my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » uses for different sprocket and pad roller types

Author Topic: uses for different sprocket and pad roller types Scott Norwood Film God Posts: 8146 From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas) Registered: Jun 99 posted 10-19-2009 11:42 AM                        The Century projectors in my screening room were built in 1970 and have CS-type sprockets. I assume that these are original to the machines (they had been lightly used when I got them a few years ago). They work fine with KS-perf film. They also have plastic pad rollers. [side question: when ordering a new projector, is one given a choice of sprocket types?] I see that one can purchase VKF, CS, "standard," and "posi-trol" sprockets. Also, both metal and plastic pad rollers are available. What are the relative advantages of each sprocket type? Why would one choose one type over another (other than CS sprockets for CS-perf prints)? And which pad roller type (plastic vs. metal) is preferred?  |  IP: Logged Tim Reed Better Projection Pays Posts: 5246 From: Northampton, PA Registered: Sep 1999 posted 10-19-2009 02:26 PM                       Scott, I wouldn't even consider CS sprockets today. VKF (Very Kind to Film), have teeth which are a better fit to the perf, and I think they will also handle CS perfs, too. Not sure about specifics of Positrols... Nylon pad rollers don't require lubrication - you only have to make sure the shaft is clean and dry.  |  IP: Logged Robert Minichino Master Film Handler Posts: 350 From: Haskell, NJ, USA Registered: Dec 2005 posted 10-19-2009 02:57 PM                        From the literature I've seen, positrol sprockets have a wider sprocket on one side that improves horizontal stability by completely filling the perf. The VKF sprockets are wider than CS sprockets (the VKF-2 wider still), and have radiused edges.  |  IP: Logged Kenneth Wuepper Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1026 From: Saginaw, MI, USA Registered: Feb 2002 posted 10-19-2009 03:09 PM                     Scott, I can assure you that VKF intermittent sprockets WILL DAMAGE the CS perfs. A film festival at our theatre did not exchange the VKFs for the CS intermittent sprockets and destroyed a full reel of mag 35mm. The VKFs are a snug fit in the holes of standard prints so they would tear open CS sized holes. KEN  |  IP: Logged Tim Reed Better Projection Pays Posts: 5246 From: Northampton, PA Registered: Sep 1999 posted 10-19-2009 04:13 PM                       Maybe I'm thinking of the first-issue VKFs... seems like I remember one of their selling points was that they would work with Fox holes? This was late 70s, of course.  |  IP: Logged Robert Minichino Master Film Handler Posts: 350 From: Haskell, NJ, USA Registered: Dec 2005 posted 10-19-2009 04:45 PM                        Based on the published dimensions, the VKF sprockets should fit CS perfs so long as it's not badly shrunken. Positrols look like they'd make a big mess out of CS perfs, though.  |  IP: Logged Ian Parfrey Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1049 From: Imbil Australia 26 deg 27' 42.66" S 152 deg 42' 23.40" E Registered: Feb 2009 posted 10-19-2009 05:13 PM                     Whether you go the C/S, VKF or Positrol sprockets would surely depend on whether you either intend (or are equipped) to run Foxhole mag/mag-opt prints. If you dont have the intention of running foxhole, then go the VKF or Positrol route. They generally run quieter anyway. Cheers Ian  |  IP: Logged Mark Gulbrandsen Resident Trollmaster Posts: 16657 From: Music City Registered: Jun 99 posted 10-19-2009 06:55 PM                     Its the other way round. You can't use Posi-Trol sprockets with CS type perfs at all!!! It'll ruin the print. VKF, especially the latest gestation VKF-2 work well as long as the print is not badly shrunken. If it is then use CS type sprockets. I ran Positrol sprockets on all my dailies projectors Centurys) and the image from them is lke it's nailed up on the wall. They remove the last vestage of lateral film movement completely. You can remove all the lateral guidance rails (which really do nothing at all anyway) and just use the lateral guide roller by itself. One side of the sprocket teeth are full fitting and copntrol the lateral movment of the film. The sprocket hole is also the best place to do the controling of the film. If you are running an old Super Simples the image can actually be frighteningly dead steady... The old Super Simplex and E-7 movements were the best of the best ever produced. Too bad the rest of the projector was so-so. If you run Positrols I reccomend the MNR4-22(?) LaVezzi steel pad rollers that have the oilite bushings in the ends. Aside from lasting really long the groove better matches the wide Positrol tooth. Mark  |  IP: Logged Scott Norwood Film God Posts: 8146 From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas) Registered: Jun 99 posted 10-19-2009 10:45 PM                        Wow. Now I am more confused. I have no intention of running anything with CS perfs. I also had no intention of changing out my sprockets when I started this thread, but would consider it if someone can explain exactly why CS sprockets are not a good choice when running KS-perf prints. I guess the source of my confusion is that there are at least four different types of sprockets for these machines, and I am curious as to the typical application for each.  |  IP: Logged Ian Parfrey Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1049 From: Imbil Australia 26 deg 27' 42.66" S 152 deg 42' 23.40" E Registered: Feb 2009 posted 10-20-2009 03:39 AM                     Scott. If this were my Screening room, here is what I would use. If there was any chance of C/S Mag-mag opt fox hole prints to be run, I'd go with the C/S sprockets. Im assuming here that these would be older, original prints anyway. Of course, the majority of 35/70mm machines will come equipped with C/S 35mm sprockets as standard. If there was any chance of running older, shrunken prints with standard KS sprocket holes, VKF sprockets would be my choice. If there were only new prints or new archive prints from original negs, then Id go with the Positrol. But for a general, all round solution for the majority of prints available, then the VKF would be my choice. C/S sprockets on the whole aren't really "bad" for KS holes, it's just the wider VKF and Positrol tooth spreads the driving load over a wider area of the sprocket hole, thereby theoretically reducing potential print damage. I hope this helps. I'm sure that the others will chime in with their personal preferences. Cheers Ian  |  IP: Logged Dick Prather Master Film Handler Posts: 259 From: Portland, OR, USA Registered: Feb 2002 posted 10-20-2009 03:53 PM                     It all boils down to what kind of prints you will be running. Century's have less of a problem with shrunken film because of their 16 tooth sprockets and only one pad roller per sprocket. VKF sprockets were designed to run mag with no problems. Tim is correct. The problem here is shrunken film especially mag. VKF's don't work here with XL 24 tooth sprockets and two pad rollers. The VKF II and Positrol sprockets will not run mag at all. I do run mag and other older films and did replace my VKF's in my XL's and RCA soundheads with new C/S sprockets. No problems since. Suggestions: Only new prints - VKF, VKF II, or Positrol All around no old mag - VKF Everything - VKF or C/S LaVezzi metal pad rollers are the best but require some maintainance. Machined PVC rollers will work fine as long as the shaft is kept clean. I think all new machines come from the factory with VKF or VKF II sprockets. Dick  |  IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

Printer-friendly view of this topic

Hop To: Select a Forum: Category: Operations -------------------- Digital Cinema Forum Film Handlers' Forum Large Format Forum Ground Level Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets Category: Community -------------------- Film-Yak Film Handlers' Movie Reviews The Afterlife Bob Maar's Joke-A-Thon Category: Classified -------------------- Equipment and Supplies Wanted/For Sale Help Wanted/Seeking Employment Category: System -------------------- Software Beta Testing Forum

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.