|
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1 2 3
|
Author
|
Topic: Silver Screen and 3D
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Frank Angel
Film God
Posts: 5305
From: Brooklyn NY USA
Registered: Dec 1999
|
posted 08-25-2005 08:07 AM
On the other hand, the LCD system does cut down the light that actually gets to the eye (the lenses in there "opened" state are by no means zero light loss) so the light gain that a silver screen would give in an LCD 3D system wouldn't be a useless throw-away.
The original CinemaScope "Miracle Mirror" screen was a silver surface screen. It was part of the Fox specification for their new system and it was necessary because of the loss of light through the anamorphic lenses. It was a curved silver screen (the curve that John pointed out was also part of the CinemaScope spec and needed as he said to redirect light evenly back to the audience), but besides the curve, the one thing that distinguishes it from today's silver screens and all but eliminated the dreaded "hot spot" that is associated with and has given a bad name to silver screens, was that the Miracle Mirror screen was a lenticular surface as opposed to a purely flat silver surface.
Although I have asked techs at both Harkness and Technicote what the difference is between a lenticular silver and the flat silver screens they use today, I have not ever gotten an explanation that I can understand. I was told that lenticular silver screens are more expensive to produce. But the reason that they are no longer manufactured is because with the advent of high power xenon lamps, there is not enough demand for a very expensive high gain, no hotspot screen when you can use a much cheaper matte screen and just up your lamphouse light output.
Seems to me, if someone were to make a lenticular silver screen, it would be a perfect surface for a venue that wanted to run 3D on occasion but without compromising 2D presentation by introducing hotspots. It would allow either getting more light for standard 2D films or save $$$ by being able to reduce lamp size. Either way, it would be a plus.
Any screen manufacturers reading this?
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1 2 3
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|