|
|
Home
Products
Store
Forum
Warehouse
Contact Us
|
|
|
|
Author
|
Topic: Digital Projection
|
|
|
|
Frank Angel
Film God
Posts: 5305
From: Brooklyn NY USA
Registered: Dec 1999
|
posted 07-30-2005 11:15 AM
You probably want to do a search of this forum. This is a very hot topic that's been discussed extensively.
Bringing the movie that you see in a theatre from inception to the local multiplex screen is a very elaborate process encompassing many different segments of the industry, indeed many different industries, including production, distribution, marketing and exhibition. Each have multiple segments and subindustries within them that are involved in this extremely complicated process, and each have their own economic models to deal with. To pick one single element of the many-link chain and think that it can be changed without affecting all the others, many not at all in a positive way, is simplistic. You will find many members of this forum have pointed out here, that it is a downright foolish assumption.
For example, the issue of money being saved in transporting 35mm film has never EVER been an economic bottle-neck. Practically speaking, it has never been a cost that has stopped even the smallest independent film from being produced and distributed. In the overall budget of a feature film, catering meals cost more than it costs for making and shipping prints. Sure it is always nice to save money, but in terms of real costs, distribution of prints is pennies on the dollar.
And anyone who thinks that eliminating print distribution will make image distribution free, is a fool. Distributing video is never free, especially if the goal is matching the quality of the image that is possible when it's distributed on film. Creating hi-resolution video images from the original source isn't free, in fact it is VERY expensive. Distribution video isn't free; bandwidth, satellite transmission none is free; maintaining the video distribution system and its display hardware isn't free, and in the end may actually cost more than it cost to make and distribute film prints. Retrofitting entire segments of an entire industry doesn't come free. And when something isn't free, the singular issue becomes who's going to pay for it....a very serious matter that has to be answered FIRST before getting to the last stage of off-the-top-of-one's head idea of "gee, you could save money if you didn't have to make prints."
Search this forum to find a LOT more on the subject, especially on image quality or lack thereof of video vs. film.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|
|
|
|