my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Big 35mm screens (Page 1)

This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2

Author Topic: Big 35mm screens Tim Asten Film Handler Posts: 98 From: Brighton, United Kingdom Registered: Nov 2006 posted 03-10-2008 07:44 PM                     I have just read about a 100 ft screen for 35mm in a Hoyts cinema in Oz. They use a Kinoton "E" series projector with an 8k lamp. Is it really possible to get a decent 35mm picture on a screen that big? I know it depends partly on the quality of the prints and lamp house set up and so on, but there must be a limit to how much light you can punch through a 35 frame without heat damage etc? We have a 60ft screen in our largest room and our Kinoton FP40 with a 7k lamp and schneider lenses provides a picture which is at best on the dim side and quite soft. I have yet to see a 35mm screen larger than ours but these even bigger screens seem to be on the increase. Are customers being ripped off thinking they are going to get a fantastic movie experience or has technology moved on in the last 6 or 7 years? Tim.  |  IP: Logged Steve Guttag We forgot the crackers Gromit!!! Posts: 12814 From: Annapolis, MD Registered: Dec 1999 posted 03-10-2008 09:46 PM                     Odds are, the 7K lamp is LIMITING your light output. There is a correlation between the size of the source of the light and the smallest aperture you can fit it through. For more on the subject, look up Etandue. Kinoton has the best optics with the lowest heat, I have found. Furthermore, one has to match the lamp with the optics of the system! Yes, the same lamp in a different lamphouse using possibly different lenses will yield different results. I've found some 5K lamps that work well with say a Strong 15" reflector but put out LESS light than a 4K lamp in say a Kinoton lamphouse! In general, you will have more light throughput with a 6K lamp in a 35mm installation than a 7KW lamp. Not only will more light actually get through the aperture, less heat will be generated too. There are some new lamps out and coming out that are based on super-short arc gaps...these lamps can be substantially brighter. For instance, I did some extensive testing on the ASL XM4202 lamp...you can expect it to bey close to 30% brighter than most ANY standard 4KHS type lamp in the same lamphouse (Kinoton). 30% is HUGE and the heat penalty for a 4200-watt over a 4KW is minimal and more than offset by the extra light. I'm currently testing another high-brightness lamp (4500-watt) that is on the order of 40% brighter! In fact, this new 4500-watt lamp is putting out more light being run with only 3000-watts of power than a 5KW lamp running at just OVER 5KW (same manufacturer on the lamp). The temperture differnce at the aperture and in the lamphouse is substantial. Furthermore, it is only drawing 3/5ths the power...with electric prices nowadays, that can't be ignored. So can you light up a 100-foot screen for 35mm? Depends on the screen (curved/flat and gain or not)...the lens and the optical system employed. I've tested lenses (same machine, same screen and refocused the lamp for best light on both using a PSA200 meter). I had one have the same light at f/2.1 as the other had at f/1.7. The f/2.1 lens had more resolution...when the f/1.7 lens was raised to f/2.1...the resolution evened out but the light was about 20% less. Note, this was only tested on one focal length...it may not hold true for other focal lengths. I think, with a Kinoton Premier projector (notably better than a 50% shutter), ISCO Ultra Star PLUS lenses, 6K High Brightness lamp, and a screen with a gain at 1.8 or greater (and curved properly), yes, you could hit upwards of 13.5 to 16fL on a 41.8' x 100' screen. Now with that said...the throw would dictate what prime lens you would need and that may ruin it as you get to extreme focal lengths, compromises are often made to get the focal length. Clearly this is a venue that screams for 70mm! Steve  |  IP: Logged Rick Hunter Master Film Handler Posts: 452 From: Melbourne, Australia Registered: Feb 2003 posted 03-11-2008 03:36 AM                     I refer you to this topic... Topic: Largest Permanent Screen Ever Installed in a Everyday Working Theatre ...in this forum.  |  IP: Logged Stu Jamieson Jedi Master Film Handler Posts: 524 From: Buccan, Qld, Australia Registered: Jan 2008 posted 03-11-2008 04:07 AM                     quote: Tim Asten I have just read about a 100 ft screen for 35mm in a Hoyts cinema in Oz. They use a Kinoton "E" series projector with an 8k lamp. Is it really possible to get a decent 35mm picture on a screen that big? No.  |  IP: Logged Tim Asten Film Handler Posts: 98 From: Brighton, United Kingdom Registered: Nov 2006 posted 03-11-2008 11:30 AM                     It seems some of us have polarized opinions on giant screens. However, many thanks Steve for the useful information on the newer types of lamps and the fact that a bigger lamp does not automatically mean more light. I have heard of rooms with bigger screens than ours that use smaller lamps with apparent success. We may have to possibly adjust the lamphouse & ballast and experiment next time with say a 5 or 6k xenon and see what happens. Tim.  |  IP: Logged Phil Blake Jedi Master Film Handler Posts: 558 From: esperance western australia Registered: Nov 2003 posted 03-13-2008 12:46 AM                        The screen at my first drive in was 148' x 42' high , we had a throw over 400' and the picture was really quite good. It was lit initially with BTH carbon arcs which did struggle with light output and latter X60 strong xenons which produced excellent light on the large screen.  |  IP: Logged Jarrad Salmon Film Handler Posts: 25 From: Baulkham Hills, NSW, Australia Registered: May 2006 posted 03-17-2008 06:10 AM                     I'm a bit late to this topic, but been absent for a while! Hoyts at Blacktown is the cinema right? Haven't been there but have worked at the Greater Union Parramatta site with a 25 metre screen... They call it a G-Max cinema. The light output is the same as all of the smaller screens when tested/calibrated with the light meter. From memory it is only a 6K xennon, but don't quote me on that. Picture was up to the standard of 35mm presentations. EDIT: The projectors are the kinoton FP30 E's  |  IP: Logged Sean McKinnon Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1712 From: Peabody Massachusetts Registered: Sep 2000 posted 03-17-2008 09:40 AM                        Steve, I was told once that the reason you can't get as much light out of a 7+ K lamp is that the anode/cathode are too big causing you not to be able to focus the lamp down far enough to take advantage of the extra light? Is that BS or not?  |  IP: Logged Robert John Jeromson Master Film Handler Posts: 264 From: Auckland, New Zealand Registered: Jul 2004 posted 03-18-2008 01:39 AM                     According to Guinness the largest "fixed" 35mm projection screen in the world resides at Hoyts Sylvia park in Auckland, New Zealand at 30.63m wide x 12.29m tall.  |  IP: Logged Alan Gouger Jedi Master Film Handler Posts: 501 From: Bradenton, FL, USA Registered: Jul 2000 posted 03-18-2008 04:16 PM                        You guys are running some big a$$ screens in New Zealand:)  |  IP: Logged Louis Bornwasser Film God Posts: 4441 From: prospect ky usa Registered: Mar 2005 posted 03-19-2008 11:16 AM                        Sean; in the 70's Strong sent out a paper showing "usable lumens." Super Lumex 2500 watt was the same as the X60 at 3000 watts. X60/4000 being slightly more. X60/7000 showed no more usable lumems than the 4k. 7000 had a lot more, but only with 70mm film. The point was "no reason to go to 7 unless you are 70mm." Your resuls may vary depending upon bulb and reflector design. Louis  |  IP: Logged Jack Ondracek Film God Posts: 2348 From: Port Orchard, WA, USA Registered: Oct 2002 posted 03-19-2008 12:04 PM                        I don't have numbers for comparison, but I can say that we get much better performance from our Big Sky 7k lamps than I was getting from our X60/glass reflector @ 4k. The picture is noticeably brighter, detail is better, AND the lamphouse allowed us to focus out the edges better. We're running these behind XLs and Schneiders. From what I've heard around here, the Christie SLC should be able to produce the same results, though the only one I've seen in a drive-in is running old bulbs and is not maintained. OK, maybe I'm not getting 16fL, but in a pitch dark drive-in, my 86 footer looks pretty darned nice.  |  IP: Logged Louis Bornwasser Film God Posts: 4441 From: prospect ky usa Registered: Mar 2005 posted 03-19-2008 03:18 PM                        smpte std: drive in: 4-6 ft/lambert. Your expensive reflector was designed with 35mm in mind. I do believe it is of European origin. BTW: most large drive ins are X60/Century. Perhaps the X60 is not "best" except at 4kw. Louis  |  IP: Logged Jack Ondracek Film God Posts: 2348 From: Port Orchard, WA, USA Registered: Oct 2002 posted 03-19-2008 04:16 PM                        I've heard your observations about that reflector from several sources, Louis. It wouldn't surprise me. The light around the heat baffles does seem much more focused than with the X-60. I really did like the glass reflector on that lamp. I've also heard the comment about the XL... maybe from you. I've got a Century head out here that I'll probably be trying, once I find the time.  |  IP: Logged David Kilderry Master Film Handler Posts: 355 From: Melbourne Australia Registered: Sep 1999 posted 03-20-2008 04:40 AM                        Jack our three drive-in screens are similar in size to yours, we run Strong X60 C, X 60 D and a Super 80 (essentially all the same size lamphouse, just from different years). We run 5,000 watt lamps and get very good light for a drive-in, certainly better than the others in this state. I have seen the 30 meter screen at Hoyts Blacktown multiplex in Sydney; it is very dull, even for screens this size. The lamp installed is either very old or poorly aligned. The 30 meter screen just near here at Village Knox V-Max is better, but has slipped in brightness in recent years and is certainly duller than ours. I would have a spotmeter shootout with any of the local 25 meter plus width indoor screens v's our drive-in screens any night of the week, they simply do not maintain them to ensure the light is at the optimum level. The Strongs correctly aligned and maintained with a 5k lamp are an excellent lamphouse for drive-in use. Various technicians with national experience have said our drive-in screens are better lit than just about any they have seen. Fresh lamps are the key along with clean polished reflectors and someone who knows how to align a xenon lamphouse. The SMPTE spec (is it 192 M? - I forget) relating to drive-in light requirements being 4fl from any ramp position, would show up some indoor screens these days I think! David  |  IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2

Printer-friendly view of this topic

Hop To: Select a Forum: Category: Operations -------------------- Digital Cinema Forum Film Handlers' Forum Large Format Forum Ground Level Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets Category: Community -------------------- Film-Yak Film Handlers' Movie Reviews The Afterlife Bob Maar's Joke-A-Thon Category: Classified -------------------- Equipment and Supplies Wanted/For Sale Help Wanted/Seeking Employment Category: System -------------------- Software Beta Testing Forum

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.