my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Qst: Dolby Cp 500 Vs Cp 650 Or Cp 65. A/D Converters- What is best Sound Combination? (Page 1)

This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2

Author Topic: Qst: Dolby Cp 500 Vs Cp 650 Or Cp 65. A/D Converters- What is best Sound Combination? Martin Daian Expert Film Handler Posts: 227 From: Montevideo, Uruguay Registered: Jul 2003 posted 03-18-2010 02:58 PM                    Hello, i need to evacuate some dudes: I am working to define what is the best quality processor for Analog and Digital: I have this processors availables: CP 500 Digital CP 65 w/ two Cat 350 SR cards & Dolby DA 20 Decoder and SA10 EX Surround Adapter CP 650 Digital I receive some information about the CP 500 that in the Analog to Digital conversion the bit rate is not too good like the A/D converters on the CP 650 - Is True ? If is true the analog sound quality on the CP 500 will be little less in quality thant the CP 650 ? I love too much the CP 500, is a nice cosmetic processor and robust, i prefer to use CP 500 allways if the Analog and Digital sound quality are the best, if the CP 650 have better sound quality in Analog or Digital i will need to use the CP 650 instead the CP 500, Some people say that the CP 65 with 2 Cat 350 SR cards and a Dolby DA 20 decoder with an SA EX 10 unit to decode EX Surrounds will be the best combination for Analog and Digital sound, is this true? The Dolby DA 20 have the same Digital Sample bit rate quality that on the CP 650 and CP 500 ? Also i am adding a bi-amplified croossover, i have an Ultra Stereo CM-680 Both Monitor and Crossover, is this good or exist a better crossover?, the Dolby crossover cards that uses built in the processors (Cp 500 & CP 650 Crossover Cards) are the best sound quality option ? Appreciatte your experiences about to help me to define what is the best processors combination to finalize the best sound rack. Thanks, Martin  |  IP: Logged Louis Bornwasser Film God Posts: 4441 From: prospect ky usa Registered: Mar 2005 posted 03-19-2010 12:45 AM                        To my ear the 500 was a step back from the 65/20. Best of all is the 650 which is still fully supported by Dolby. Louis  |  IP: Logged Demetris Thoupis Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1240 From: Aradippou, Larnaca, Cyprus Registered: Apr 2001 posted 03-19-2010 01:17 AM                     I still think that one of the best sounding Dolby processors is the CP65 in both analogue and digital domain. The only drawback is the lack of full equalisation on the surround channels but that can easily be done if you use the EX decoder! CP65 with Cat 350 in my opinion. I never liked the analogue sound of the CP500. The CP650 is mainly a Digital addressed processor. Demetris  |  IP: Logged Sean McKinnon Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1712 From: Peabody Massachusetts Registered: Sep 2000 posted 03-19-2010 03:12 PM                        I always prefered the SR from the 65 over the 500. I may be wrong here but I think the 500 uses an emulated SR? I don't think there is a difference in the digital domain between the da20 and the 500 (except the lack of full EQ on the surround channels)  |  IP: Logged Luciano Brigite Master Film Handler Posts: 277 From: Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil Registered: Jan 2002 posted 03-19-2010 07:06 PM                     My vote goes to CP65 with SR cards together with DA20. Didn't hear any other system that beats the sound of these two together.  |  IP: Logged Steve Guttag We forgot the crackers Gromit!!! Posts: 12814 From: Annapolis, MD Registered: Dec 1999 posted 03-20-2010 07:51 AM                     I would go for the CP650. The CP500 can take Cat 300/350s (with the right daughter board. I'm not a huge fan of its overall sound quality though...a bit harsh. The CP650 sounds pretty good and its SR emulation is pretty good too. Steve  |  IP: Logged Mark J. Marshall Film God Posts: 3188 From: New Castle, DE, USA Registered: Aug 2002 posted 03-20-2010 05:18 PM                    Steve, To clarify... "sounds pretty good", or "sounds the best"?  |  IP: Logged Mark Gulbrandsen Resident Trollmaster Posts: 16657 From: Music City Registered: Jun 99 posted 03-20-2010 05:37 PM                     I'd pass on both of those and get yourself a used Panastereo CSP-1200. Nothing else out there even comes close to it's performance... even it's SR is better then Dolby's own. Mark  |  IP: Logged Steve Guttag We forgot the crackers Gromit!!! Posts: 12814 From: Annapolis, MD Registered: Dec 1999 posted 03-20-2010 07:51 PM                     Of the group listed, sounds best...except possibly for SR analog. Steve  |  IP: Logged Tony Bandiera Jr Film God Posts: 3067 From: Moreland Idaho Registered: Apr 2004 posted 03-20-2010 10:38 PM                     Steve, I take it you mean when the CP-65 is equipped with the CAT 222 SR/A card? I think the CP-65 sounds best in SR when CAT 300/350 cards are used. I do agree the CP-650 has excellent analog sound, better than the CP-500 (or the hideous CP-45) and better than the CP-200. Mark, The Panastereo may have better sound, but is it really wise to get involved with equipment that is no longer made? I donated a CP-650 to my screening room at UC Irvine to replace the CP-65 since Dolby no longer supports it. (That and it makes the room set-up identical to the new screening room I just installed there.)  |  IP: Logged Steve Guttag We forgot the crackers Gromit!!! Posts: 12814 From: Annapolis, MD Registered: Dec 1999 posted 03-20-2010 11:53 PM                     I truly dislike the Cat 222SR/A...it isn't good SR emulation. The CP200 is the best Dolby analog processor, period. When the 517/560 came out, it got the best analog output stage too. The CP650 is better than the CP65 in most every respect, except SR noise reduction. But of the SR emulators, it is the best I've heard. Steve  |  IP: Logged Martin Daian Expert Film Handler Posts: 227 From: Montevideo, Uruguay Registered: Jul 2003 posted 03-21-2010 01:59 AM                    Thank you to Everybody that help to form my sound rack. Now i will see that the best SR analog processor is the CP 65 with Cat 350 SR cards used in combination with a DA 20 and an SA10 EX unit, with the SA 10 EX Surround Adapter will have the fully equalized surround channels, now the only diference between this big size system (CP 65 + DA 20 + SA 10) combination and the CP 650 unit is that CP 650 will be more practice on the adjustments also i have the dudes if the adjustments in the CP 65 Processor will be stable compared to the CP 650 adjustments, the CP 65 have analog equalization and output levels with manual pots, the CP 650 have all digitalized and maybe the adjustments will be perfectly stable, of corse less the Optical Preamplifiers Levels that varies when the Red led on the soundhead readers are little disgasted and need to readjust the Optical Preamplifiers Levels or the power voltage on the PS of the reverse scan system.  |  IP: Logged Sean McKinnon Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1712 From: Peabody Massachusetts Registered: Sep 2000 posted 03-21-2010 11:36 AM                        Steve, What are the differences in the digital portion of the cp650 compared to the DA-20/SA-10? Does the 650 have better D to A conversion?  |  IP: Logged Tony Bandiera Jr Film God Posts: 3067 From: Moreland Idaho Registered: Apr 2004 posted 03-21-2010 02:34 PM                     Sean, shooting from the hip I would say yes as D-A technology has gotten better and less expensive in the decade or so since the DA-20 was born...  |  IP: Logged Steve Guttag We forgot the crackers Gromit!!! Posts: 12814 From: Annapolis, MD Registered: Dec 1999 posted 03-21-2010 03:13 PM                     With the CP650, everything remains in the digital domain. The CP650 has superior output devices too. I suspect that the digital portion of Dolby AC3 is restricted by the era in which it was born and the CP650 can't improve upon that. As for bit rate...I believe the CP650 is a 24 bit processor, the CP500/DA20 are 18-bit, IRC. Overall, I just prefer the CP650 audio quality for the digital stuff. The CP65 suffers from relatively noisy VCAs on the L,C, R and S channels due to the Cat 242 (1985 technology). The EQ on the surrounds of the CP65 is pretty pathetic. I don't like the "snaps" when the CP65 changes format and with the DA20/CP65 system, the transition between digital and analog is always audible (plus the surround level jumps by 3dB in analog). Steve  |  IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2

Printer-friendly view of this topic

Hop To: Select a Forum: Category: Operations -------------------- Digital Cinema Forum Film Handlers' Forum Large Format Forum Ground Level Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets Category: Community -------------------- Film-Yak Film Handlers' Movie Reviews The Afterlife Bob Maar's Joke-A-Thon Category: Classified -------------------- Equipment and Supplies Wanted/For Sale Help Wanted/Seeking Employment Category: System -------------------- Software Beta Testing Forum

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.