my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Single Perf Pull down

Author Topic: Single Perf Pull down David Graham Rose Expert Film Handler Posts: 187 From: Cambridge, UK Registered: Sep 2002 posted 03-09-2005 03:05 PM                     Greetings All from a somewhat damp East Anglian County I have recently been approached by E.Negus-Fancy Productions Ltd, here in the UK for some post production facilities. The setup involves a couple of Akai Digital dubbers, along with a pair of Kinoton EQ's Whilst this is no mean feat for a Professor of extended age, I hesitated to ask the question why they should wish to produce a film that was shot in 35mm with a single perforation pull down. Whilst I appreciate the cost of film stock here in the UK, what with the Chancellors recent increase in tax on film production, it amazes me why a production should stoop to shoot a film with a single perf frame. The production, which is being digitally graded, is now being scanned back to film on an Arri laser writer. My issue that I am unable to configure my Kinoton FP30EQ's to pull down at a single frame at a time for the purposes of dailies. Has anyone in the US been approached with such a request. I only know of one other company in the UK which will provide this facility, and they will not divulge the information necessary to carry out this task. For information, the aspect ratio of this production is 2.39:1 With warmest contrafibularities David  |  IP: Logged John Pytlak Film God Posts: 9987 From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922 Registered: Jan 2000 posted 03-09-2005 03:15 PM                        A format like that just doesn't make sense. The maximum image height with one-perf pulldown would be only 0.1870 inches. So for 2.39:1, we might be talking an image area that has less image area than Super-16. If budget is such an issue, why not use Super-16, which is a well established format worldwide? There are even some anamorphic lenses available if you want to fully utilize the Super-16 image area for 2.39:1.  |  IP: Logged David Graham Rose Expert Film Handler Posts: 187 From: Cambridge, UK Registered: Sep 2002 posted 03-09-2005 03:48 PM                     -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- A format like that just doesn't make sense. Greetings John You said: The maximum image height with one-perf pulldown would be only 0.1870 inches. So for 2.39:1, we might be talking an image area that has less image area than Super-16. If budget is such an issue, why not use Super-16, which is a well established format worldwide? There are even some anamorphic lenses available if you want to fully utilize the Super-16 image area for 2.39:1. Thank you for the reply. I to do not understand the logic in this either. However, the production is not my problem. My issue is how to project the dailies on this.  |  IP: Logged Stephen Furley Film God Posts: 3059 From: Coulsdon, Croydon, England Registered: May 2002 posted 03-09-2005 04:13 PM                     You could do a pair of 2.39 3-D frames side by side, but I can't think of any reason why you'd want to. About the only other reason I can think of would be to get a long running time from a single roll of camera stock, either in a stuation where reloading would be difficult, like the underwater 2-perf shots in 'Titanic', or to get a very long continuous shot, but you could get a simiilar running time with a 1200 foot load of 16mm, and 1200 foot mags are available for some cameras. You could get a much longer running time by shooting digital. Without knowing what they're trying to do it's difficult to say for sure, but I can't help feeling that there's probably a better way of doing it. This is totally non-standard, and non-standard tends to mean expensive.  |  IP: Logged Mark Gulbrandsen Resident Trollmaster Posts: 16657 From: Music City Registered: Jun 99 posted 03-09-2005 04:49 PM                     If you happen to find out that its 2 perf we have bucket fulls of 2 perf Ballantyne parts laying around down in the CLACO Dungeon. We may also have a couple of 2 perf machines still complete.... Mark @ CLACO  |  IP: Logged Steve Guttag We forgot the crackers Gromit!!! Posts: 12814 From: Annapolis, MD Registered: Dec 1999 posted 03-09-2005 09:27 PM                     Whereas you have FP-30EQ projectors, just about anything is possible.....for a price. 3-perf pull down is a standard option. (and I think that the 16mm mode is equivalent to 2-perf) Call your local Kinoton representative and ask what it would cost to modify the unit for single perf pull down. This would essentially be a custom firmware change and resetting some dip switches on the main board. Steve  |  IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

Printer-friendly view of this topic

Hop To: Select a Forum: Category: Operations -------------------- Digital Cinema Forum Film Handlers' Forum Large Format Forum Ground Level Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets Category: Community -------------------- Film-Yak Film Handlers' Movie Reviews The Afterlife Bob Maar's Joke-A-Thon Category: Classified -------------------- Equipment and Supplies Wanted/For Sale Help Wanted/Seeking Employment Category: System -------------------- Software Beta Testing Forum

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.