my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Bausch Lomb and Isco 35mm anamorphic scope projector lens (Page 1)

This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2

Author Topic: Bausch Lomb and Isco 35mm anamorphic scope projector lens Steve Beverly Film Handler Posts: 83 From: El Paso, Tx., Registered: Nov 2007 posted 02-06-2008 01:10 AM                     What is you opinion of the Bausch Lomb anamorphic scope projector lens for 35mm projectors in general? How 'bout the Isco s? Are they good enough for film grading? Thanks-Steve  |  IP: Logged Louis Bornwasser Film God Posts: 4441 From: prospect ky usa Registered: Mar 2005 posted 02-06-2008 06:09 AM                        Anything B&L, by now, has degraded until it is either brown or green. While "cutting edge" at the time, that was 50+ years ago. Stay with an ISCO or Schneider lens which is more typical of what you will find in first run cinemas. Modern design and no pine sap. Louis  |  IP: Logged Scott Norwood Film God Posts: 8146 From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas) Registered: Jun 99 posted 02-06-2008 06:54 AM                        While ISCO and Schneider "should" be better than B&L, I would definitely test several examples of each. You might get lucky. Some of the old lenses are actually very good, although they seem to be outnumbered (now) by bad examples and ones with deteriorated glue. I know that everyone here hates Super Snaplites (me, included, as a general rule), but I have one pair that is excellent. edit: grammar [ 02-06-2008, 07:57 AM: Message edited by: Scott Norwood ]  |  IP: Logged Richard May Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1057 From: Floral Park, NY USA Registered: Aug 2004 posted 02-06-2008 07:56 AM                     I know they are old but there are still plenty of B&L attachment in use that look fine.  |  IP: Logged Mark Gulbrandsen Resident Trollmaster Posts: 16657 From: Music City Registered: Jun 99 posted 02-06-2008 08:00 AM                     I agree... I know of at least several that are sharp as a a tack!! The contrast is not as nice as an ISCO but there are a few of these old lenses that are still amazing... If you can hand select a nice one form batch of a hundred you'd probably do ok but otherwise stick with a new ISCO... preferably da blew ones.... . Mark Mark  |  IP: Logged Frank Angel Film God Posts: 5305 From: Brooklyn NY USA Registered: Dec 1999 posted 02-06-2008 11:15 AM                        We have been using two of those mutha B&H anamorphics -- the big ones that I was told at the time we bought them that they were desigined for CinemaScope 55. I later found that was probably seller's hype, although they could have been used for that purpose if there were actually any theatres that ever played a CinemaScope 55 print. The lens elements are flawless and there is no browning of the glue like I've seen in lots of the old lenses. It seems we got a good pair. Because of the very large elements of these B&Hs, the 35mm image sits in the center of a very large opening (if you are using the larger diameter prime lens) and I must say, the screen image is very sharp indeed -- when you focus, you can easily "feel" the "in focus" point -- no racking back and forth like I've had to do with some other anamorphics -- the focus just jumps out at you. Blacks are still very good so contrast isn't terribly degraded. As with most things technical, with a good eye you probably would be able to see a difference with a newer lens if you could do an A/B test, but your audience isn't doing A/B tests and standing alone these particular B&Hs hold their own on the screen and need no apology. With a little luck and lots of B&Hs to look thru, you might find one that will look just fine on your screen until you can get a deal on an ISCO.  |  IP: Logged Mark Gulbrandsen Resident Trollmaster Posts: 16657 From: Music City Registered: Jun 99 posted 02-06-2008 08:12 PM                     Don't laugh but the sharpest anamorphic I've ever personally seen and run RP-40 thorugh is a Panavision Prismatic Ultra Panatar adaptor. Amazing sharpness but you loose about 40% of the light going through! Mark  |  IP: Logged Tim Reed Better Projection Pays Posts: 5246 From: Northampton, PA Registered: Sep 1999 posted 02-07-2008 01:26 AM                       quote: Frank Angel We have been using two of those mutha B&H anamorphics -- the big ones that I was told at the time we bought them that they were desigined for CinemaScope 55. Frank, those are probably the 4" dia. attachments made for drive-ins - they're so large they require additional mechanical support. The wider opening allowed for faster backup lenses, in the ridiculously long focal lengths many drive-ins required. It's a ton of glass.  |  IP: Logged Louis Bornwasser Film God Posts: 4441 From: prospect ky usa Registered: Mar 2005 posted 02-07-2008 03:15 AM                        Tons of glass; mostly just for show; only the center par in use. Louis  |  IP: Logged Frank Angel Film God Posts: 5305 From: Brooklyn NY USA Registered: Dec 1999 posted 02-08-2008 03:39 AM                        Our XL has an attachement that screws in above the lens -- a rod sticks out and an adaptor ring which attaches to the front of the anamorphic rides on the rod to hold it up. Unfortunately we were only able to find one of these adaptors. The other projector has a high tech solution to the missing rod adapter -- a bungy cord is attached to the upper magazine and to the adaptor ring to take the weight of the front of the lens. I've got two of the Panavision Panatar (adjustable) prism anamorphics but have never tried them out. I don't have the adaptors to hold them to the front of the projector. And you need that adaptor cause they are humungous. But I really should give them a try -- the manual claims they don't loose ANY light....my face laughs.  |  IP: Logged Gilles Elbhar Film Handler Posts: 21 From: pavillons sous bois / France Registered: Mar 2006 posted 02-08-2008 04:30 AM                        Isco is better than Schneider. With Schneider the lentil, inside lens, are moving. With no reason, picture become blur on screen...  |  IP: Logged Claude S. Ayakawa Film God Posts: 2738 From: Waipahu, Hawaii, USA Registered: Aug 2002 posted 02-08-2008 10:23 AM                        Regarding CinemaScope 55, 20th Century Fox made only two films using this process in the fifties. It was CAROUSEL and THE KING & I and neither of them were publicly shown in that large format. CAROUSEL was only shown in 35mm as well as THE KING & I but the Yul Brynner film was later shown in 70mm at the Hollywood Bowl and a few other venues -Claude  |  IP: Logged Aaron Sisemore Flaming Ribs beat Reeses Peanut Butter Cups any day! Posts: 3061 From: Rockwall TX USA Registered: Sep 1999 posted 02-08-2008 03:02 PM                     quote: Don't laugh but the sharpest anamorphic I've ever personally seen and run RP-40 thorugh is a Panavision Prismatic Ultra Panatar adaptor. Amazing sharpness but you loose about 40% of the light going through! The best anamorphics I have seen to this day are the old pink HiLux prismatics. Tack-sharp picture, very little color fringing (no more than most large Iscos), and no 'basketballing' of the image (lines remain straight across the screen from top to bottom). Only cons are the light loss issue and that they won't work for short (under 50') throws. -Aaron  |  IP: Logged Mark Gulbrandsen Resident Trollmaster Posts: 16657 From: Music City Registered: Jun 99 posted 02-08-2008 03:25 PM                     You're right Aaron, They lack much of the chromatic abberation(color fringing) that you see in todays typical Schneider and ISCO anamorphic glass. As thick as those prisms are you'd think there'd be alot of that and alot of refraction... somehow they did it right though. There are today several anamorphic attachments available for home video projectors that use the large prisms. The Delrama lenses used for Technirama were also almost completely void of any chromatic abberation... one of the main reasons that I think Technirama looked so good. Mark  |  IP: Logged Dick Prather Master Film Handler Posts: 259 From: Portland, OR, USA Registered: Feb 2002 posted 02-08-2008 04:04 PM                     One of the best scope pictures I ever saw also came from a pair of Ultra Panatar C/S adaptors. Frank, I wouldn't waste your time testing Super Panatar lenses. Try a set of Ultra's if you can find a set. Ultra's screwed to the back-up and do not need an projector adapter. May need a thread adaptor depending what back-up lens you have. They are not as heavy as your B&L drive-in lenses. As any non-adjustable C/S lens you MUST have the correct front glass to match your throw distance or the lense will not focus properly. Usually this was stamped on the glass such as "60-80" or so. After a couple of hundred feet they were not necessory other then keeping dust out. The new lenses are indeed better but some of the old standbys do a fine job. Dick  |  IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2

Printer-friendly view of this topic

Hop To: Select a Forum: Category: Operations -------------------- Digital Cinema Forum Film Handlers' Forum Large Format Forum Ground Level Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets Category: Community -------------------- Film-Yak Film Handlers' Movie Reviews The Afterlife Bob Maar's Joke-A-Thon Category: Classified -------------------- Equipment and Supplies Wanted/For Sale Help Wanted/Seeking Employment Category: System -------------------- Software Beta Testing Forum

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.