my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Outstanding film quality at SxSW this year

Author Topic: Outstanding film quality at SxSW this year Jason Whyte Expert Film Handler Posts: 132 From: Victoria, BC, Canada Registered: Sep 2002 posted 03-26-2009 10:51 AM                        I know John Stewart who works at the Paramount is a member here so perhaps he knows the answer to this query, but this is also open to anyone who knows more about festival prints. I had a great time covering SxSW 2009 this year, and one thing in particular I noticed was that the 35mm prints of titles like "I Love You Man", "Observe and Report" and "500 Days of Summer" all looked stunning projected at the Paramount in Austin. Focus and framing were flawless, but I also noticed fully clean prints free of debris and -- most notably -- lab splices. Furthermore, none of these prints had traditional lab cues, rather hand-marked cues that looked either applied by one person at the studio or projection at the Paramount. This leads me to believe that these were specially made prints made just for this screening, and I could tell they were of a much higher quality than what I normally see at home (note: EVERY print has at least two or three lab splices). Maybe it's a silly question, but are dye-transfer prints still made? Or are these just really, really high quality "show prints" made for this festival? Jason [ 03-26-2009, 12:31 PM: Message edited by: Jason Whyte ]  |  IP: Logged Scott Norwood Film God Posts: 8146 From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas) Registered: Jun 99 posted 03-26-2009 11:32 AM                        You probably saw "answer prints." These are made from the original camera negative and do not have lab. splices or cues (they usually have handmade Clint Phare cues). They are much higher quality than standard release prints, which are three generations (camera neg->interpostive->internegative->release print) away from the camera negative, and which are printed and processed at high speed. Answer printing is part of the production process where final color timing and exposure decisions are made. Sometimes, the answer print is made before the sound is mixed, and the print has a blank track; in this case, the actual soundtrack may be run on a separate magnetic dubber or tape machine synchronized to the film projector.  |  IP: Logged Bill Gabel Film God Posts: 3873 From: Technicolor / Postworks NY, USA Registered: Jan 2002 posted 03-26-2009 11:38 AM                     Most Festival prints are Showprints and afew are answer prints. But after afew Festivals and Press screenings, Premieres they get banged up. As to the cues, the lab scribes the cues to those prints. The prints you get at your theatre, depends on what part of the food chain your on. The High Quality prints (EK, Showprints, Wet Gate, answer prints) go to the Studio, Top First Run Markets like New York City, Los Angeles and afew other markets, Premieres. The major studios make a select amount of these prints for each release. The regular release prints you see at your theatres are made in large runs at the labs. And cost less to produce. So the problems of lab splices and other issues are mainly from regular release prints. At the end of the year the studios hold or make extra Showprints for Academy and other Guild related screenings.  |  IP: Logged Scott Norwood Film God Posts: 8146 From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas) Registered: Jun 99 posted 03-26-2009 12:22 PM                        So, what is the difference between a "showprint" and an "EK print"? Are both printed from the camera negative?  |  IP: Logged Bill Gabel Film God Posts: 3873 From: Technicolor / Postworks NY, USA Registered: Jan 2002 posted 03-26-2009 01:31 PM                     It's just how the lab labels the print. Some labs use one of those different names for the same item.  |  IP: Logged William T. Parr Jedi Master Film Handler Posts: 823 From: Cedar Park, TX Registered: Nov 2000 posted 03-26-2009 03:16 PM                     I am John's Back Up at the Paramount and had to show the screening of Observe and Report to the WB folks prior to SxSW screenning that night. The print was indeed hand marked with Clint Phare cues. and it had no other splices in it lab or otherwise that I was able to tell. I also ran the first showing of Richard Linklaters new upcoming movie called Nostradamus and I, it was a Show Print that had no information on the sides of the print. In fact there was nothing but black on the outer sides of the sprockets, almost looked like it could have been a studio master. It was shipped in on cores from Deluxe Labs and was labled Show Print on the outside of the box and film cans. It to had Clint Phare cue marks as I recall. The other two prints I checked in had the factory Black Dots for cues, but had no Lab or other splices in them. The name of the two prints escape me but John projected both of them.  |  IP: Logged John Stewart Film Handler Posts: 67 From: Austin, TX, USA Registered: Sep 2001 posted 03-29-2009 01:55 PM                     Ahh, the joys of showing brand new prints. Clean and sharp...sometimes. No more dye transfers at least not for now. Don't know if Technicolor will ever trot that out again. As Todd said, all but one print had hand made cues. We ran maybe 4 or 5 prints reel to reel, maybe 4 that were pre-plattered and brought to us and the rest was video. That has been the ratio for the past 3 or 4 years. J  |  IP: Logged Dave Macaulay Film God Posts: 2321 From: Toronto, Canada Registered: Apr 2001 posted 03-30-2009 04:14 PM                     As a rule no print is made from the camera negative. The risk of destroying it is too great. Current practice is to scan a digital IP after seeing "dailies" recorded from camera video taps. The DI is projected as video to check for camera problems, sometimes a true "daily" print is still struck (ie "cut, print it") to check for camera problems but it isn't always done any more. Even if you aren't using DI, a show print would not be made from the original negative except in a real low-budget operation... and they would be using video cameras these days anyway. The special show prints are basically done on a lower speed printer, and probably used in color timing and approving the "mother" interpositives and printing negatives. Several prints are generated in this production step and they can be used for pre-release screenings, festivals, special shows, etc. These usually don't have any negative cues punched (the black spots) so Clint Phare markers are used.  |  IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

Printer-friendly view of this topic

Hop To: Select a Forum: Category: Operations -------------------- Digital Cinema Forum Film Handlers' Forum Large Format Forum Ground Level Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets Category: Community -------------------- Film-Yak Film Handlers' Movie Reviews The Afterlife Bob Maar's Joke-A-Thon Category: Classified -------------------- Equipment and Supplies Wanted/For Sale Help Wanted/Seeking Employment Category: System -------------------- Software Beta Testing Forum

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.