my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Digital 3D more expensive than conventional 35mm?

Author Topic: Digital 3D more expensive than conventional 35mm? Christopher Meredith Expert Film Handler Posts: 126 From: Jackson, MS, USA Registered: Apr 2006 posted 03-22-2007 08:11 PM                        A higher-up in our company recently claimed that the Digital 3D versions of "Meet the Robinsons" is vastly more expensive to show than the conventional 2D 35mm version of the movie and this is why theaters that are showing it are charging $2.50 more per ticket. What makes a 3D digital movie that expensive that it would dwarf the costs of print production and distribution?  |  IP: Logged Peter Mork Expert Film Handler Posts: 181 From: Newton, MA, USA Registered: Jun 2002 posted 03-22-2007 08:53 PM                     Well, 'cause it's, y'know, digital. Patience, little one. "Robinsons On Ice" will come to your town soon enough, it will cost less, AND it's 3d!  |  IP: Logged Ken Lackner Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1907 From: Atlanta, GA, USA Registered: Sep 2001 posted 03-22-2007 09:02 PM                     I am in no way involved with purchasing equipment or booking film, so I cannot say for certain, but my guess why it would be so much more expensive is because of the initial cost of the equipment. Not only do you have to pay for a digital projector and server, but you need a Real D system and a silver screen, the latter being very expensive.  |  IP: Logged Mike Olpin Chop Chop! Posts: 1852 From: Dallas, TX Registered: Jan 2002 posted 03-22-2007 09:03 PM                     Initially the cost will be higer for a few years while the exhibitors try to recover the initial capital required to go with digital 3D. Digital 3D requires several expensive components beyond regular digital cinema including a silver screen.  |  IP: Logged Steve Guttag We forgot the crackers Gromit!!! Posts: 12814 From: Annapolis, MD Registered: Dec 1999 posted 03-22-2007 09:03 PM                     The digital equipment is vastly more expensive than the film equipment (just read many threads on this)...then there is the 3-D aspect...cost of glasses, upkeep, polarizing unit (if Real-D then you have an initial investment payment to them plus yearly payments or there another deal that involves a percentage of the box). Since when HASN'T digital projection been vastly more expensive than film projection? Steve  |  IP: Logged Christopher Meredith Expert Film Handler Posts: 126 From: Jackson, MS, USA Registered: Apr 2006 posted 03-22-2007 09:57 PM                        I was assuming that the theaters in question already had a D cinema setup and that the cost discussion was over and above their "normal" digital cinema presentation. I guess a silver screen and polarizing unit would be rather expensive. Guess that answers the question! Thanks!  |  IP: Logged David Zylstra Master Film Handler Posts: 432 From: Novi, MI, USA Registered: Mar 2007 posted 03-22-2007 10:56 PM                     I was involved in my company's decision to get 2 RealD systems . . . . it is not cheap - the RealD side of the system is not purchased, it's leased/licensed with a large initial capital outlay . . . so far we have not even come close to recouping our costs after Monster House and Nightmare, we are hoping MTR will do well. We were lucky in that we already had digital projectors on all our screens . . . .  |  IP: Logged Bobby Henderson "Ask me about Trajan." Posts: 10973 From: Lawton, OK, USA Registered: Apr 2001 posted 03-23-2007 11:47 AM                     Lack of content is the biggest problem for RealD. After Meet the Robinsons, it's probably going to be November before most RealD equipped theaters get another show. That's when Beowulf is supposed to open. Further hurting the system is lack of more grown-up oriented fare in 3D. The bulk of RealD shows thus far has been CGI animated movies for kids. Where are the 3D movies for teens and grown-ups? The horror movie genre is something that has used 3D well in the past. How come newer horror movies aren't trying to utilize the process? A good number of action movies and even some comedies would play well in 3D. Of course, the catch is the movie has to actually be shot for 3D using two camera systems for the process to work properly. Screw any of that "we'll expand it to 3D in post" baloney. Old 3D movies could be revisited in RealD for midnight movie showings. I recall a theater here in Lawton trying to show Friday the 13th: Part III in 3D as a midnight movie attraction and the engagement was a horrible ordeal. The print was in absolutely shitty shape, badly faded and riddled with lots of splices here and there. Every time a splice came through the projector the 3D was thrown out of sync. Using RealD, one could revisit those old 3D movies that were a pain in the ass to try to show and be able to run them without a hitch. The part 3 installment of Friday the 13th looked great in 3D, when I saw it back in 1982. It might be able to look great again, provided Paramount Pictures has good quality originals to draft into RealD. Anyway, for RealD to gain traction it needs more than just several hundred equipped theaters. The format needs a lot more content. With a regular stream of content the hardware lease and royalty costs might not seem so bad.  |  IP: Logged Mark Lensenmayer Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1605 From: Upper Arlington, OH Registered: Sep 1999 posted 03-23-2007 12:02 PM                     It would be nice to see some of the old 3-D films in Real-D. It would have to be selective, though...HOUSE OF WAX would work well, but some of the old stuff like CHARGE AT FEATHER RIVER and KISS ME KATE would not find much of an audience. The n-Wave 3-D package locally played all day for a week, then shifted to a single showing in the early afternoon. We must remember, though, that most people don't come out to see 3-D, they come out to see an entertaining movie. If the movie sucks, it won't do any business. If MEET THE ROBINSON'S turns out to be a bad movie, there are going to be lots of empty 3-D theatres out there.  |  IP: Logged Mike Olpin Chop Chop! Posts: 1852 From: Dallas, TX Registered: Jan 2002 posted 03-23-2007 02:49 PM                     Actually, Real D has a slate of great specialty films for the summer, including two National Geographic documentries, and the U23D concert. At ShoWest, they showed clips from each of them, and they all looked excellent. National Geographic: ROAR! Lions of the Kalahari (converted from IMAX) Real D available Spring 2007 National Geographic: Sea Monsters October 2007 U23D: Summer, date unknown. If I understand correctly, the National Geographic films should allow for flexible booking, so you could hold off on Lions until after Meet the Robbinsons dies off.  |  IP: Logged David Zylstra Master Film Handler Posts: 432 From: Novi, MI, USA Registered: Mar 2007 posted 03-23-2007 03:24 PM                     There is potential . . . . only question is how much exhibitors will be required to pay in "alternative content" fees . . . RealD wants their share, AccessIT wants their share, National Geographic wants their share, not much left for exhibitors . . . I understand the 3D process that generates the Imax 3D scenes can be used for digital projection as well - rumor is that Lucas may re-release all episodes of Star Wars in 3D . . . . could be interesting to see if it happens.  |  IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

Printer-friendly view of this topic

Hop To: Select a Forum: Category: Operations -------------------- Digital Cinema Forum Film Handlers' Forum Large Format Forum Ground Level Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets Category: Community -------------------- Film-Yak Film Handlers' Movie Reviews The Afterlife Bob Maar's Joke-A-Thon Category: Classified -------------------- Equipment and Supplies Wanted/For Sale Help Wanted/Seeking Employment Category: System -------------------- Software Beta Testing Forum

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.