my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » AMC WC has one of the best 35mm presentations..but WTF is with the sound? (Page 1)

This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2

Author Topic: AMC WC has one of the best 35mm presentations..but WTF is with the sound? Tom Petrov Five Guys Lover Posts: 1121 From: El Paso, TX Registered: Jan 2003 posted 11-29-2010 12:20 AM                    Ok, I went to the AMC Winston Churchill 24 tonight. I was Monsters which was great. I was hesitant on seeing a movie there because I worried about how good the picture was going to look. Well, the 35mm film presentation was OUTSTANDING. I looks to me like this AMC WC is clearly taking the film look seriously. I went into a few other auditoriums and the film looked just as good. The only print with issues was some Indian film which looked badly used. The print of Monster had really good sharpness and the contrast and framing were excellent. Screen was small, maybe 25 feet. My big issue is with the sound. Who came up with the rediculous idea of having the surrounds at the top of the wall/roof.....It was horrible. Not surround sound at all. Also, the speakers behind the screen for some reason did not seem to be centred with the screen. It seemed as tho the speakers were higher up that normal. Overall great 35mm film look. Terrible sound. Film: **** Sound: zero  |  IP: Logged Monte L Fullmer Film God Posts: 8367 From: Nampa, Idaho, USA Registered: Nov 2004 posted 11-29-2010 03:10 AM                     quote: Tom Petrov the speakers behind the screen for some reason did not seem to be centred with the screen. It seemed as tho the speakers were higher up that normal Was this complex smaller then screens were added? There could be a hallway corridor behind the screen where the speakers were placed on top of the corridor's framework ... seen that before in a local 6plex where the next house's exit had to pass behind the neighboring house, thus the speakers were mounted quite high behind the screen..and they were not tilted down towards the front center of the house making them sound not in the middle of the screen no matter where you sat...and to service them, you had to take half the screen apart off the frame (a floating screen) to get to the speakers since the screen is the same width as the auditorium-wall to wall common height screen. Sounds like the surrounds just didn't get the angle down enough no matter how high they were mounted as well ..  |  IP: Logged Brad Miller Administrator Posts: 17775 From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall) Registered: May 99 posted 11-29-2010 03:28 AM                     Sounds like an older complex with the (s)HITS sound system in it.  |  IP: Logged Richard Hamilton Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1341 From: Evansville, Indiana Registered: Jan 2000 posted 11-29-2010 08:30 AM                     quote: about 15 years ago, I walked into a room with a "suck" screen. It looked and sounded horrible. I told the local tech that I wasn't going to fuck with it. I cleaned the optics and set dolby levels and walked away. LJ fucked up with this idea. He must have been in bed with the vampire Old post from a couple years ago. Good old Larry Jacobson and his suck screen. I forget the "Vampires" name, but he placed a single surround in each rear corner. Rick  |  IP: Logged Louis Bornwasser Film God Posts: 4441 From: prospect ky usa Registered: Mar 2005 posted 11-29-2010 08:46 AM                        The suck screen guy was Glenn Berggren. Louis  |  IP: Logged Richard Hamilton Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1341 From: Evansville, Indiana Registered: Jan 2000 posted 11-29-2010 09:35 AM                     Louis, Then I must have been misinformed back then, I forget which tech told me it was an L J design. Luckily I only ran into that screen once. Horns mounted from the ceiling above the screen and bass cabinets below the screen. Rick  |  IP: Logged Tom Petrov Five Guys Lover Posts: 1121 From: El Paso, TX Registered: Jan 2003 posted 11-29-2010 10:54 AM                    quote: Monte L Fullmer Was this complex smaller then screens were added? No, this was a brand new build in 1998. All 24 screens were built brand new.  |  IP: Logged Brad Miller Administrator Posts: 17775 From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall) Registered: May 99 posted 11-29-2010 12:06 PM                     Were they still doing SHITS auditoriums in 1998? I know they definitely learned from that mistake and don't do that anymore.  |  IP: Logged Jason Burroughs Jedi Master Film Handler Posts: 654 From: Allen, TX Registered: Jun 99 posted 11-29-2010 12:11 PM                     Not sure if it was true across the board, but the single surround were a cluster built by Community. They looked and sounded horrible. Oddly enough they actually sounded better when installed backwards (there was a designated Left and Right) Even the non-suck screens had the horns mounted above, and bass cabinets below the screen (Typically EV or EAW). Typically they used solid screens regardless if they were suck or suckless. Also they did not use any sound absorbing materials on the sides, and frequently also not on the back, instead on relying on angles to (in theory) reduce echo and reverberation. No matter how you slice it, it is impossible to get decent sound of these auditoriums.  |  IP: Logged Mark Gulbrandsen Resident Trollmaster Posts: 16657 From: Music City Registered: Jun 99 posted 11-29-2010 01:35 PM                     Actually the suck screen was great... It was AMC's poor implementation of sound that made it actually suck. Speakers above??? Oh please! That sucky screen had great light distribution if the lamphouse was correctly set up but all else stopped there.  |  IP: Logged Sam D. Chavez Film God Posts: 2153 From: Martinez, CA USA Registered: Aug 2003 posted 11-29-2010 03:15 PM                       Oh please, indeed! There was nothing like a suck screen that stopped sucking for a variety of reasons; like the area behind the screen filling with water and killing the suction motor. Made the screen look like a spent condom. When they worked light was fine but the screen behaved like a parabolic reflector for sound so you could hear conversation on the other side of the room. Where else would you put the speakers, Mark?  |  IP: Logged Mark Gulbrandsen Resident Trollmaster Posts: 16657 From: Music City Registered: Jun 99 posted 11-29-2010 07:16 PM                     Sam... Some of the best visual presentations I've ever seen were on suck screens in Florida AMC locations back when the screens were in their hay day and kept fairly well tweaked. As for the sound, I'd have gone with stereo headphones and low frequency transducers in the seats. Nothing out there is perfect and all things mechanical like this are as failure prone as the next piece in the chain which usually seems to be the power supply in what ever. Mark  |  IP: Logged Gordon McLeod Film God Posts: 9532 From: Toronto Ontario Canada Registered: Jun 99 posted 11-29-2010 11:43 PM                     ok the theatre in question doesn't have suck screens the torus was cleaver and solved light issues but if you work in this industry there trade offs i think if memory serves they have 4675 behind the screens with ev surrounds and yes they did choose a very high placement but also note the coverage was very even at that point  |  IP: Logged Victor Liorentas Jedi Master Film Handler Posts: 800 From: london ontario canada Registered: May 2009 posted 11-30-2010 01:26 AM                     Is the Torus and suck screen the same thing?  |  IP: Logged Tom Petrov Five Guys Lover Posts: 1121 From: El Paso, TX Registered: Jan 2003 posted 11-30-2010 01:55 AM                    quote: Gordon McLeod coverage was very even at that point Gord. What do you mean by this? I found the sound to be muffled and pointed away from the centre of the audience. I am not a tech but I am more than certain that the speakers should be point towards the middle of the seating section. Its seamed to me that the centre channel was aimed at the port glass window. The voices of the actors sounded like they were coming from the top of the screen.  |  IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2

Printer-friendly view of this topic

Hop To: Select a Forum: Category: Operations -------------------- Digital Cinema Forum Film Handlers' Forum Large Format Forum Ground Level Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets Category: Community -------------------- Film-Yak Film Handlers' Movie Reviews The Afterlife Bob Maar's Joke-A-Thon Category: Classified -------------------- Equipment and Supplies Wanted/For Sale Help Wanted/Seeking Employment Category: System -------------------- Software Beta Testing Forum

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.