|
|
Author
|
Topic: dolby CP65 question, new to this
|
Bradley Johnson
Film Handler
Posts: 23
From: Newport, WA, USA
Registered: Feb 2009
|
posted 02-26-2009 07:18 PM
Sorry guys,,,,,I am a newbie in this field so go easy on me.
I live in a very small town in Wa state and we are lucky enough to have a very old but great cinema here. It recently was sold by the original owners (it was built in 1952). The new owner came to me to help upgrade the sound system from the original mono amp and single speaker cabinet. I am a live audio engineer by trade and was the only one around with any audio related experience. The cinema is on a very slim budget and I have donated my time. I have completely installed a left center right setup with sub and surround speakers. At the moment we are still using the original setup,,,my question is based on the Dolby CP65. I bought one on line and noticed that it did not come with the cat 350 cards. Will it still function? Should I be looking for a pair of said cards and if so, is there a modification that needs to be done, or can I just put them in the slots? The unit is not marked as a 65A. One other question is on the projector end of things. The readers are Kelmars and have no other label or id that I can find. My question here is being that the original system was mono, will these need to be upgraded?
Thanks!
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tony Bandiera Jr
Film God
Posts: 3067
From: Moreland Idaho
Registered: Apr 2004
|
posted 02-27-2009 09:14 PM
As Marco has said, yes all current films have optical tracks..but two minor notes:
Not ALL films are done in Digital so the optical track MIGHT be only Dolby A (depends a lot on country of origin, some art/foreign films have Dolby A-type tracks) but he is right the vast majority, even without digital tracks will be optical SR.
As for the idea of the optical being a backup only and not subject to QC, I'd say that's not necessarily true in all cases, but it is derived from the digital masters and it is possible that it isn't qc'd as well as it should be, but so far, most prints I've run across with bad optical tracks have tended to have other problems with the picture portion and sometimes the digital tracks too.
To expand on Marco's first point, he means that the optical track will have three key differences, in order of most noticeable to least noticeable..: The surrounds will be only one channel, not separate left/right; the dynamic range will be lower; and there will still be noticeable bits of noise from dirt and splices.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|