my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Apogee Sucks

Author Topic: Apogee Sucks Robert E. Allen Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1078 From: Checotah, Oklahoma Registered: Jul 2002 posted 07-01-2006 01:25 PM                     I recently took ove as GM of a community owned theatre in northeastern Iowa. The non-profit corporation behind it did a fantastic job of restoring a closed forties single screener. They installed the best of everything including Dolby digital. However, having threaded just about every brand of projector for 26 years I find the Apogee a real pain, especially the bottom loop that is so small it ocassionally snaps splices. Has anyone had similar experiences and does anyone know why Strong designed the machine that way? If this is supposed to be a Simplex it's the worst ever produced. And what's with the film riding on those stupid straps instead of between rails in a gate?  |  IP: Logged Louis Bornwasser Film God Posts: 4441 From: prospect ky usa Registered: Mar 2005 posted 07-01-2006 05:12 PM                        My big complaint is that these new machines were designed for "convenience of manufacturing;" not by knowledgeable techs and users through their input/testing. Could be worse: remember the XL II? Louis  |  IP: Logged Steve Guttag We forgot the crackers Gromit!!! Posts: 12814 From: Annapolis, MD Registered: Dec 1999 posted 07-01-2006 06:49 PM                     Actually, the Apogee was from the result of asking techs and end users. It was also, from what I can tell, from looking at what is out there from other countries. Like with all projection equipment, it has its ups and downs. The picture it puts out can be very steady. The ones I've laid my hands on need work on the sound department. I also don't like the fact that there isn't any place to land greenfield for the sound. We don't run naked cables all over, including sound (analog or digital). I know Strong has been working on the sound issue (takes about 30 seconds to come up to speed) as well as they've done some work on the film path below the intermittent. As such, I have not seen a current machine in operation.  |  IP: Logged Mark Gulbrandsen Resident Trollmaster Posts: 16657 From: Music City Registered: Jun 99 posted 07-01-2006 07:06 PM                     Robert, I thought you were in Poulsbo? Humm... Poulsbo to Iowa... thats a huge change of scenery... I hope you like corn! quote: Steve Guttag Actually, the Apogee was from the result of asking techs and end users. That is true but they must have lost the notes they took. quote: Steve Guttag I also don't like the fact that there isn't any place to land Greenfield for the sound. We don't run naked cables all over, including sound (analog or digital). True! And its illegal in all the States that I work in not to have them completely enclosed. quote: My big complaint is that these new machines were designed for "convenience of manufacturing;" Louis, I couldn't agree more... merely a recompilation of standard Simplex sub assemblies! I would go with the latest Christie incarnation any day over the Apogee. The Cine X-35's we've installed have proven to be completely reliable machines that require so little maintenance as to finally perform as Christie originally advertised the P-35. It also easily outperforms the Apogee in all aspects. Even the Christie's new style round tooth belts are now very long lived... measured in years of life. Mark  |  IP: Logged Michael Schaffer "Where is the Boardwalk Hotel?" Posts: 4143 From: Boston, MA Registered: Apr 2002 posted 07-01-2006 07:30 PM                        quote: Steve Guttag It was also, from what I can tell, from looking at what is out there from other countries. Very diplomaitcally put. Anyone who knows the Ernemann line of projectors will see they "quoted" quite a few details from them. That is basically OK, of course. Everyone takes ideas and inspiration from everyone else. But if you want that kind of projector, you can just go with the Ernemann and get a, sorry better manufactured machine. I personally believe they went into the wrong direction, at least as far as the soundhead design is concerned. I think you should develop towards more simplicity as advanced manufacturing with lower tolerances and most importantly, new materials become available. Each generation should be more "to the point" than the last. This philosophy has been, on the whole, very nicely demonstrated by the increasingly simple and concise designs Kinoton have produced over the last decades.  |  IP: Logged Robert E. Allen Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1078 From: Checotah, Oklahoma Registered: Jul 2002 posted 07-02-2006 12:19 AM                     Yes, Mark, it kinda surprised me too. If you had of asked me a few months ago I wouldn't have thought it. But it's a beautiful little town and just the kind of theatre I want. I have about all the freedom I need to run it the way I want and it's in great shape. And it is actually a profitable operation. It's a .99 cent house that grossed more than a quarter of a million last year. Our tech says he has some modification kits for the Apogee. I hope one of them has something to do with expanding the lower loop. It uses a 2k Strong Super Lumex and puts out a bright, steady picture. We're running "Cars" this week and I've never seen a brighter picture anywhere - not even at the Regal house in Poulsbo.  |  IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

Printer-friendly view of this topic

Hop To: Select a Forum: Category: Operations -------------------- Digital Cinema Forum Film Handlers' Forum Large Format Forum Ground Level Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets Category: Community -------------------- Film-Yak Film Handlers' Movie Reviews The Afterlife Bob Maar's Joke-A-Thon Category: Classified -------------------- Equipment and Supplies Wanted/For Sale Help Wanted/Seeking Employment Category: System -------------------- Software Beta Testing Forum

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.