Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Night At The Museum - Scene Framing Composition Variations

   
Author Topic: Night At The Museum - Scene Framing Composition Variations
Mark J. Marshall
Film God

Posts: 3188
From: New Castle, DE, USA
Registered: Aug 2002


 - posted 01-12-2007 09:07 AM      Profile for Mark J. Marshall     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I meant to post this a week or two ago, but kept forgetting about it. I walked past Night At The Museum the other day, and the scene looked like it was mis-framed, but only by a little bit. Some of the character's heads were cut off, and there were other clues that tell a seasoned projectionist that the framing is off. Before turning the knob, I looked at it, and it was in the proper position. I watched the movie, and the next scene looked fine. I watched for a little while longer, and various other scenes looked like they had the same "out of frame" problem.

Anyone else notice that, or is it just me?

 |  IP: Logged

Monte L Fullmer
Film God

Posts: 8367
From: Nampa, Idaho, USA
Registered: Nov 2004


 - posted 01-13-2007 01:53 AM      Profile for Monte L Fullmer   Email Monte L Fullmer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
...wonder if lab printing is at fault, for I've seen printed films that the frameline isn't dead center inbetween the two representive sprocketholes.

The frameline is either higher, or lower instead of being in dead center ...

Next time you notice this, see where the scene and frameline comparison to the print when looking in the framebox while in operation when these sequences comes across on the screen.

Kinda of a bummer that the thing is in FLAT, due to the SCOPE trailers made the movie look real good...

-Monte

 |  IP: Logged

Alex Grueneberg
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 125
From: Chicago, IL
Registered: Aug 2004


 - posted 01-13-2007 02:18 AM      Profile for Alex Grueneberg   Author's Homepage   Email Alex Grueneberg   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
edit: off topic.

[ 01-15-2007, 02:09 AM: Message edited by: Alex Grueneberg ]

 |  IP: Logged

Frank Angel
Film God

Posts: 5305
From: Brooklyn NY USA
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 01-14-2007 08:57 AM      Profile for Frank Angel   Author's Homepage   Email Frank Angel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Mark, don't go by a marking on the frame adjust knob. That isn't an absolute -- someone might have adjusted it incorrectly and only a slight differnce can indeed cut off heads in a print where some scene compostions are very tight. The better gauge is: is the frameline sitting exactly where it's supposed to be when you thread up or as Monte points out, when you inspect the print, are the framelines EXACTLY centered between two sprocket holes, and yet heads are STILL chopped off on the screen? Are you sure that this particular system is right on the money in terms of properly cut plates and screen masking? Not every installation winds up giving a perfect 1.85 on the screen - some cheat -- and whereas in 90% of the films it won't be obvious that there is a slight extra crop top-to-bottom, in a very tight shot it will show up. Is this system actually giving you 1.85 on the screen -- this isn't one of those 2:1 abominations is it....you know, where both scope and flat are projected at 2:1, s it? As Monte points out, lab errors do occur, but those are rare and far between....I'd put my money on 1) simply the framing adjustment is slightly off or 2) the system is giving you slightly under 1.85 on the screen -- those before a lab error.

 |  IP: Logged

Gordon McLeod
Film God

Posts: 9532
From: Toronto Ontario Canada
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 01-14-2007 09:09 AM      Profile for Gordon McLeod   Email Gordon McLeod   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
It is possible that it was printed on a bidirectional printer that runs forward and reverse and there can be a slight frame line difference between directions
But that displacement is still well within the safe area for set of appertures cut to proper SMPTE specs

 |  IP: Logged

Mark J. Marshall
Film God

Posts: 3188
From: New Castle, DE, USA
Registered: Aug 2002


 - posted 01-14-2007 11:13 PM      Profile for Mark J. Marshall     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Thanks for the replies, guys.

The frame knob is ok. I check it to make sure it's adjusted correctly after every start. Some yahoo here used to mess them up all the time, although I don't think it was on purpose. So now I just check them every time I start the show. It's pretty easy to adjust our "Coming Soon" snipe, and then check the knob to make sure it's right.

It's not the whole movie that's out. Just some scenes look off vertically. Maybe I'm just too picky. [Frown]

 |  IP: Logged

Monte L Fullmer
Film God

Posts: 8367
From: Nampa, Idaho, USA
Registered: Nov 2004


 - posted 01-15-2007 01:50 PM      Profile for Monte L Fullmer   Email Monte L Fullmer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Just for reference's sake, I run a loop of 35PA (RP-40) to see where my frame to center of screen relationship is, then I have place a piece of cuefoil on the face of the knob at the "6'o-clock" position with the corresponding mark on the case of the soundhead (Simplex35 and 5 Star soundhead - one can do similar with other makes) to ensure dead-center default framing.

[ 01-15-2007, 05:56 PM: Message edited by: Monte L Fullmer ]

 |  IP: Logged

Jason Whyte
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 132
From: Victoria, BC, Canada
Registered: Sep 2002


 - posted 01-16-2007 04:34 AM      Profile for Jason Whyte   Author's Homepage   Email Jason Whyte   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I saw the movie recently with the projector perfectly in frame and also noticed some very odd framing at points in the movie, as well as a very slight hard matte at the bottom of the screen on a couple of effects shots.

It appears to me that the film was shot in Super 35 with the intention of releasing it in Scope 2.39 (I saw a trailer on a Fox DVD where it was letterboxed to that ratio), and then at the last second it was decided to be released it in the 1.85:1 ratio instead.

Just a guess.

Jason

 |  IP: Logged

Cameron Glendinning
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 845
From: West Ryde, Sydney, NSW Australia
Registered: Dec 2005


 - posted 01-16-2007 05:50 AM      Profile for Cameron Glendinning   Email Cameron Glendinning   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I worked on a super 35mm production shot with pana arri cameras (arriflex camera modified for panavision lenses and 24 volt batteries, arri is 12v) as the camera trainee/ video split operator.
The split and video playback would occasionally be knocked out of allignment, we realised what was happening after the director would ask the operator to frame up a bit ect. This did effect a few of the shots that were used in the final edit.

 |  IP: Logged

Mark J. Marshall
Film God

Posts: 3188
From: New Castle, DE, USA
Registered: Aug 2002


 - posted 01-16-2007 09:31 AM      Profile for Mark J. Marshall     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Thanks, Jason.

 |  IP: Logged

Tony Ratcliff
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 216
From: Madison, IN, USA
Registered: Mar 2002


 - posted 01-18-2007 01:31 PM      Profile for Tony Ratcliff   Email Tony Ratcliff   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I had something similar with my print of Casino Royale, except it was with a whole reel.
Reel 3 was ever so slightly out of frame with the others.
The first time I ran it I thought something was wrong with the projector. I adjusted the framing to fix it for that show, then after the show put the framing knob back to normal.
The next show it did the same thing on reel 3.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)  
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.