my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Help needed in identifying a test film (Page 1)

This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2

Author Topic: Help needed in identifying a test film Luciano Brigite Master Film Handler Posts: 277 From: Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil Registered: Jan 2002 posted 12-24-2004 06:45 PM                     Hello, After a long time trying to get new test films for me,I finally got them.However when I received the reels, instead of getting this test film (picture bellow) : I received this one: I have no idea what it is, if it's another kind of test film for optical alignment of analog readers or some other kind of test tone . Could someone point out what it is and in case it is another kind of alignment film for optics, how it is used? I tried to use it to align lateral position of a sound reader but couldn't do much with it and didn't get more than the cell reading picture edges or perforation Thanks.  |  IP: Logged Steve Guttag We forgot the crackers Gromit!!! Posts: 12814 From: Annapolis, MD Registered: Dec 1999 posted 12-24-2004 07:08 PM                     The upper film looks like the original style "Buzz-Track" aka P35-BT. The lower film is 1KHz tone...aka P35-SL Steve Merry X-Mass  |  IP: Logged Luciano Brigite Master Film Handler Posts: 277 From: Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil Registered: Jan 2002 posted 12-24-2004 07:28 PM                     Uh oh.. I received the wrong film then and it had to be the film that was more expensive.. I ordered buzz track and got 1KHz tone.. Now what to do with it....umm.. maybe I should hang it around the xmass tree kidding..will see if I can exchange it for the film I originally ordered. Thanks Steve. and a merry xmass to you too. (and to everyone else too!)  |  IP: Logged Christos Mitsakis Expert Film Handler Posts: 242 From: Ag.Paraskevi, ATHENS, GREECE Registered: Sep 1999 posted 12-25-2004 08:28 AM                     It is strange that the original "buzz track" had modulation only on the left channel side, so I suppose you set the scaning beam by reading that modulation and the one "produced" by the sprocket holes, adjusting the slit to project right inbetween. There is nothing much nowdays to do with a 1KHz mono track. This test film is of archival significance. Steve, what was its original use anyway? Best Wishes, and All my Seasons Greetings to All. Christos.  |  IP: Logged Gordon McLeod Film God Posts: 9532 From: Toronto Ontario Canada Registered: Jun 99 posted 12-25-2004 12:48 PM                     "It is strange that the original "buzz track" had modulation only on the left channel side, so I suppose you set the scaning beam by reading that modulation and the one "produced" by the sprocket holes, adjusting the slit to project right inbetween." Not true there is a high frequency tone on the perf edge  |  IP: Logged Monte L Fullmer Film God Posts: 8367 From: Nampa, Idaho, USA Registered: Nov 2004 posted 12-26-2004 03:09 AM                     ...looks like more of a DTS test/alignment strip of sorts, being the signal is on the inboard edge of the soundtrack. - Monte  |  IP: Logged Steve Guttag We forgot the crackers Gromit!!! Posts: 12814 From: Annapolis, MD Registered: Dec 1999 posted 12-26-2004 09:19 AM                     As Gordon sez... The Buzz track test film (original style) did indeed have both tones. The photo didn't do it justice by resolving the higher pitched tone (finer resolution needed). It had gard bands, unlike the current version so you see the solid line outside of the square wave signals. The 1KHz film was used primarily for balancing the level between two or more projectors. This was long before the 85dB thing and Dolby. However, you would want the two machines balanced on changeover. Another use for 1KHz is that it makes for easy projector speed calibration or checking...just thread up some 1KHz and hook up a frequency counter to the sound system and whola. I found it easy to use for setting other speeds for silent film projection too...sure one can use a "strobe" on the shutter or sprockets but I liked the film the best. We have a stash of P16-SL (400Hz tone and 16mm)...and still use it to balance the sound on 16mm changeover. It also is recorded at 100% modulation (or thereabouts) so balancing the 16mm levels to 35mm is a bit more precise and predictable before the first 16mm feature is shown. Steve  |  IP: Logged Michael Schaffer "Where is the Boardwalk Hotel?" Posts: 4143 From: Boston, MA Registered: Apr 2002 posted 12-26-2004 09:30 AM                        quote: Monte L Fullmer ...looks like more of a DTS test/alignment strip of sorts, being the signal is on the inboard edge of the soundtrack. - Monte Actually the DTS reader alignment film looks very different from this. But you cannot buy it, so chances are slim that you will ever see it. In the place of the DTS timecode, it has - nothing. Outside the TC area, there are parallel bars which are at 90° to the direction of film travel. They are offset so that when you have a bar on the inside, you don't have one on the outside, and the other way around. The idea is to look at the signal on the scope and then adjust for minimum signal because the bars and spaces on opposing sides will ideally cancel each other out, basically a buzz track derived concept. The difference is that the two alignment tracks are read at the same time and summed, but the same concept of having nothing in the scanning area is the same. Luciano - you can order the buzz track directly from the SMPTE website, they also ship to Brazil. When you get the film through a dealer, they do the same thing and mark it up. So just go there and order it yourself.  |  IP: Logged Gordon McLeod Film God Posts: 9532 From: Toronto Ontario Canada Registered: Jun 99 posted 12-26-2004 09:46 AM                     Steve was the old SMPTE 1k recorded at 100% mod?  |  IP: Logged Luciano Brigite Master Film Handler Posts: 277 From: Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil Registered: Jan 2002 posted 12-26-2004 11:13 AM                     I tried to scan both films but all I got was a black bar ,I don't have a film scanner,then I took the two pictures by placing the films against the computer monitor and taking a shot with the webcam that's why the high tone isn't showing .that's the leftover of my last loop of buzz track,cracks and some sprocket damage can be seen too. The second picture is what I got instead of buzz track 15Ft of a film that has no use for me and a nice loss of some good $$  |  IP: Logged Christos Mitsakis Expert Film Handler Posts: 242 From: Ag.Paraskevi, ATHENS, GREECE Registered: Sep 1999 posted 12-26-2004 11:43 AM                     Thank you Steve and Gordon, the photo doesn't show enough details (I admit, at first sight I took it as a leader with DTS code start). On a domestic print I found a tail end with a 400Hz dual lateral track at 50% modulation, apparently for level settings (and yes I did make a loop of it, regardless that I don't use it for this purpose). Dolby tone on a print tail is a rare occasion, but something that I saw once. Christos.  |  IP: Logged John Hawkinson Film God Posts: 2273 From: Cambridge, MA, USA Registered: Feb 2002 posted 12-26-2004 11:58 AM                     Steve, my experience was the 1k tone was not a very good frequency reference -- I don't remember exactly how far off it was, but I seem to recall that, in comparison with a strobe, the 1k tone was off by almost 100Hz [Edit: This is wrong. See my later post. It's more like 20Hz]. At the time, I concluded this was because the 1k tone was intended as a gain calibration tool but not a frequency calibration tool. Was I wrong, or did I have a bad batch of 1k tone? Of course, it is still useful for relative frequency measurements, or if you know what the actual frequency of the tone is... --jhawk [ 12-27-2004, 11:06 AM: Message edited by: John Hawkinson ]  |  IP: Logged Tim Reed Better Projection Pays Posts: 5246 From: Northampton, PA Registered: Sep 1999 posted 12-26-2004 12:15 PM                       John, the tone was for balancing two (or more) reproducers in a changeover environment. It wasn't even used to set them to a specific level, only to make them the same.  |  IP: Logged Steve Guttag We forgot the crackers Gromit!!! Posts: 12814 From: Annapolis, MD Registered: Dec 1999 posted 12-26-2004 09:34 PM                     Gord, I don't believe that the 1K tone (P35-SL) was recorded to a 100% level or a specified level (in the instruction document). As to its accuracy...it was not off by 100Hz (in the batches I used). I think it came in at somewhere around 997 at its worst...and closer to 1K most of the time. That said...one should always (and I think Mark G. will back me on this one) try to verify one's test materials and equipment. For instance...Cat. 69...no two batches have ever been the same, B&W or color....however much of the color stuff has had some significant problems (poor HF response...so-so balance on the tones). We even documented this for Dolby with an R-2 analyzer and comparing various B&W batches to the color batches...their response was less than enthusiastic, in my opinion though I believe they did make a correction to Cat 69P to deal with the excessive HF roll-off in response. That is one of the problems of private materials...they are only as good as the name on them. It also raises questions that if their test film is all over the place...what about the prints themselves...do the test films represent them? Here is another one...USL used to make TT-1...it looked like the old Cat. 69 (B&W) both Dolby and USL used NTAV to make their films...the level balance and azimuth didn't agree with each other. USL's TT-1 had a benefit that their PN was recorded higher But back to the 1KHz film...with Cat. 69...so long as one uses the same film for both machines...if you were running mono one could balance two projectors. If the theatre had Dolby Stereo...then setting the Dolby-Level meters would also have the machines bananced...thereby leaving P35-SL with no need. Now the Azimuth and Focus films by SMPTE (5K and 9K) did continue. For setting up a mono system...the 9KHz could allow one to set focus and azimuth rather quickly and easily with nothing more than a good booth monitor or possibly a VOM. Now that virtually all are stereo...they too are no longer needed or made. Steve  |  IP: Logged Tim Reed Better Projection Pays Posts: 5246 From: Northampton, PA Registered: Sep 1999 posted 12-27-2004 07:55 AM                       quote: Steve Guttag We even documented this for Dolby with an R-2 analyzer and comparing various B&W batches to the color batches... Better watch your step, you're walking a line very close to heresy. My friend, the Great One from Massachusetts -- whose name this forum's software won't let me mention -- was onto this years ago.  |  IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2

Printer-friendly view of this topic

Hop To: Select a Forum: Category: Operations -------------------- Digital Cinema Forum Film Handlers' Forum Large Format Forum Ground Level Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets Category: Community -------------------- Film-Yak Film Handlers' Movie Reviews The Afterlife Bob Maar's Joke-A-Thon Category: Classified -------------------- Equipment and Supplies Wanted/For Sale Help Wanted/Seeking Employment Category: System -------------------- Software Beta Testing Forum

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.