|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
Author
|
Topic: Are digital intermediates uncompressed?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John Hawkinson
Film God
Posts: 2273
From: Cambridge, MA, USA
Registered: Feb 2002
|
posted 05-29-2006 08:34 AM
For clarity, Mike and Bobby said two different things. I believe Mike is incorrect when he answers Frank, "4K is a value....of what?"; "Lines of vertical resolution "
It is 4K pixels per line.
Frank, it's a sad reality that people use the term "4K" a lot, so it's come into our speech without more clear units. But please don't make up a new abbreviation -- that will just engender lots of confusion (especially if it's wrong ).
Bobby went on to say, "The newest implementations of LZW use some of the same tricks utilized by the GIF format." Err, LZW is the compression format used by GIF. This doesn't make a lot of sense, seeing as GIF's compression hasn't changed since 1989 (or 1987, depending on how you look at it).
--jhawk
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|