Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Light meters for screen levels

   
Author Topic: Light meters for screen levels
Phil Ranucci
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 236
From: Carpinteria,CA, United States
Registered: May 2006


 - posted 01-09-2008 11:42 PM      Profile for Phil Ranucci   Email Phil Ranucci   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I have been looking for a meter to check screen levels. The Spectra is now $2500, and I've looked at the Sekonic L-758 Cine which reads in Foot-Lamberts. Sekonic doesn't know if the meter can take into account the shutter of a 35mm projector.
I recall others asking this question, but no answers from people that have actually used the Sekonic, or any other meter for that matter.
The Spectra is stupidly expensive and there has to be another way, preferably without having to do any sort of conversions/calculations.
Anybody got an answer?
Thanks,
Phil

 |  IP: Logged

Marco Giustini
Film God

Posts: 2713
From: Reading, UK
Registered: Nov 2007


 - posted 01-10-2008 06:01 AM      Profile for Marco Giustini   Email Marco Giustini   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Hi Phil

Took a Sekonic last month, I had to return it because the fps setting you can see on the specifications are referred to CAMERA shutter and not projector shutter. Sekonic is not able to compensate for shutter compensation.

Actually, I read a note on an old Pytlak's article saying that a Sekonic 558 can be used to mesure screen luminance, but with calibration.

I asked on this forum when I was using the Sekonic, before selling it back, but no replies.

Sekonic post

I was forced to buy a Screenchecker, not as precise as Sekonic, but at least I have a reading.

The only way to have a reading was to use the flash measurement. The Sekonic read the projector light as sequential flashes.
But the unit of measure was not useful.

Let me know!

Marco

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 01-10-2008 07:16 AM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The problem arises that if one uses a poor quality meter that all they are provided with is a relative number for that meter rather than any sort of accurate measurement. This is equivalent to some saying..."hmmm that looks like 14fL" and carries with it no more weight.

Now, if you do have access to a calibrated meter (just for a loan) and you have a lesser meter, you can reference the lesser meter against the good one and see if it will provide reliable readings of an accuracy needed for the application. Be sure to check the lesser meter over a significant range of values likely to be encountered...say 6fL up to 30fL.

Light meters may seem stupidly expensive but in truth, they are not. There is no economy of scale in that technology. Furthermore, their value is in the quality of readings they provide. Just how many meters do you think they sell each year? The number is likely in the 100s or even 10s. For that, they had to design the thing...go through revisions to get it working, and ensure its accuracy. Then they had to go to manufacturing on a small-volume device which means all of the metal fab or molded plastic...etc also enjoys no economy of scale...finally market and package the unit. I guarantee you that NOBODY is getting rich on light meters (for cinemas at least).

Now I do agree it is expensive. In fact, it is probably the worst bang for the buck equipment in a tech's tool kit. You typically point-shoot take a reading...maybe make an adjustment and 1-2 minutes later you are done. How many billable minutes does a business have to generate before their light meter has "paid for itself?" The answer is forever...because for them to be worth using, their accuracy has to be checked annually.

Now the Ultra Stereo PSA is a bit better in many regards since it is a very useful alignment tool in addition to being 45 light meters in one box. It is more expensive than the Spectra but it is also MUCH more useful. You can get absolutely EVEN and properly lit images with it. As someone that sets up a lot of multi-projector systems, I find it to be THE best way...it sits down in the auditorium while I can adjust the systems in the booth. When done, the difference between projectors is minimized.

Now if you want to complain about the cost of meters...start pricing out chromaticity meters. They are essential for setting up DCinema and really useful for film too (particularly for multi-projectors for color balance). The average price on them is well over $10K. I'm happy to say, that USL's PSC has done well for us (even before DCinema use) but has actually done well in setting up DCinema projectors (and I've A/Bed it to much more expensive units). In one instance, I found it to be more accurate...but that was likely that ours had been freshly calibrated and the other unit had not.

Steve

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 01-10-2008 07:29 AM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I agree on the USL meters... They are dead accurate and easy to operate. It goes to show that the more expensive meters are not necessarily any more accurate... they more expensive meters may be more flexible though. For a screen brightness meter I wouldn't go anywhere except USL... We happen to own PSA Serial number #1. I haven't had a chance to compare it's readings with te PCA meters Footlambert section but I will later today.

Mark

 |  IP: Logged

Louis Bornwasser
Film God

Posts: 4441
From: prospect ky usa
Registered: Mar 2005


 - posted 01-10-2008 09:56 AM      Profile for Louis Bornwasser   Author's Homepage   Email Louis Bornwasser   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
"You get what you pay for." Louis (Spectra dealer)

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 01-10-2008 08:24 PM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Mark, if they were calibrated within a year of each other, you should find that they agree VERY closely...ours sure do. We tend to get our meters (and THX mics) calibrated once-per-year to ensure accuracy. We also have a Photo-Reasearch Cine-Spot meter I like for point-n-shoot work...It too agrees with the USL stuff...it is very handy for checking screen gain too (and also is accurate enough to do contrast readings).

I wish the PSA went down to 1/100th of a fL as that is essential for any meaningful contrast measurements. The PCA will do it (it reads down to .001 but I think its accuracy is not down to .001, if I recall correctly.

Steve

 |  IP: Logged

Marco Giustini
Film God

Posts: 2713
From: Reading, UK
Registered: Nov 2007


 - posted 01-10-2008 10:20 PM      Profile for Marco Giustini   Email Marco Giustini   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I'm sure that USL is a very good piece of equipment, the colorimeter is a must in D-Cinema.
Actually I'm just starting the job and I do not have many customers. I know that I cannot have more customers if I do not have the right equipment, but for my needs a Sekonic was enough. I realize that the Screenchecker is very roughtly but I cannot afford a Spectra or an USL at the moment...

Ciao
Marco

 |  IP: Logged

Phil Hill
I love my cootie bug

Posts: 7595
From: Hollywood, CA USA
Registered: Mar 2000


 - posted 01-10-2008 10:23 PM      Profile for Phil Hill   Email Phil Hill       Edit/Delete Post 
What about the Minolta spot meter...any good?

It has a 1 degree spot and a cine range of 8 to 128 fps.

I've used mine for many years to measure screen brightness and falloff at the edges.

 -

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 01-10-2008 11:13 PM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I will know tommrrow if they match or not...didn't get to it today. Both were calibrated with in the last month fortunately...

I would never consider a Spectra Meter... they let them go obsolete way too fast...been there done that, another dislike Ihave of them is that they are no more than adaptionsof existing "Off The Street Meters" for me its USL first and then Minolta. The Photo Research meters that Dolby had when I attended their class (Louis was there too) were not even close to each other... all three they had read very differently.

Of all the meters out there I prefer the Minolta CS 200 for measuring color space... its also the more flexible of the bunch and the most rock solid of all the color meters out there... priced about the same as the Photo Research. The thing is that the USL is every bit as accurate and built in a solid block of alumnium so why spend all the extra money.

Mark

 |  IP: Logged

Louis Bornwasser
Film God

Posts: 4441
From: prospect ky usa
Registered: Mar 2005


 - posted 01-11-2008 09:33 AM      Profile for Louis Bornwasser   Author's Homepage   Email Louis Bornwasser   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
In fairness, the Spectra does use the CASE of an off the shelf meter; insides (including electronics and optics) are quite different. 1 degree optics are unknown outside of our specialty. Louis

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)  
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.