|
|
Author
|
Topic: SDDS film prints in Europe
|
Allan Riddelll
Film Handler
Posts: 33
From: msida , malta, europe
Registered: Jan 2009
|
posted 01-21-2009 06:37 PM
Out here in Malta we have 6 DFP3000 processors in our 6 screens - 2 with SRD backup. The general scenario being that SDDS was chosen as, at the time (2000), it was considered the premiere digital format offering at best the 8 channel configuration when utilised. So far so good. SDDS at its best, in my opinion, is head and shoulders above SRD or DTS (and incidentally i am not an employee of any of them). So, as Shakespeare would say, here's the rub: Over the 8 years since our opening the standard of SDDS prints have deteriorated rapidly and by that i mean prints from both Technicolor and Deluxe London. Am not talking about used prints either. You can be sure that when u check the cans and u see SR/SRD/DTS/SDDS you can think again. What a major misnomer. Tracks labeled SDDS without SDDS - tracks not labeled SDDS but complete with SDDS and multiple dropouts. I have 8 years of film reports and a good percentage cite high dropout rates (pc based error rates confirm this). Here's my most recent one: Madagascar 2 - reel one SDDS - drop out just after start reel 2 and remainder. reel 3 goes into SDDS after a few minutes then couple of d/o for remainder. Reels 4 and 5 not SDDS. Then comes a brief respite when we occasionally receive used prints from the States (recent titles being Lakeview Terrace, The Express and, i think, Beverly Hills Chihuahua) - and guess what ? All SDDS tracks are immaculate and play like a dream. You can bet that any prints with a USA prefix will be trouble free. It should be mentioned that the Sony technicians who have been here to service our equipment have been more than efficient and helpful and indeed have been trying to address the problem. But quite simply put, if the labs across the pond can get it right, why do we have to put up with this crap. The final note being that yes, i,ll get comments about SDDS supposedly being on the way out but thats not on. Many thousands of exhibitors invested in this equipment and we here in Europe are being treated to a Russian Roulette state of affairs. Yes there is no domestic equivalent but , to be fair, SRD can be just as guilty. Cloverfield, incidentally, was a crud of a movie, but it has the best SDDS track i have ever heard.
Change of subject - 2 movies - Let the Good Times Roll (1974) and Snow Job (1971 and retitled Ski Raiders in UK) . Any of u guys have it on DVD ?
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Blaine Young
Master Film Handler
Posts: 477
From: Kirkland, WA, USA
Registered: Sep 2006
|
posted 01-22-2009 12:11 PM
quote: Louis Bornwasser SDDS, in the States, is just about as bad. Sony does not fully support the equipment and prints are becoming harder and harder to find. Some releases haveno sdds at all on any print.
Aside from Focus Features (which never have an SDDS track), an occasional Fox title (The Sentinel) and handfuls of independent pictures ("Bottle Shock" & "Nobel Son"), SDDS tracks are present on nearly every title. We don't have any readers - so that doesn't do us any good.
I also find it interesting that some prints overseas do not have SDDS tracks, where the US versions do. I've seen prints of "Independence Day", "Star Trek" VII-X, "Star Wars" Episode IV & V, and "Titanic" all which didn't have SDDS tracks. Granted - these are a few years old...
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|