my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Dolby CP200 - Museum Item?

Author Topic: Dolby CP200 - Museum Item? Ben Wales Jedi Master Film Handler Posts: 602 From: Southampton. England Registered: Jul 99 posted 01-01-2008 04:31 PM                     I have heard over the last few months several CP200's have be taken out of service both in Cinemas & Preview and replaced with CP650's etc and upgraded for D-Cinema. It appears that Dolby no longer support with parts & service for any processors older than the CP45 and soon the CP65. Is it the same World wide or just in Europe?, shame the CP200 is been made reduntant, nothing can match it for flexibility and performance.  |  IP: Logged Sam D. Chavez Film God Posts: 2153 From: Martinez, CA USA Registered: Aug 2003 posted 01-01-2008 05:33 PM                       The CP200's are coming out in droves. I believe there were something like 1200 to 1500 made lifetime so there are plenty of parts around to keep a few running. The Cat. No. 141's and the diode matrix cards are the hardest to replace and the 24 way edge connectors used here and there are pretty rare. The later version Cat. 108 cards are all gone as well. The 4 projector inputs offered with the optional aux rack are unique even today.  |  IP: Logged Louis Bornwasser Film God Posts: 4441 From: prospect ky usa Registered: Mar 2005 posted 01-01-2008 09:36 PM                        I agree that the 200 is flexible; however since it uses the same cards, it is no more "excellent" than a cp-50 unless much is spent on upgrades. I was once "caught" with 2 cp-200s in big houses and 10 cp-55s in smaller houses: "Why was the sound not as good in the premiere houses?" This was the prime cause of the 108-c card which helped a lot. Louis  |  IP: Logged Steve Guttag We forgot the crackers Gromit!!! Posts: 12814 From: Annapolis, MD Registered: Dec 1999 posted 01-02-2008 01:42 AM                     I keep saying "this is the last CP200 I'm going to put in" and somehow end up putting another one in. With the CP200, there are those venues that will benefit from such a processor as it is uniquely qualified for some applications. For instance, if you are going to run 70mm magnetic...it really handles it best. If you are going beyond 2 projectors, it is the easiest though there was a 4-projector mod for the CP65...which is also discontinued. If you will have 5-screen channels, the CP200 again will be a good choice. None of my CP200 theatres are what I would term as "basic." Generally there are tons of formats programmed into the CP200 and they all have 70mm machines connected to them. There are things to keep in mind with this processor...it is OLD...it went out of production in 1993 or 1994 (the last new one we took deliverly on was in 1993...by then the "hockey-stick" switches had be changed to tumbwheel style). All of the capacitors in even the most recent unit are now going to be over 15-years old. If you have one of the first batches in 1980, then it is over a 1/4-century old! You have electromechanical things (relays, rotary switches) that can fail or go noisey on you in addition to watching out for aging electrolytics. That said, if one is careful it can be a very viable processor today if one keeps it current. The Cat 108C, 150E/F, Cat 560, Cat 517s are all a must in my book. Cat 64Bs are also up there though if using non-suffixed Cat 64s, change the input/output pots or repace them with a wire and fixed resistor...somewhere I have what value (it isn't the same as what is used in a 64B as the circuit is a little different). On the PS1(b), nix the "stone henge" bridge rectifier for the +/- 14V rail and replace it with a square one (6A or better)...Dolby did this on latter units too. All of the main capacitors in the the PS1 should be changed. Use suitably sized replacements and SOLDER THEM IN (use PCB mount caps)...I can't tell you how many PS1s I've had with loose capacitor screws! Alternatively, you could always use off-the-shelf power supplies of suitable current ratings. The connector for the power is by AMP and is part of their "MR" series. The advantage here being that the PS1 is not regulated...a modern supply can be...this will keep the +/- 15V rail from sagging which should improve its noise specs. The other thing to watch out for on a CP200 (and older units) is it is totally unbalanced...any poor planning and you will get hums in the system. As for DCinema and the CP200...no big thing...obtain a Dolby DMA8 Plus or Ultra's ECI and you are done. And Unlike the CP650's method of dealing with DCinema, the stand alone adapters will allow multiple sources of digital audio and in the case of the DMA8 (plus) Dolby-E. The CP200 remains the most flexible and well thought out processor I've ever seen for this industry. Audio wise, it is no slouch either. However, it brings with it enough overhead now that you should have a specific need for its features before consider installing one. If you have one, if it has been kept up, odds are, it will cost notably more to replace it than to merely obtain the necessary outboard device to adapt it to a new format. Steve  |  IP: Logged Sam D. Chavez Film God Posts: 2153 From: Martinez, CA USA Registered: Aug 2003 posted 01-02-2008 10:29 AM                       Steve. Well Put!  |  IP: Logged Bill Ryan Film Handler Posts: 22 From: Gloucester. N.S.W. Australia Registered: Nov 2004 posted 01-05-2008 07:32 PM                     Absolutely Steve I love my 200,s  |  IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

Printer-friendly view of this topic

Hop To: Select a Forum: Category: Operations -------------------- Digital Cinema Forum Film Handlers' Forum Large Format Forum Ground Level Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets Category: Community -------------------- Film-Yak Film Handlers' Movie Reviews The Afterlife Bob Maar's Joke-A-Thon Category: Classified -------------------- Equipment and Supplies Wanted/For Sale Help Wanted/Seeking Employment Category: System -------------------- Software Beta Testing Forum

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.