my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Frame not stable on screen shaky image (Page 1)

This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2

Author Topic: Frame not stable on screen shaky image Michael Moore Expert Film Handler Posts: 188 From: Dover, DE / USA Registered: Jun 2006 posted 05-02-2007 06:38 PM                        Frame not stable on screen shaky image I am new to this forum, however I have been projecting film for on and off for the past 10 years or so. I am currently head projectionist at the Schwartz Center for the Arts in dover Delaware. We are running are films on a super simplex with a Speco LP 270 platter. I had to recently replace my intermittent as well as several of the fiber gears because the intermittent star gear cracked during a show. I now have a new problem I never had before. The image is shaky on the screen, and it seems to be worse on some movies then others. I have tried to increase tension on the springs behind the pads but this did not help. I tried the use a different film gate al together but this does not solve the problem. At some point we are getting a grant to replace the super with a century. Until that day arrives I have to live with what I have. Does anyone have any tricks to fix a problem like this? Thank you Mike  |  IP: Logged Mark Gulbrandsen Resident Trollmaster Posts: 16657 From: Music City Registered: Jun 99 posted 05-02-2007 06:50 PM                     Michael... we really need more specific info... Is the image shaky up and down or side to side or both? Was this shake concurrent with the installation of the new intermittent? Are all the gears meshed properly and did you check to see if any of the shafts were bent before replacing the gears? The Super is no slouch in spite of its age... I'd put up a well running Super any day against any projector out there. Also... "May the Schwartz be with you"... I just had to say that! Mark  |  IP: Logged Tim Reed Better Projection Pays Posts: 5246 From: Northampton, PA Registered: Sep 1999 posted 05-02-2007 08:50 PM                       Maybe I'm reading you wrong, but it sounds like you replaced the starwheel?! That operation requires high-precision parts, procedures, and adjustments. If you replaced the entire movement with a spare, however, it could be that it was bad to begin with. Is the intermittent sprocket secure on the shaft? Does it have even the least little play while in the dwell position? (Oh, and make sure there's enough oil in the intermittent casing... maybe that goes without saying, but you did say you've been on and off .) I would look to the intermittent as the source of the image unsteadiness, rather than the gate.  |  IP: Logged Mark Gulbrandsen Resident Trollmaster Posts: 16657 From: Music City Registered: Jun 99 posted 05-02-2007 09:04 PM                     quote: Michael Moore I had to recently replace my intermittent as well as several of the fiber gears because the intermittent star gear cracked during a show. Tim, Somehow I derived from his post that he replaced the intermittent and some of the fibre gears.... I don't see that he replaced the starwheel itself. MArk  |  IP: Logged Michael Moore Expert Film Handler Posts: 188 From: Dover, DE / USA Registered: Jun 2006 posted 05-02-2007 11:06 PM                        The shakiness is up and down no side to side. I did not replace the star gear. I discovered the star gear was destroyed after taking the intermittent apart. I'm a machinist by hobby and partially by trade, I have more then enough tools to overhaul a projector and make parts as well, however I have never replaced just the star gear I'm sure I can; but I never needed to so never tried. I checked the shafts they are all strait. All gears mesh well. The intermittent moves very smooth. I religiously oil and recheck oil every time I show a movie. I project every Wednesday, and Sunday. Fridays are my cleaning and maintenance day. The intermittent I replaced it with was one we had in a box. It was sold to us as "refurbished" about 4 years ago. I replaced the fiber gears with ones from our spare projector head we have. It could be the intermittent I guess. I have another intermittent that came out of the other projector head a while back. I put it in a box for safe keeping. Maybe I can replace it with that one to compare? The film I projected tonight was really bad. I projected Venus, Last week I projected The Queen and it was not as bad. I also noticed that reel two was the least shaky and reel 6 was the worst. Credits were really telling of how shaky the image is. I suspect this is because credits are words and they are moving up May the Schwartz be with you too [ 05-03-2007, 11:34 AM: Message edited by: Michael Moore ]  |  IP: Logged Louis Bornwasser Film God Posts: 4441 From: prospect ky usa Registered: Mar 2005 posted 05-03-2007 03:10 AM                        I agree that the Super is more than the equal of most new projectors. Howevedr, in the interest of expediency and also reducing oil usage, I would use this as an "excuse" to go ahead with the Century. Beautifully rebuilt ones are commonplace if you are careful. Louis  |  IP: Logged Monte L Fullmer Film God Posts: 8367 From: Nampa, Idaho, USA Registered: Nov 2004 posted 05-03-2007 03:44 AM                     Gate tension? Have to remember that polyester stock is a shade thinner than the acetate stock so that gate tension might have to be increased a bit esp with good ol SuperSimplex units...and that is the shoe tension spring in as well as the gate tension springs. Yea' doing an intermittent rebuild on a Super was my first time I did a rebuild on any projector..and learning about taper pin usage...at 23yrs old (intermittent sprocket was hooking badly...). After the rebuild, that Super ran tons more smoothly-not bad for a first timer. - Monte  |  IP: Logged Michael Moore Expert Film Handler Posts: 188 From: Dover, DE / USA Registered: Jun 2006 posted 05-03-2007 07:40 AM                        What I am going to do is adjust the pad tension again, the shoe tension was not readjusted when I did this last. In fact I never changed it when I installed the newer intermittent, this might be the issue. I will check that out tomorrow when I clean. Let you guys know what happens. Mike  |  IP: Logged Mark Gulbrandsen Resident Trollmaster Posts: 16657 From: Music City Registered: Jun 99 posted 05-03-2007 08:23 AM                     It has to be a bad intermittent!! Don't waste time adjusting things on this one until you've tried another movement. If you need one let me know. We have a couple of boxes full of them and a couple dozen complete Supers in the basement to rob from. BTW: I know that grants take a looooong tome to aquire so you may have to fix this one again... Mark  |  IP: Logged Tim Reed Better Projection Pays Posts: 5246 From: Northampton, PA Registered: Sep 1999 posted 05-03-2007 10:04 AM                       quote: Mark Gulbrandsen I don't see that he replaced the starwheel itself. Mark, he said the star had cracked, so: He had to have had the movement apart to know this. He said he was "on and off" in the booth. He said there was now lots of unsteadiness in the picture. In the vernacular of someone unfamiliar with certain terms, "replace intermittent" could mean replace the defective part, since... Lots of old booths had spare stars and cams in the parts cabinet... You tell me.  |  IP: Logged Tim Reed Better Projection Pays Posts: 5246 From: Northampton, PA Registered: Sep 1999 posted 05-03-2007 10:04 AM                       geez!  |  IP: Logged Tim Reed Better Projection Pays Posts: 5246 From: Northampton, PA Registered: Sep 1999 posted 05-03-2007 10:04 AM                       geez!  |  IP: Logged Michael Moore Expert Film Handler Posts: 188 From: Dover, DE / USA Registered: Jun 2006 posted 05-03-2007 10:24 AM                        First I am in the booth about three times a week sometime four. I have been keeping this schedule for about 4 years now; I got back into projection when the Schwartz Center was renovated. Before that last time I was in a booth was about 2 years before. Second when projector broke I was not in the booth, my assistant was projecting, and I was in Florida for Radiation Safety Training so I did not see what happen. Third when I returned I had to troubleshoot why the fiber gears were striped. Intermittent did not rotate at all, so I thought that was the problem. It was suspect so I removed it. I did not disassemble it at first; I replaced the entire intermittent assay not the starwheel with a refurbished intermittent as well as the gears. Fourth I then tinkered with the seized up intermittent to see why it was in this state. Disassembled and discovered the starwheel was cracked. This was the newer style starwheel; I could tell because the sprocket was attached to the shaft via a single bolt and nut not the two tapered pins. I have an additional intermittent that was not working well from the spare projector head and I want to try it out. I may take you guys up on the other intermittent you offered if I can't get the other one to work. But you guys think it’s the intermittent and not the gate? Mike  |  IP: Logged Mark Gulbrandsen Resident Trollmaster Posts: 16657 From: Music City Registered: Jun 99 posted 05-03-2007 10:28 AM                     Tim... I just have to rub it in . Its pretty plain that he said he replaced the intermittent. I don't see any vernaculars coming into play in that line. Now lets take NASA for instance... When they say they launched the space shuttle they HAVE launched it... they didn't just replace the LH2 turbopump on one of the rocket engines and then test fire it. His line as copied over from above is quite literal..."I had to recently replace my intermittent as well as several of the fiber gears because the intermittent star gear cracked during a show." Does it say he replaced the star in that line? It just says he knows the star cracked during a show... BUT... it does say he replaced some of the fibre gears... quite common to have to do when just about any movement piles up! Am still trying to figure out what on and off in the booth has to do with any of this.... This is about picture bounce not on and off projection work as many of the projectionists out there seem to do. What I am offering is to send him a good movement if he decides to take me up on it. May the Schwartz also be with you . Mark  |  IP: Logged Jack Ondracek Film God Posts: 2348 From: Port Orchard, WA, USA Registered: Oct 2002 posted 05-03-2007 10:55 AM                        Now boyz....  |  IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2

Printer-friendly view of this topic

Hop To: Select a Forum: Category: Operations -------------------- Digital Cinema Forum Film Handlers' Forum Large Format Forum Ground Level Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets Category: Community -------------------- Film-Yak Film Handlers' Movie Reviews The Afterlife Bob Maar's Joke-A-Thon Category: Classified -------------------- Equipment and Supplies Wanted/For Sale Help Wanted/Seeking Employment Category: System -------------------- Software Beta Testing Forum

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.