|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
Author
|
Topic: licensed electricians
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joel N. Weber II
Expert Film Handler
Posts: 115
From: Somerville, MA, USA
Registered: Dec 2005
|
posted 03-02-2007 09:06 PM
You might also consider talking to a lawyer.
I've heard of a CLEC somewhere in Massachusetts that apparently had their town's electrical inspector show up, and this CLEC's lawyer explained that, as a LEC, they weren't sure they had to allow the inspector to inspect the building, and asked when the last time was that the electrical inspector had visited the Verizon CO, and apparently at this point the electrical inspector left in disgust without inspecting the building. Someone at the same CLEC has claimed that wiring under 50V does not require any license, although I am not sure whether this is really reliable information.
But phone companies are a special case to some extent: if the city's inspector shuts down a central office over some wiring technicality, that might lead to 911 calls not getting through, which may well be a bigger safety problem.
If you do get an electrician involved in doing extensive low voltage wiring, I suspect you want to pick the electrician carefully, because there are probably some who can do a good job of figuring out how to do low voltage wiring, and others who are better off sticking to the 120V/208V/270V/480V etc that they've done a million times before.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Louis Bornwasser
Film God
Posts: 4441
From: prospect ky usa
Registered: Mar 2005
|
posted 03-03-2007 10:06 AM
My experience mirrors Brad's. Occasionally the electrician is EXCELLENT. Most of the time he is very bad or not even there at all on installation days. Always, he is happy there is someone to take the responsibility on expensive equipment. Usually he is rushed on other facets of the building wiring.
I don't even think of going out of town without conduit, benders, wire, Liquidtite, etc in case the electrician "can't order" these things or worst of all doesn't show up as expected on installation day. Remember, the job is running behind, but the opening is scheduled; leaving, on one occasion, 5 days to install a 10 plex with digital. (2 men, we made it...barely)
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
Frank Angel
Film God
Posts: 5305
From: Brooklyn NY USA
Registered: Dec 1999
|
posted 03-04-2007 03:20 PM
Like what Phil B. said -- similar here in New York City, the test for Motion Picture Projectionist Licence was under the authority of the Bureau of Gas and Electricity -- the same entity that licensed electricians. The projectionist license included a substantial knowledge of the electrical code and basic electrical theory. The license, at least back when I got mine, allowed the projectionist to do hookups of all projection equipment right up to the breaker boxes. A licensed electrician had to wire mains and breakers and such.
I am sure today's projectionist license has no such electrician equivilance provision. The license has been so watered down and has been removed from the original Gas and Electricity agency and moved to the Department of Consumer Affairs and instead of being a license for safety control, it is now simply a money generating vehicle for the City. Seeing who they give the projectionist licence to today, I certainly wouldn't want any of them touching anything electrical except maybe a breaker ON-Off switch....even that's pretty risky.
When we first put in our original Peerless lamphouses, the college electrician got wind of it he was all in my face and demanded that only he could do the wiring. No problem; have at it, was my attitude. So he wired up the lamphouses and, golly, the arc would just sputter and wouldn't stay lit. Seems the hot-shot licensed electician had wired plus to minus. Once he was gone, I just rewired them and didn't say anything about it....I was a newbee and wasn't going to come off with a wise-ass attitude, although in my mind I could hear Paul's line in HELP!, "You've FAILED, scientist!"
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|