Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Todd A O Cine Apergon lens

   
Author Topic: Todd A O Cine Apergon lens
Robert Throop
Master Film Handler

Posts: 412
From: Vernon, NY USA
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 10-26-2007 11:54 AM      Profile for Robert Throop   Email Robert Throop   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I just bought one of these off ebay. There's no focal length marked on it. There's apparently a magnifier on the front. Does anyone know what the magnification is? The lens supposedly came from a theatre in SLC. I'll be at a theatre tomorrow where I can check the EF with some RP40.
Thanks,
Bob

 |  IP: Logged

Louis Bornwasser
Film God

Posts: 4441
From: prospect ky usa
Registered: Mar 2005


 - posted 10-26-2007 12:45 PM      Profile for Louis Bornwasser   Author's Homepage   Email Louis Bornwasser   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The "magnifier" looking glass is a deep curved focus corrector (I think.) I have replaced many of these lenses. Typically they have yellowed and have focus problems at the edges. The Uptown in D.C. had these until they were replaced with Isco lenses back in the 80's, Sub titles were much improved as well as color and overall brightness.

In other places, I forced a Magnecom 65 fully closed to get the same effect. Louis

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 10-26-2007 03:02 PM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Bob,

It would most likely be from the Villa Theater and... yep... those lenses did mysteriously dissappear one day...... so conceivably it could be a hot item???? BTW: The magnifier is normally adjustable by screwing it back and forth in its part of the barrel.

Mark

 |  IP: Logged

Thomas Pitt
Master Film Handler

Posts: 266
From: Leeds, West Yorkshire, UK
Registered: May 2007


 - posted 10-26-2007 03:25 PM      Profile for Thomas Pitt   Email Thomas Pitt   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Deep curved focus corrector? Is that a lens attachment that can compensate for curved screens, giving even focus throughout?

When I asked about why a movie I saw was out of focus, one of the projectionists at Leeds Light told me that they couldn't focus evenly on their two largest screens - due to the screen being slightly curved.

Perhaps they should invest in a couple of these corrective lenses [Big Grin]

 |  IP: Logged

Robert Throop
Master Film Handler

Posts: 412
From: Vernon, NY USA
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 10-28-2007 01:08 PM      Profile for Robert Throop   Email Robert Throop   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
By my calculations the lens is about 135mm without the magnifier and 126mm with. About a 7% difference. Screwing the magnifier in and out has no effect on magnification.
Bob

 |  IP: Logged

Chris Slycord
Film God

Posts: 2986
From: 퍼항시, 경상푹도, South Korea
Registered: Mar 2007


 - posted 10-29-2007 02:19 AM      Profile for Chris Slycord   Email Chris Slycord   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Thomas Pitt
Deep curved focus corrector? Is that a lens attachment that can compensate for curved screens, giving even focus throughout?
If it were, it would be called a "curved screen corrector."

quote: Thomas Pitt
When I asked about why a movie I saw was out of focus, one of the projectionists at Leeds Light told me that they couldn't focus evenly on their two largest screens - due to the screen being slightly curved.
A curved screen is always going to defocus the edges a little but they get rid of pincushioning (screen distortion in which the sides bow in).

 |  IP: Logged

Thomas Hauerslev
Master Film Handler

Posts: 451
From: Copenhagen, Denmark
Registered: Aug 2000


 - posted 10-29-2007 06:11 AM      Profile for Thomas Hauerslev   Author's Homepage   Email Thomas Hauerslev   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The Todd-AO projection lenses, known as Cine-Aperagons, were specially designed for each cinema with aspherical surfaces on some of their elements. Available focal lengths

2,6" = 66mm
3" = 76mm
3,5" = 89mm
4,1" = 104mm
5,6" = 142mm
6,6" = 168mm

 |  IP: Logged

Larry Myers
Master Film Handler

Posts: 371
From: Herndon, VA, USA
Registered: Jan 2001


 - posted 10-29-2007 10:52 AM      Profile for Larry Myers         Edit/Delete Post 
Actually, any normal lens wants to follow a curve. If you take a long string and tie one end at the projector lens and place the other end at the center and both ends of the screen, you will have a natural curve. The longer the string, the less curve the screen needs to be. The lens has to be corrected if the screen is flat or if the screen has a greater curve then what is traced out with the string. A flat field lens would be for a flat screen. Then a drive in movie screen 400 ft from the booth needs no correction since the curve would be to shallow to notice.

 |  IP: Logged

Dave Macaulay
Film God

Posts: 2321
From: Toronto, Canada
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 10-29-2007 01:09 PM      Profile for Dave Macaulay   Email Dave Macaulay   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
No.
A normal lens in a film projector with a flat film plane will focus exactly on a flat screen surface when the two planes (film and screen) are parallel. The rear and front focus distances are proportional: the centre of the film image is closer to the lens than the edges in exactly the same proportion as the centre of the screen is closer than the screen edges.
With a typical projection setup where the film and screen planes are not parallel plus either or both are curved... and with a short throw and very wide image... it's amazing how good the picture looks.

 |  IP: Logged

Larry Myers
Master Film Handler

Posts: 371
From: Herndon, VA, USA
Registered: Jan 2001


 - posted 10-29-2007 02:30 PM      Profile for Larry Myers         Edit/Delete Post 
That is true IF the lens is designed to do so. The issue is, what is the lens designed to do? Everything left alone, a simple lens wants to focus on a curved field with the film curved. Now enter new design elements and that condition changes that to what ever the lens designer wants the lens to do. That is, focus on a flat screen with the film being flat. Focus on a curved screen with the film being flat. Focus on a curved screen with the film being curved.

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 10-30-2007 06:50 AM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Its even more complicated than that...the film in the projector is not flat...not even with a straight gate...it will swell to the light source based on the heat of that light source. Furthermore...it pulsates with the shutter blade. It has also been proven with high-speed photography that "We" focus on the film when it is in its most deflected state.

Now take into acount the screen...how far is it away from the projector? What format is that lens being used for? This will trip up a "flat field" lens designer. You have the film with unknown deflection (based on wattage) in a projection system of unknown distance. That makes for a very tricky lens design and one that has keep constant lens design improvements coming from various lens manufacturers.

A flat screen will amost always exhibit a slight pincushion to the image which suggests that something is amiss in the flat-field design. A curved screen will virtually always exhibit a barrel distortion...depending on degree of curvature and the proximity of the projection system to the screen (including projector angle and skew). Some lenses definately focus better on curved screens (current designs). There is one absolute out there...there are no absolutes.

 |  IP: Logged

Dave Macaulay
Film God

Posts: 2321
From: Toronto, Canada
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 10-30-2007 07:42 PM      Profile for Dave Macaulay   Email Dave Macaulay   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
OK, the issue is very complex.
I wanted to point out that what Larry implied about a "normal" lens focusing from a plane image onto a cylinder/sphere centred on the lens is incorrect. It's possible to make such a lens but in film projection we generally deal with "normal" lenses that work like a super efficient pinhole.
Lens design is very complicated and any practical design will be a trade off between several objectives. This makes comparing lenses "by the numbers" impossible. A lens with amazingly sharp resolution measured with a high contrast USAF test pattern may have poor depth of field and poor performance with lower contrast images. A lens designed with a deep focus to allow for screen and film curvature plus geometric misalignment will have poorer peak resolution, but often looks much nicer in real world use.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)  
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.