Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Glass- or metal-mirror, wich is best?

   
Author Topic: Glass- or metal-mirror, wich is best?
Thomas Jonsson
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 216
From: Bromolla, Sweden
Registered: Sep 2003


 - posted 06-03-2005 03:07 PM      Profile for Thomas Jonsson   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
When it comes to cold light mirrors, would you say a glass
mirror performs better than a metal mirror? The latter is
less expensive, but does it mean the quality is equally lower?

I use Cinemeccanica Zenith X4000H lamphouses, and as far as I
know glass mirrors are not available - not in Sweden, anyway, so
I havenīt been able to compare.

Thomas

 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 06-03-2005 03:17 PM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The lamphouse needs to be specifically designed to use a "glass" mirror, as the infrared energy goes through the mirror, so there should be a heat sink or heat deflector behind it to protect any components. With a metal mirror having a dichroic coating, the metal of the mirror IS the heat sink, and needs to have good airflow to keep it cool and maintain its efficiency in getting rid of the heat.

I've always felt glass mirrors were theoretically likely to have better efficiency, as you did not have the issue of all the IR being trapped by the mirror itself. But it really depends on the design of the lamphouse and efficiency of the dichroic coatings.

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 06-03-2005 04:04 PM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Glass definately gives you less heat per watt on the film itself. Glass also tends to be a more uniform reflector. However, the reflector's design is key to getting the best light out of the lamphouse/console. We have had excellent results from both metal and glass...I'm partial to the glass ones though.

 |  IP: Logged

Richard Fowler
Film God

Posts: 2392
From: Ft. Lauderdale, FL, USA
Registered: Jun 2001


 - posted 06-03-2005 06:41 PM      Profile for Richard Fowler   Email Richard Fowler   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
My personal preference is glass in a well maintained system and trained personel and metal for all popcorn operators [Big Grin] USA is metal centric and the majority of the world, glass lovers [Razz] Glass vendor quality can be an issue; I have seen some dichoric glass units looking great after three years @ 10 hours a day to coatings flying off the glass at 500 hours.

 |  IP: Logged

Louis Bornwasser
Film God

Posts: 4441
From: prospect ky usa
Registered: Mar 2005


 - posted 06-03-2005 08:09 PM      Profile for Louis Bornwasser   Author's Homepage   Email Louis Bornwasser   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
If you think about it, we had 11,000+ watts in the Super Corelite and heat was not a problem. A metal reflector in this lamphouse would have been an impossibility.

Glass reflectors were cheap to make once the production equipment was purchased. The hard part was the front coating. At Strong/Toledo this was a low tech operation.

What doomed the glass reflectors was then then-current "deep dish" reflectors. Now that we are back to a more moderate curve, it would seem that we now lack production facilities that do not cost an arm & a leg!

Louis

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 06-03-2005 08:56 PM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
What doomed the glass reflectors was then then-current "deep dish" reflectors. Now that we are back to a more moderate curve, it would seem that we now lack production facilities that do not cost an arm & a leg!

Well, there is one major west coast metal mirror manufacturer that supplies just about everyone in the States. They claim that they can design metal mirrors today that can perform exactly the same same as any given glass mirror...... so I was told by their president and chief designer......... I don't quite agree though.

Mark

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 06-03-2005 11:09 PM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Use Kinoton's "light projector" on a glass reflector and on a metal one....you will see just how ununiform Optiform (USA metal reflector manufacturer) reflectors can be. However, I've found that Optiform's reflectors are much more consistant than reflectors used to be in the 80s. Even using the old string method will show off the lack of uniformity (the reflected line has waves).

 |  IP: Logged

John Walsh
Film God

Posts: 2490
From: Connecticut, USA, Earth, Milky Way
Registered: Oct 1999


 - posted 06-04-2005 09:29 AM      Profile for John Walsh   Email John Walsh   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Glass is better, but when a bulb explodes it's 'game over.' In the USA, theaters leave bulbs in well after the warrenty has expired. This means the bulb manufacturer won't pay to replace a reflector if the bulb explodes.

But the image with glass can be really nice. It's not just better light; the focus improves too.

 |  IP: Logged

Louis Bornwasser
Film God

Posts: 4441
From: prospect ky usa
Registered: Mar 2005


 - posted 06-04-2005 09:19 PM      Profile for Louis Bornwasser   Author's Homepage   Email Louis Bornwasser   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
"Game Over" for bulb explosions in glass reflectors is exactly what we want! This guarantees excellence. Also, the technology involved SHOULD be less expensive for the glass....like it once was.

Louis

 |  IP: Logged

Michael Schaffer
"Where is the
Boardwalk Hotel?"

Posts: 4143
From: Boston, MA
Registered: Apr 2002


 - posted 06-05-2005 04:30 AM      Profile for Michael Schaffer   Author's Homepage   Email Michael Schaffer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
It's pretty much "game over" when an explosion occurs in a lamphouse with metal reflector too. Yes, you can still play, but the reflector is usally dented so badly you have to change it anyway because the image becomes too dark and too unevenly lit.

 |  IP: Logged

Sam D. Chavez
Film God

Posts: 2153
From: Martinez, CA USA
Registered: Aug 2003


 - posted 06-05-2005 11:00 AM      Profile for Sam D. Chavez   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Michael,

You are being charmingly logical and naive, but as long as any light leaves the lamphouse, management won't pay for a change of the reflector.

Also there are a large number of lazy technicians.

 |  IP: Logged

Louis Bornwasser
Film God

Posts: 4441
From: prospect ky usa
Registered: Mar 2005


 - posted 06-05-2005 12:09 PM      Profile for Louis Bornwasser   Author's Homepage   Email Louis Bornwasser   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Time here for an Amen, Amen! to Sam's reply.

 |  IP: Logged

Michael Schaffer
"Where is the
Boardwalk Hotel?"

Posts: 4143
From: Boston, MA
Registered: Apr 2002


 - posted 06-05-2005 04:08 PM      Profile for Michael Schaffer   Author's Homepage   Email Michael Schaffer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Not necessarily. I did in fact find some dented or peeled reflectors in our older projectors which had apparently been in there for a long time, and I was able to replace them without much discussion after I demoed the before/after effect.
In our new location we put in all complete Kinoton packages including the lamphouse/console with glass reflector, and while I made our owners aware of the "risk factor" of the glass reflectors, they were hit by the image quality, the brightnesss and evenness of illumination (plus stability and quietness, but that is of course an entriely different subject) like with a hammer and are now big fans of the concept.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)  
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.