my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » CP650 Sound Failing With Apogee Projector (Page 1)

This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2

Author Topic: CP650 Sound Failing With Apogee Projector William Collins Film Handler Posts: 18 From: Porirua, Wellington, New Zealand Registered: May 2006 posted 05-18-2006 12:49 AM                     Hi all, I'm after a bit of help. I have a Dolby CP650, X-90 with Apogee Projector. this fault has been gradually getting worse an i have consulted as many people as i possibly could without the use of the internet. When i start a film no matter whether its a new print or not, the fail rate of the digital sound is amazing, now at first thought i assumed there might be a focus issue and that it would run thought the entire length of the film, but as the film goes on, the fail rate declines and about 30 mins into any film its almost perfect again with the odd fail every few minutes or less. I had the same trouble with one of my other projectors recently and discovered the flywheel bolt had worked its self loose, but have checked its not that problem. what can i do, does anyone else know what the problem could be? Cheers  |  IP: Logged Sam D. Chavez Film God Posts: 2153 From: Martinez, CA USA Registered: Aug 2003 posted 05-18-2006 10:14 AM                       Which Dolby Digital reader are you using? A Dolby Cat. No. 701/702, BACP DSTR-20, or a reader in the projector? This will help to diagnose the problem.  |  IP: Logged Brian Middleton Film Handler Posts: 2 From: Madisonville, LA, USA Registered: Apr 2006 posted 05-18-2006 03:21 PM                     I've been having MAJOR headaches with this too. Our theater has 14 of these Apogee beasts using the sound readers built in the projector and CP650s. We've had sound issues on a few screens since we opened. Two of them are getting to the point now where we've had to cancel shows and give readmits. We've only been open for a little over 3 months, and our tech has already been by a few times for preventative maintenance and to fix other minor issues. The problems keep coming back, if they even get fixed at all. This is my first post here (Hi everyone!), but I've been reading through here for the past month or so trying to figure out what's wrong with these projectors. Basically, we're getting the same fail rate issues as William, but they don't seem to get any better as the film plays. Probably 5 or 6 of our projectors are showing a high fail rate (5-7's with an occasional F). At the moment, two of these projectors are constantly back and forth between a high number and F. In these theaters the sound is pretty bad. It comes out warbling, like the sound of a bad cassette tape, as mentioned before in several CP650 threads here. Those threads seemed to think that it was due to the film not running steady. We switch it back to analog SR manually, and it's a little better, but not much. I looked at our projector while it was running and I could see the film fluttering back and forth as it left the roller immediately after the intermittent, the one that the intermittent pad roller arm covers. I'd look up the technical name for that piece, but apparently it's a redesign because even our hardcopy projector manuals show a totally different assembly there. Anyway, if I put pressure on that arm assembly, pushing it closed harder, the film leaving that roller steadies and the error rate goes down to 3-4. Since I can't do that myself for the length of the feature, I tried to see what I could tighten to keep it like that. When I loosened the two hex-head screws at the back of that assembly, I was able to turn the two rollers and change the pressure where the larger roller touches that cover and where the other roller touches the intermittent itself. The question is, where should they be set to? Looking at our other projectors, even the ones that are working fine, the adjustments are all over the place. This even after our tech was out less than a week ago and supposedly did complete A-chain alignments, cleaned, and tightened everything. So, this morning, I set the bottom roller to be almost as close as possible and the top roller just about touching the intermittent. It was pretty much the only spot that seemed to make a difference. I'm worried if this might end up scratching the print or wearing things down. It did seem to fix the problem somewhat, but I'm not satisfied with it. I still get an occasional F on the CP650 and the adjustments seemed far too precise for me to believe it was supposed to work that way. This was the only thing I could find that seemed to have any effect on sound errors. Does anyone have any suggestions? I may be completely on the wrong track. I'll have to check the flywheel bolt when I go in this evening. I'm going to attempt to post a picture I took of the rollers. I took it with my camera phone, so the quality is kinda crummy, but you should be able to see what I'm talking about. You can see at the bottom of the picture where the film leaves the smaller roller and moves to the large one. That's where I can see the film bouncing up and down as the projector is running before I tightened the other two rollers (the two silver-handled ones near the center of the picture). When I turn the bottom one of the two, it pulls the red piece to the right closer to the film traveling over the roller next to it, which seems to help. Well, I hope this made some sense and I'd be grateful for any suggestions anyone might have on this.  |  IP: Logged Manny Knowles "What are these things and WHY are they BLUE???" Posts: 4247 From: Bloomington, IN, USA Registered: Feb 2002 posted 05-18-2006 04:39 PM                     If the situation repeatedly improves after about 30mins, I would be inclined to suspect that the splice between reels 1 & 2 is correcting a threading error. Find the correct threading diagram and update your manual.  |  IP: Logged David Stambaugh Film God Posts: 4021 From: Eugene, Oregon Registered: Jan 2002 posted 05-18-2006 04:44 PM                        Suggestion: Add "with Apogee Projector" to the title of this thread.  |  IP: Logged Steve Guttag We forgot the crackers Gromit!!! Posts: 12814 From: Annapolis, MD Registered: Dec 1999 posted 05-18-2006 05:04 PM                     This really does sound like a projector issue, not a processor issue. Digital electronics normally dont self-heal though cold solder joints will cause erratic behavior. The Apogee has had so many redesigns between the intermittent and the sound drum I can't imagine which one you have. If there isn't a "break sprocket" between the intermittent and the drum, you have an older design. The brake sprocket has a pad shoe that closes the film onto it and merely put drag (damping) on the film so the film steadies out after the intermittent as well as to apply tension to the film to cause the drum to have enough friction to keep up with the film. What Strong seems to be missing on this design is that they have to choose...tight loop or loose loop sound...NOT BOTH, which is what they've chosen. If they want a loose-loop, they can skip the brake sprocket and have a pinch roller (That only hits the edges of the film) and also LOOSE the flanges on the rollers after the drum. Or go with a tight loop system and come with with some proper tensioners. To investigate what the problem is, I would hook a scope up and see how it is tracking...if the data is jiggling and weaving on the scope...you have guidance issues at the scan point as well as lack of proper damping.  |  IP: Logged Richard Fowler Film God Posts: 2392 From: Ft. Lauderdale, FL, USA Registered: Jun 2001 posted 05-18-2006 05:23 PM                     Greatly agree with Steve. The scope will definately help find the problem on "which" anti-flutter roller is causing the jitter. There is another brand of projector where the side weave affects the Dolby Digital which is apparent with a scope....either due to sloppy install, wear over time or corrosion issues.  |  IP: Logged William Collins Film Handler Posts: 18 From: Porirua, Wellington, New Zealand Registered: May 2006 posted 05-19-2006 12:55 AM                     First I must point out, and to this is mainly for Manny's benefit. This problem is occouring on more than one film, and its doing it even on new prints. I didn't think about modifying the rollers that Brian mentions but i will have a look into it. BTW The Projectors were brand new, and i think were made January. So i have the same setup that Brian has essentially. Another point, I have had to start running interlocks on The Da Vinci Code, to which I had great fun sorting out. firstly I discovered that the motor controllers were sent with slightly different factory settings, so one of the projectors was accelerating a couple of seconds faster than the other. When I run an interlock test for the first time, I noticed that one of the projectors was faster than the other, as my accumulator indicated as it slowly climbed the wall! I therefore had to modify the speed settings of the motors so that they run at the same speeds. Now I have one running at 60.2 Hz and the other at 59.7Hz, and its the one with the slower speed thats having the sound issues but even with the speeds set slightly higher or even lower than 59.7Hz the sound still remains to fail, and then slowly get better. (Added Later due to forum rules not allowing me to post twice in a row!) Had a look at the rollers Brian mentions and I can't see any noticeable change in the sound quality when i apply more pressure to the friction roller. I did however try something else. The projectors I used in the job before my present one were Century's and I was told my tech that the quieter the loops sound the better for the film. This does not seem to apply in this case. I tried making my bottom loop larger in the last film I laced up and imeadiatly the sound seems better, less fail rates instead of around 7. all the time its sitting at 4. Lets see if it works on my next lace up (Added Later AGAIN! due to forum rules not allowing me to post twice in a row!) It works. it would appear all this time it was just my bottom loop after the intermittent that was causing the sound trouble. The film I noticed the problem most with, i have just laced up and started. The sound is steady at 5 now, much better than the 7-8/F I was getting before. So Brian, this maybe a point you would like to check out. I would still like to hear any other suggestions on this problem, anything else that might help get this number lower! [ 05-19-2006, 03:45 AM: Message edited by: William Collins ]  |  IP: Logged Mark Gulbrandsen Resident Trollmaster Posts: 16657 From: Music City Registered: Jun 99 posted 05-19-2006 07:10 AM                     quote: Steve Guttag The Apogee has had so many redesigns between the intermittent and the sound drum I can't imagine which one you have. Humm, I can't help but to chuckle to myself.... I told them it wouldn't work the first time I saw it. Shades of Christie P35GP..... But at least the new Christie Cone X-35 works and works VERY well, including the basement SRD reader. Mark  |  IP: Logged Mark J. Marshall Film God Posts: 3188 From: New Castle, DE, USA Registered: Aug 2002 posted 05-19-2006 08:13 AM                    Well, you could try a penthouse reader... but then you'd probably have to deal with warbling. Or just do like we do now, and just run everything in SR.  |  IP: Logged Michael Schaffer "Where is the Boardwalk Hotel?" Posts: 4143 From: Boston, MA Registered: Apr 2002 posted 05-19-2006 11:46 PM                        Or you could just get better equipment. I looked at the Apogee myself and thought the soundhead design was not very...convincing. It took me several months to convince our owners that we should rsther buy some real equipment, although it cost a little more. We finally did get 14 Kinoton FP50A with basement combo reader (which is actully cheaper than any penthouse reader, so that brings the end price down a little), and as expected, they have been running over a year without any problems. I actually went to the location last night to check the situation, but here wasn't much to do. Most of the prints ran at error rates like 1 and 2. Like my mother always says: you buy cheap - you pat twice.  |  IP: Logged Kyle Anderson Film Handler Posts: 86 From: Tyler, TX, USA Registered: Dec 2005 posted 05-23-2006 03:00 AM                     If you're getting 4-5 to F back and forth repeatedly (even on new prints), one of the things to check for is dirt stuck to the drum - screws up the scan point focus enough to fail. Had this problem for WEEKS until I finally figured it out ><  |  IP: Logged William Collins Film Handler Posts: 18 From: Porirua, Wellington, New Zealand Registered: May 2006 posted 05-23-2006 04:45 PM                     I'll check the drum again. I had some news passed on to me about my equipment a couple of days ago, that might have the answer. we had an oil leak on the projector during shipment and the holdback sproket may have had some oil get into it, which loosened it. unfortunatly for me im not confident enough to pull it apart to try resolve it as im moving on to bigger and better things next wednesday, though it would be nice to have it fixed so keep the ideas on how to sort it coming!  |  IP: Logged Brian Middleton Film Handler Posts: 2 From: Madisonville, LA, USA Registered: Apr 2006 posted 05-23-2006 09:58 PM                     Finally got a chance to run up to the booth again to check on a few things. Won't be working a shift up there till Thursday, so I'll have more time then to really work on it. Still having the really poor sound on that one projector. Not quite warbling as bad as it was before I tightened the rollers, but still pretty bad. According to the updated page I found in our manual, I'm supposed to leave two film thicknesses between the rollers I adjusted, so I do have them a little too close, but it's the only thing making it tolerable and it doesn't seem to be damaging the print. I checked briefly for dirt on the drum and other rollers, but didn't find any. On that one projector, I can still see the film bouncing slightly at the point I mentioned in my first post. I'll experiment more with loop sizes next shift. I thread 'up' with pretty much identical loops on every projector, and only these few are giving me problems. Another thing I should mention, because I just realized how bad it is, some (i.e. most) of these projectors have a fairly unsteady picture. I just watched Da Vinci Code at another theater last night and the picture was rock solid, the credits rolled smooth as silk. On our machines, I don't think I've ever seen credits that weren't jumpy. Up/down and even side to side. On one projector that's particularly bad, the CP650 immediately reverts to SR. Looking at the projector, I don't see the bouncing where I do on that first projector, but it's there after the next roller, the one barely visible at the lower left of the picture above. From my limited experience, my first thought would be to increase the film tension. Looking at the indicator, most of the projectors are already adjusted towards the middle of the range. I mentioned that to one of the other operators and he said they were specifically told by the tech not to mess with the tension. Is there anything else that I can check to help steady the film? Should the tension need to be that high on these units? Our tech was just out a couple weeks ago for the scheduled preventative maintenance, but these issues have been ongoing pretty much since we opened. Also, another somewhat related CP650 issue that's been bugging me. All of our 650s are calibrated such that 5.0 is the 'proper' volume, and we are instructed to leave it set there unless there are complaints. 7.0 is definitely too loud. Does that seem odd? Looking through the manual, it seems that after the extensive calibration required for these units, setting them to 7.0 would use those calibrated levels exactly. How do you calibrate one of these to rest at 5.0? Well, that's pretty much it for this update. Thank y'all for bearing through my long posts and thanks for all the suggestions. Just trying to get an acceptable presentation out of these things.  |  IP: Logged Sean McKinnon Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1712 From: Peabody Massachusetts Registered: Sep 2000 posted 05-23-2006 10:30 PM                        The proper calibration point for A Dolby processor is "7". This had to do when they used linear potentiometers, and to attain a good signal to noise ratio. If your system was calibrated at 5 all that means is that the Sound Pressure Levels were set to 85db (per channel, except the subwoofer which is not set using an spl meter) with the fader set at 5.0, In order to calibrate it at "7" you would have to reset the output gains on each channel with the CP650 set-up software. I dont think (but I may be wrong) that with the digital faders used by Dolby now that setting the fader at 5 would add more S/N so I dont think it compromises your system to not have them set at 7, the only problem is that almost everyone calibrates at "7" (Any CP adjustments or repairs should only be done by a qualified service engineer with suitable test equipment.)  |  IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2

Printer-friendly view of this topic

Hop To: Select a Forum: Category: Operations -------------------- Digital Cinema Forum Film Handlers' Forum Large Format Forum Ground Level Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets Category: Community -------------------- Film-Yak Film Handlers' Movie Reviews The Afterlife Bob Maar's Joke-A-Thon Category: Classified -------------------- Equipment and Supplies Wanted/For Sale Help Wanted/Seeking Employment Category: System -------------------- Software Beta Testing Forum

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.