Film God

Posts: 8146
From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas)
Registered: Jun 99

posted 11-30-2004 12:39 PM

How does the MPX system auto-thread itself in frame? Does it have some sort of (optical?) sensor for this, or does it require that the end of the film be cut on a frameline?

In addition to the framing issue, the reasons for not having an auto-thread 35mm machine probably include the general lack of need for such a device. The 16mm auto-shred [sic] concept made sense because the machines were designed to be used by school teachers, not professional projectionists. Anyone operating 35mm equipment needs to have plenty of knowedge about mechanical and electronic devices anyway; therefore, there is really not much need to simplify the equipment. Besides, if adding the "feature" were to add a dollar or more to the cost of the projector, no theatre owner would ever pay for it.

| IP: Logged

Kyle McEachern
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 165
From: San Francisco, CA
Registered: Feb 2004

posted 11-30-2004 01:27 PM

quote: Scott Norwood
How does the MPX system auto-thread itself in frame?

From what I've been told, the MPX has the capability to adjust its framing in either direction, as far as necessary. Since it works with a "rolling loop" system, it just simply (at the press of a button) makes the next loop one perf bigger or one perf smaller to adjust where the film is, framing-wise. I haven't seen one, so I don't know what the procedure is for getting the film in frame pre-start (or if there is one), but since it can re-frame indefinitely, chances are they say "start it at a frameline at this place, and then let it go from there". But with its ability to re-frame an indefinite amount of times, if it's out it can go back in easily.

| IP: Logged

Carl Martin
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1424
From: Oakland, CA, USA
Registered: Feb 2002

posted 11-30-2004 04:31 PM

quote: Scott Norwood
Besides, if adding the "feature" were to add a dollar or more to the cost of the projector, no theatre owner would ever pay for it.

are you kidding? theater owners will gladly pay for anything that will let them reduce their staff hours. with a self-threading projector they would only need one trained person to build and break. everyone else would be shown how to "drop the film in the hole" right after learning how to use the butter pump.

carl

| IP: Logged

Monte L Fullmer
Film God

Posts: 8367
From: Nampa, Idaho, USA
Registered: Nov 2004

posted 11-30-2004 05:25 PM

Optical film recording for sound...good ol' Fantasound format for Disney's "Fantasia" - Just too bad it didn't take off for the other studios to do stereophonic sound back then. But, oh the cost of it all to for the theatre setups, and that was only for road show releases houses. More nitrate to be floating around.- Monte

| IP: Logged

Bill Gabel
Film God

Posts: 3873
From: Technicolor / Postworks NY, USA
Registered: Jan 2002

posted 11-30-2004 05:28 PM

Laemmle Theatres in Los Angeles, uses the Christie Elf platter system in that manner. At some of their theatres they had the projectionist drive between theatres. When they went into a limited service type of contract with the projectionist union. So management started and stopped shows when the projectionist was at the other theatre. With the ELF platter the film stays treaded in the projector.

| IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2

Printer-friendly view of this topic

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.