Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Why makes the edge of a print more prone to have lines?

   
Author Topic: Why makes the edge of a print more prone to have lines?
Alan Gouger
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 501
From: Bradenton, FL, USA
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 06-06-2007 09:39 AM      Profile for Alan Gouger   Author's Homepage   Email Alan Gouger   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I am mostly talking used prints but what is it that almost all scope prints have lines on the extreme edges. The print can be like new in every other sense.
I do not see any projector or transport design reason for these lines. I do not see how miss handling can predictably cause lines on the edges. Whats causing them ?

 |  IP: Logged

Jeremy Weigel
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1062
From: Edmond, OK, USA
Registered: Mar 2007


 - posted 06-06-2007 10:11 AM      Profile for Jeremy Weigel   Email Jeremy Weigel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
With "used" prints it would be most likely due to someone breaking down the film at too high of speed. The film guides can't spin fast enough past a certain amount of speed since they rely on friction from the film. Once the film is coming off the platter at a faster rate than the friction can keep a "grip" on the film the film begins to glide over the guide surface.

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 06-06-2007 11:00 AM      Profile for Mike Blakesley   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Blakesley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I think the cause is more likely platter rollers (or other rollers) not turning properly.

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 06-06-2007 11:48 AM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
It's usually pad rollers not adjusted properly or failsafes (the older 80s type).

 |  IP: Logged

Monte L Fullmer
Film God

Posts: 8367
From: Nampa, Idaho, USA
Registered: Nov 2004


 - posted 06-06-2007 02:44 PM      Profile for Monte L Fullmer   Email Monte L Fullmer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
...and shouldered rollers...

 -

-Monte

 |  IP: Logged

Frank Dubrois
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 896
From: Cleveland, OH
Registered: Mar 2005


 - posted 06-06-2007 04:12 PM      Profile for Frank Dubrois     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
...another vote for pad rollers.

 |  IP: Logged

Ken Lackner
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1907
From: Atlanta, GA, USA
Registered: Sep 2001


 - posted 06-07-2007 06:38 AM      Profile for Ken Lackner   Email Ken Lackner   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Well, since Monte posted a picture of it, I'll ask. What is the point of those rollers? I never understood. Most of the Christie machines I used to service had those as their pad rollers.

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 06-07-2007 10:39 PM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
So did older Simplex/Century projectors too Ken.

 |  IP: Logged

Alan Gouger
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 501
From: Bradenton, FL, USA
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 06-07-2007 11:39 PM      Profile for Alan Gouger   Author's Homepage   Email Alan Gouger   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Thanks for all the replies. The picture of those rollers looks like the same as what my projector uses. Im not doing anything high speed through it though but I can see where if those were used on a transport at high speed it could be an issue.

 |  IP: Logged

Monte L Fullmer
Film God

Posts: 8367
From: Nampa, Idaho, USA
Registered: Nov 2004


 - posted 06-08-2007 02:12 AM      Profile for Monte L Fullmer   Email Monte L Fullmer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I need to add this comment on my pict: this pad roller came from the middle pad roller assembly which this roller is mounted on the front of the pad roller arm and this roller is holding the film as it leaves the intermittent sprocket to the middle constant speed sprocket.

If the lower loops are built too small, the inside of the lower loop is what is making contact with the inner shoulders of this particular roller and doing the base side scratching.

Chek with your local supplier for non-shouldered rollers to replace these shouldered rollers for your make of machine.

-Monte

 |  IP: Logged

Peter Mork
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 181
From: Newton, MA, USA
Registered: Jun 2002


 - posted 06-08-2007 03:02 AM      Profile for Peter Mork   Email Peter Mork   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I agree. I've long since replaced all those double-flanged rollers (or whittled off the inside flanges) wherever I found them, and never had a problem as far as them keeping film in place.

Maybe the idea was to give an extra bit of insurance when running beat-up prints with nicks and split-off edges - something you don't see much in the polyester era.

 |  IP: Logged

Monte L Fullmer
Film God

Posts: 8367
From: Nampa, Idaho, USA
Registered: Nov 2004


 - posted 06-09-2007 11:56 PM      Profile for Monte L Fullmer   Email Monte L Fullmer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I do believe that the shouldered roller concept came from the nitrate era - to keep the film securely centered on the sprocket since the constant speed sprockets on those early machines travelled a lot faster in rotation speed (16tooth) and a tighter film wrap making it prone for film hop off the sprocket.

The 24tooth XL sprocket was a blessing in the long run by slowing down the rotation speed and making a larger film wrap around the sprocket, thus less curve stress on the film.

Also, those early machines had brass pad rollers equipped with the same inner shoulders.

 |  IP: Logged

Louis Bornwasser
Film God

Posts: 4441
From: prospect ky usa
Registered: Mar 2005


 - posted 06-10-2007 08:48 AM      Profile for Louis Bornwasser   Author's Homepage   Email Louis Bornwasser   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Monte; remember the tps (teeth per second) is the same! Louis

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)  
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.