Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Intermittent shoe spacing?

   
Author Topic: Intermittent shoe spacing?
Wolff King Morrow
Master Film Handler

Posts: 490
From: Denton, TX, USA
Registered: Feb 2004


 - posted 06-18-2005 05:27 AM      Profile for Wolff King Morrow   Author's Homepage   Email Wolff King Morrow   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
In the manual for the simplex 35 Millennium 2000, it states that the shoe clamp should be spaced one film thickness from the face of the intermittent sprocket when installed. I checked these and they are actually touching the face when closed, where the spring post determines how much pressure is applied. Should I re-adjust the lock screw to allow a hairline gap (one film-thickness), or are the shoes suppose to be touching the face like that?

My instinct is to go strictly by the book and re-adjust them, but why would someone have installed them to touch the face if that is not correct procedure?

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 06-18-2005 07:18 AM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I would set one that way and then check image steadiness and see how it goes. I've never had a brand new machine arrive from the factory set up that way. Some people do set them that way but it may require a bit more gate tension and this will cause premature gate band/runner wear..... something has to stop and hold the filum whilst its projected.... this can slso lead to very uneven wear of the shoes. I normally adjust them to just make contact with very slight pressure spring deflection and this generally results in a bit better image steadiness whilst running the bands at as low a tension as is possible to get that good steadiness. This is all in the friction department and the design is all a compromise one way or the other anyway(not that it is a bad design).

P.S., except for getting part numbers I would reccomend ignoring that book..... your projectors will last alot longer if you follow your own rigorous maintainance routine...... and change your oil very often and use equivelent synthetics if possible! Remember that manufacturers also love to sell replacement parts!

Mark

 |  IP: Logged

Wolff King Morrow
Master Film Handler

Posts: 490
From: Denton, TX, USA
Registered: Feb 2004


 - posted 06-18-2005 07:42 AM      Profile for Wolff King Morrow   Author's Homepage   Email Wolff King Morrow   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I'm obsessive about the oil and general maintenance. I brush out all the teeth, runners, and rollers after each and every show. I get teased by other projectionists, but I'd feel too much like some sort of pig if I threaded a dirty projector.

Anyway, I got a wild hair up my ass and wanted to check all alignments and tension, so the manual got me worried when I saw my shoes were aligned to touch the face. BTW, picture seems rock-solid with current setup.

 |  IP: Logged

Olivia Coleman
Film Handler

Posts: 53
From: Bend, OR USA
Registered: Jun 2005


 - posted 06-18-2005 05:26 PM      Profile for Olivia Coleman   Author's Homepage   Email Olivia Coleman   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I work the same machines, Wolff. Have you had any problem with prints shedding? The shoe tension can cause that if it's too tight but yes it can also make the film jump if not tight enough. I know we keep ours at one film thinkness and not on the face of the intermitten. I kinda like the saying "If it ain't broke, don't fix it." As long as your film is not being damaged and your presentaion is good, I wouldn't adjust it.

Do you have a technician for your theatre? If so, I would talk with them first.

 |  IP: Logged

Wolff King Morrow
Master Film Handler

Posts: 490
From: Denton, TX, USA
Registered: Feb 2004


 - posted 06-19-2005 02:56 AM      Profile for Wolff King Morrow   Author's Homepage   Email Wolff King Morrow   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
No technician other than calling a UCS specialist, but I tend to only do that when I cant solve the problem myself (which I've only had to call twice in 2 years).

At any rate, it hasn't caused any film shedding problems, so I may leave it as is.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)  
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.