my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Visible Red LED Reader Compatibility with Vintage 35mm Prints (Page 1)

This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2

Author Topic: Visible Red LED Reader Compatibility with Vintage 35mm Prints Cris Capp Film Handler Posts: 5 From: Santa Monica, CA Registered: Oct 2009 posted 10-19-2009 03:20 PM                     Hi everyone, This is my first post here at Film Tech and I have a few questions for you all. Please go easy on me as I am a bit of a newbie when it comes to cinema technology! 1. Is there a difference between ‘redeveloped silver soundtrack’ prints and old original vintage/classic 35mm prints? Or are they one and the same? 2. Are the Analogue LED Sound Readers, such as the BACP RSTR-2000, compatible with very old original classic prints? Is there any loss of audio quality while playing a vintage film? So I understand that new cyan dye soundtracks require the LED readers. But I also read that the visible red LED is a compromise between old and new print technologies… and that by upgrading to the new visible Red LED’s I might actually have to sacrifice some sound quality when I show old vintage prints. I’ve heard that some archival presenters actually prefer the infrared LED’s to the visible red LED’s, is this true? My problem is that I have to show both- vintage films and new cyan dye films. From what I understand- the negative density affects amplitude of the sound signal… so I visible red LED used on a silver soundtrack results in less amplitude than a tungsten white light reader. This is taken from http://www.dyetracks.org/ci.os.0012.reddye.html Table 1 – Summary of Print Color Balances for Soundtracks Color Balance Target Densities Negative Density Recommended Negative Density IR Y C M Silver (Redeveloped) 1.40 1.64 3.37 3.58 2.18 2.20 High Magenta (Redeveloped) 1.09 1.44 2.02 3.82 2.88 2.70 Cyan (Dye) 0.36 0.36 2.14 0.38 2.60 2.70 Noise Performance “Tests have demonstrated that readers based on broad band tungsten, or white light, illumination sources are quieter than readers based on narrow band red LED illumination sources (660 ± 20 nm light energy spectrum). It is believed that this is due to the fact that when the track is illuminated by broad spectrum white light, the incoherent noise sources from each of the film's color layers add on a random basis and thus the noise "averages out." If a narrow spectral band illumination system is employed, this averaging cannot take place and thus the signal-to-noise ratio is impaired. This is true whether a standard silver track, high-magenta applicated track, or cyan dye track is being presented. It is also independent of the type of release stock employed.” http://www.dyetracks.org/ci.os.0012.reddye.html  |  IP: Logged Robert Minichino Master Film Handler Posts: 350 From: Haskell, NJ, USA Registered: Dec 2005 posted 10-19-2009 03:34 PM                        The redeveloped silver sound tracks (on color film) are effectively the same as on vintage color and B&W prints. We have RSTR-2000 readers and we mostly play older films; both variable area and variable density have worked great.  |  IP: Logged Mitchell Dvoskin Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1869 From: West Milford, NJ, USA Registered: Jan 2001 posted 10-19-2009 05:01 PM                     You may have problems using a red LED reader for some old variable density tracks. They work fine for variable area tracks. Fortunately, most older films have variable area tracks.  |  IP: Logged Damien Taylor Master Film Handler Posts: 493 From: Perth, Western Australia Registered: Apr 2007 posted 10-19-2009 06:36 PM                     Sometimes we have to bump the volume up on silver prints, which seems counter intuitive, but other than that they work fine.  |  IP: Logged Cris Capp Film Handler Posts: 5 From: Santa Monica, CA Registered: Oct 2009 posted 10-19-2009 07:13 PM                     How about when I get a film that has aged and turned a magenta pink color? We often show old prints from various studio archives that haven't been pulled out of a film can in years... and occassionally we get pink prints. I'm reading now that magenta films will have no sound when played with red LED's. I'm having the feeling I want to keep my traditional exciter lamps in conjunction with upgrading to red LED. I have a Simplex Model 5 Star Sound Mechanism. And the projectors themselves are Simplex 35 Model PR1014. Does BACP make a penthouse Analogue LED Reader? Is it even possible to have analogue reader in a penthouse configuration? I only have a CP65 Processor... and no sources for a DA20... and no budget for a CP650 so I'm not planning to go digital anytime soon. How can I best configure my system to play with both tungsten exciter lamps and red LED readers? My room acoustics are very harsh so that's why I'm concerned about any drop in audio quality in relation to whatever upgrade we finally choose.  |  IP: Logged Jim Cassedy Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1661 From: San Francisco, CA Registered: Dec 2006 posted 10-19-2009 09:13 PM                     Several years ago I ran a LOT of vintage prints at an older theater that still had a mono sound system. I had no trouble, even on very pink prints, when they upgraded to the "red readers", except as someone else noted on SOME variable density sound tracks. Mostly those that had VD tracks which were low in contrast. But this was an infrequent occurance. I can think of only two times in almost 3 years that this issue came up. We simply had to turn up the volume a bit more, which increased background noise & hiss from both the old tracks and the aging sound system. Chances are I'd have had some problems with theses particular tracks even with exciter lamp readers. This was a "change-over" house with two projectos. When we were installing the red-readers, I first did one projector and then we ran a few we"ear" tests where we did changeovers between the projector with the new red-readers and the unmodifed one which still had the exciter lamp type, since we had the same concerns as you have about being able to play some of the older sound tracks. I didn't have time to do full audio-electronic analysis of the sound between the two types, but simple 'ear' tests, with several diffrent prints and types of tracks showed the difference between the two readers to be pretty much negligible and often totally inaudible at our location. (I don't mean the sound track was inaudible- I mean that there was ofen no audible difference between the two readers in a simple listening test)  |  IP: Logged Monte L Fullmer Film God Posts: 8367 From: Nampa, Idaho, USA Registered: Nov 2004 posted 10-19-2009 09:39 PM                     quote: Cris Capp Does BACP make a penthouse Analogue LED Reader? In the real sense, it wouldn't work since the analog track is recorded 21 frames ahead of the picture and in marketing terms, it wouldn't be feasable to create any such hardware/software to delay the sound information backwards from the optical track to match picture frame since there is no definite need, nor demand for it. Now, if someone who is electronic smart could conger up such a delaying device for a creation of a penthouse optical readers (or even a convienient swapping from LED to filament bulb for the basement end of the spectrum) so one could have both worlds - exciter and LED playbacks, but then the user would have to pay up the nose to have one custom built for such an occasion.. Also, if you can find a white LED to swap out in a RSLH-2 module along with having the stock RSLH-2 LED module (since they're so danged easy to change out, but you might have fits with your pre-amp settings by lowering the gain down some using white light...), then this form of swapout could be more feasable. -Monte  |  IP: Logged Mark Gulbrandsen Resident Trollmaster Posts: 16657 From: Music City Registered: Jun 99 posted 10-19-2009 10:00 PM                     Typically they will sound much cleaner. You will also be hearing all the recorded frequenbcy the film is able to muster up. The only tracks they won't play straight out of the gate are old push pull and some off types of single unilateral variable area tracks. BTW: You should be able to play push pull if you re-wire the reader to do so. Mark  |  IP: Logged Christopher Seo Jedi Master Film Handler Posts: 530 From: Los Angeles, CA Registered: Jun 99 posted 10-20-2009 01:16 AM                     Actually (as was mentioned before somewhere) there is at least one company, Sondor, which manufactures a penthouse that accomodates a red LED optical reader (with digital delay). Dolby Digital and DTS are also available. Here's the link. I would think it's pretty expensive though. With effort, some kind of home-brew solution could work. For example, an analog/digital basement reader could possibly be modified for dual red/infrared optical pickups. I also recall that Component Engineering made a basement reader that used white light for the digital, which could again be modified for another analog pickup. I've run many older prints on red readers, and the sound quality has generally been good to excellent. However, there are occasions when I've wondered if white light would produce a better result, such as with noisy or sibilant tracks. I've never encountered an unplayable track. There's certainly no need to worry about faded prints, since the redeveloped track has silver and does not fade along with the picture. The single-unilateral variable-area tracks I've come across play fine as well (and I think that would be a stereo pickup issue in general). Ultimately, it would be nice to have both white and red readers, but red light is necessary for newer prints and reverse scan is best for all prints.  |  IP: Logged Robert Minichino Master Film Handler Posts: 350 From: Haskell, NJ, USA Registered: Dec 2005 posted 10-20-2009 07:28 AM                        quote: Monte L Fullmer In the real sense, it wouldn't work since the analog track is recorded 21 frames ahead of the picture and in marketing terms, it wouldn't be feasable to create any such hardware/software to delay the sound information backwards from the optical track to match picture frame since there is no definite need, nor demand for it. Once you had a way to handle the film and mount the reader, all you would need would be an off-the-shelf digital delay.  |  IP: Logged Richard P. May Expert Film Handler Posts: 243 From: Los Angeles, CA Registered: Jan 2006 posted 10-20-2009 09:37 AM                     To speak from the viewpoint of a restoration lab, the red LED readers work just fine with everything we've thrown at them. We are working with tracks as far back as 1929 variable density. The only problem I have ever run into has been a color restoration with a VD track, printed with the now obsolete hi-magenta system. The magenta in the track filtered out enough of the red exciter light to make the track very poor. This was most evident several years ago, when I was at WB. We restored a 1938 short subject, shot in Technicolor. The musical sections were variable area, and the dialog density. The area played just fine, but the density dropped way down. It was necessary to reprint changing the filters in the sound head of the printing machine, to alter the color of the track. Other than this, I'd say don't be concerned.  |  IP: Logged Louis Bornwasser Film God Posts: 4441 From: prospect ky usa Registered: Mar 2005 posted 10-20-2009 10:23 AM                        I have heard some complaints, but in every case, it was possible to get proper operation with critical alignment. I guess what I am saying is that the reader was not "perfectly" installed at first. When tweaked, it worked just fine. Apparenly there is some latitude in non-critical playback of current films. Louis  |  IP: Logged Robert Minichino Master Film Handler Posts: 350 From: Haskell, NJ, USA Registered: Dec 2005 posted 10-20-2009 10:47 AM                        We ran a print with a silver VD track earlier this month on our RSTR-2000 readers and it sounded great.  |  IP: Logged Sam D. Chavez Film God Posts: 2153 From: Martinez, CA USA Registered: Aug 2003 posted 10-20-2009 10:52 AM                       To answer Monte, we have made a couple of penthouse analog readers and it's really quite easy to modify the DSTR-20 to play analog tracks. It's then a snap to install either a standard red LED bracket (RSLH-2) or the Infra Red module (RSLH-2IR)with two screws. There is a very slight issue with the absolute focus point changes between the two LEDs. It's fairly trivial amount like maybe 2 dB at 14 Khz so I would keep the RED in best focus and if you play a 70 year old silver print a tiny bit out of focus, it's our little secret, or you can split the difference. The real issue is sync and there are stereo, variable delay, phase coherent delay lines out there that can deal with this. I can hear Guttag winding up to correct me as I write.  |  IP: Logged Steve Guttag We forgot the crackers Gromit!!! Posts: 12814 From: Annapolis, MD Registered: Dec 1999 posted 10-20-2009 11:27 AM                     What? Did I hear my name? Facts and fiction run again. The Visible red LED will work fine with many soundtracks. Certainly they play fine with cyan tracks...they also do okay with High Magenta. I haven't had a problem with them on B&W tracks either. On magenta VD tracks they don't really work. Where they are a crap shoot are on normal color stock films with a regular redeveloped sound track. Some play okay others have horrible cross-mod distortion. It isn't that you don't get audio but it is VERY harsh...it can sound like you amp is clipping even though you are not over modulating anything. If any of you have the DTS test reel that was made before the cyan crap came along (Dolby-A analog track)...listen to that reel in analog on a red reader...it will show cross-mod distortion pretty well (ours sure does). What some people consider good/acceptable and even correct amazes me. A red reader on a print exhibiting cross-mod distortion is nasty to my ears. We have some facilities that cater to the older moves that have IR LEDs. We had one facility that had IR we switched to visible for cyan tracks and the next conventional track they got their curator asked about putting the IRs back because the soundtrack didn't sound right (it was the cross mod distortion). But again, it is a crap shoot...some prints DO play fine on either reader...some don't. As for the refocus between IR and visible...it is more than a dB or two at 14K...it is pretty dramatic, really. I'm sure it varies by lens design too. Steve  |  IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2

Printer-friendly view of this topic

Hop To: Select a Forum: Category: Operations -------------------- Digital Cinema Forum Film Handlers' Forum Large Format Forum Ground Level Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets Category: Community -------------------- Film-Yak Film Handlers' Movie Reviews The Afterlife Bob Maar's Joke-A-Thon Category: Classified -------------------- Equipment and Supplies Wanted/For Sale Help Wanted/Seeking Employment Category: System -------------------- Software Beta Testing Forum

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.