my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Dolby Toning CP45's (Page 1)

This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2

Author Topic: Dolby Toning CP45's Oliver Harper Film Handler Posts: 29 From: Cambridge, United kingdom Registered: Mar 2007 posted 09-08-2009 04:47 AM                     I run a projection booth for Cineworld in the UK. I have come across a lot projectionists who have been trained at others site to Dolby tone the CP45s in the Dolby SR channel instead of MONO!.. We have had staff transfer over to our booth and i gave them a projector to maintain and was finding every week they had to do major adjustments to the processor to get the sound back to normal. Then i found out what channel they had it set in, but the member of the staff said that was the way he was shown.I grabbed the manual and made him read the Dolby toning section to show how its done. Has anyone else come across this?  |  IP: Logged Gavin Lewarne Master Film Handler Posts: 278 From: Plymouth, UK Registered: Aug 2009 posted 09-08-2009 05:12 AM                     Actually I do thin with our CP45, but for a very good reason. For ages i could not figure out why most of the dialog was being sent to Centre + left and we had terribly unbalanced sound in the auditorium. dialog leakage into left + surrounds and virtually nothing from right. I toned and toned my head off in MONO and A-TYPE (my CP45s manual actually says to do it in A-Type), checkd slit azimuth, focus and pink noise response. everything was as good as it could be. We even called in a service engineer from Sound Associates but even then could not figure it out. Everntually i though, Heck with it, and toned it in SR. ever since, now get balanced sound with dialog correctly being decoded and no surround leakage! If i tone in mono and switch to SR with the loop still running, there is actually very very little difference needed between the modes to get the green's lit evenly. for me, it was just half a turn of the right trim pots. but evidently, that was enough to throw off the decode. Oh, and check that the input type jumper is set correctly. we have jaxlite XLA-650 preamps in our projectors that have an unbalanced output, but for the years prior to my employment the CP45 had been set to Balanced inputs, leading to huger amounts of crosstalk than you can get even with a badly aligned A-Chain. Once i corrected this to Unbalanced and re-toned in SR, decoding is absolutely spot on. We have even had customers commenting on the quality of our sound compared to the all-new multiplex nearby  |  IP: Logged Oliver Harper Film Handler Posts: 29 From: Cambridge, United kingdom Registered: Mar 2007 posted 09-08-2009 05:31 AM                     Thats strange your manual says A-type. We havent' had issues with leakage, the only complaints we get is that there is hardly any use of the surround channels. usually depends where the customers are sitting or I just crank the volume up. When i was dolby toning the other day switching between SR and MONO the signals were completely different where as the mono only need a minor adjustment the SR channel was way out!. We are using the Kelmar pre-amps for our sreens..and they are rubbish, we just recently got some modified ones for the Dolby EX screens and they work a treat. Where can i check the input jumper?  |  IP: Logged Gavin Lewarne Master Film Handler Posts: 278 From: Plymouth, UK Registered: Aug 2009 posted 09-08-2009 05:39 AM                     how weird! the jumpers for input type are located directly behind the level trimpots. but are swapped, eg: the jumper for Proj1 input type is behind the trimpots for Proj2 and vice-versa (caused me much confusion in the past!) if you cant find them i will take a photo later. thats strange your level dirrerence between mono and SR. can you take a photo of the EQ settings? i found out that setting the treble freq too hgh can have an affect on the sound path (at least on mine). I think the CP45 is just old and weird, and mine certainly has its quirks  |  IP: Logged Oliver Harper Film Handler Posts: 29 From: Cambridge, United kingdom Registered: Mar 2007 posted 09-08-2009 06:02 AM                     Yeah sure Gavin, i will take pic and post tomorrow. CP45's are still getting installed in new theaters, its crazy its old technology. Fair enough if the screen is small and a CP45 would be fine but you can better sound from Bluray..Paying like £8 to see a film and you get sound in just SR, we get customers complaining all the time that they can get better sound at home!..  |  IP: Logged Jonathan Worthing Master Film Handler Posts: 384 From: Hereford, UK Registered: Apr 2001 posted 09-08-2009 06:16 AM                     [QUOTE] my CP45s manual actually says to do it in A-Type/QUOTE] Are you sure. I have looked at my hard copys (Install & User) & the on-line copy on Filmtech & they both say to do tone in MONO Format 01. This is the way Dolby Teach on there training course. Jonathan  |  IP: Logged Gavin Lewarne Master Film Handler Posts: 278 From: Plymouth, UK Registered: Aug 2009 posted 09-08-2009 06:55 AM                     absolutely sure! if i tone in MONO and switch to A-Type, no adjustments are necessary, they tim to exactly the same level. Only SR is very very slightly different on ours. like i said, only half a turn of the right trims is necessary betweern Mono / A-Type and SR  |  IP: Logged Demetris Thoupis Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1240 From: Aradippou, Larnaca, Cyprus Registered: Apr 2001 posted 09-08-2009 07:13 AM                     Actually on page 45 of the film-tech install manual it clearly indicates A-Type! In the film-tech user manual in page 17 it says mono. Which to believe?  |  IP: Logged Gavin Lewarne Master Film Handler Posts: 278 From: Plymouth, UK Registered: Aug 2009 posted 09-08-2009 07:20 AM                     they are probably both right. as i indicated, on our unit there are no differences in trim levels between mono and a-type when toning.  |  IP: Logged John Hawkinson Film God Posts: 2273 From: Cambridge, MA, USA Registered: Feb 2002 posted 09-08-2009 08:23 AM                     There have been several threads on this. Try searching. It is supposed to be Mono for all Dolby processors. On some processors it makes a difference, on other models it does not matter (depending on how the internal circuitry is set up). I don't recall for the CP45. I believe a level difference between mono and SR is expected. Generally speaking SR has more dynamic range so more gain is applied, relative to A-type, which should be the same as Mono. The mystery here is why Gavin's CP45 decodes SR badly when calibrated in mono. The obvious choices are a bad SR decoder card (have you tried swapping?) and a bad batch of Dolby tone (those have happened -- what's your batch date?). Also, there's quite a lot of variation in the metering sometimes. Try hooking a DMM up to the test points and seeing what voltage you actually hit in both cases. (For most processors it is 300mV nominal, though I don't recall for the CP45...). --jhawk  |  IP: Logged Gordon McLeod Film God Posts: 9532 From: Toronto Ontario Canada Registered: Jun 99 posted 09-08-2009 10:09 AM                     mono enhancement must be disabled for calibration also check the preamp jumper settings for cell vs reverse scan reader  |  IP: Logged Gavin Lewarne Master Film Handler Posts: 278 From: Plymouth, UK Registered: Aug 2009 posted 09-08-2009 01:04 PM                     well, in regard to my cp45 decoding badly, i swapped with a brand new 222sr/a and had exactly the same result, so put the old one back. I am very happy with the sound mine produces when calibrated in SR and i dont see it as a problem for our application. what is interesting is why mine behaves differently to olivers. and why his should have such a massive level difference between mono and SR calibration. my preamps have no jumnpers, either on the casing and connector or on the circuit itself. its simply signal in and out.  |  IP: Logged Gordon McLeod Film God Posts: 9532 From: Toronto Ontario Canada Registered: Jun 99 posted 09-08-2009 01:47 PM                     J1 and J2 seect balanced or unbalanced inputs ie reverse scan or cell J7 selects mono enhanced and regular mono calibration must be in regular mono  |  IP: Logged Marin Zorica Jedi Master Film Handler Posts: 671 From: Biograd na Moru, Croatia Registered: May 2003 posted 09-08-2009 05:06 PM                     You are sure there are no jumpers on preamp? Maybe it's some earlier model without it, and signal path between MONO/A/SR is a bit different? So measuremnts are different? But A/SR path should be same, as same card is used for decoding both, only don't know where LED are measuring, probably on input of cat 222? So levels should be same.....  |  IP: Logged Manny Knowles "What are these things and WHY are they BLUE???" Posts: 4247 From: Bloomington, IN, USA Registered: Feb 2002 posted 09-08-2009 05:19 PM                     After tone, I like to run a loop of 69P (Pink Noise) in SR to verify via signal LED's that the signal is being steered (primarily) to center and also there should be a null in the surrounds. This is to verify the status of the other alignment variables that could affect proper decoding. A certain amount of signal leakage to the other channels is to be expected. It's not a full-on alignment at this stage so I don't bust out the scope; I just do a quick look-n-listen to verify status.  |  IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2

Printer-friendly view of this topic

Hop To: Select a Forum: Category: Operations -------------------- Digital Cinema Forum Film Handlers' Forum Large Format Forum Ground Level Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets Category: Community -------------------- Film-Yak Film Handlers' Movie Reviews The Afterlife Bob Maar's Joke-A-Thon Category: Classified -------------------- Equipment and Supplies Wanted/For Sale Help Wanted/Seeking Employment Category: System -------------------- Software Beta Testing Forum

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.