my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Where can I find specs for component engineering analog reader.

Author Topic: Where can I find specs for component engineering analog reader. Eric Robinson Jedi Master Film Handler Posts: 538 From: Santa Rosa, CA Registered: Jan 2005 posted 01-14-2011 09:47 PM                     I'm attempting to start a gain structure analysis of a projector sound system. The first component is the analog reader. I'm trying to figure out where I can get the specs for the maximum output and the impedance. This is for a component engineering analog reader which is being used in the basement of an Apogee projector. And I'm also curious if the reader has two output levels which can be accessed by cutting a jumper on the analog reader board. Additionally supposing a piece of film has an over modulated soundtrack. That is to say that the soundtrack exceeds the confines of the area designated on the film (due to excessive amplitude modulation). Does the analog reader simply read this and pass it on, or would it likely be clipped off at the upper and lower rails of the reader?  |  IP: Logged Sam D. Chavez Film God Posts: 2153 From: Martinez, CA USA Registered: Aug 2003 posted 01-14-2011 11:03 PM                       "Additionally supposing a piece of film has an over modulated soundtrack. That is to say that the soundtrack exceeds the confines of the area designated on the film (due to excessive amplitude modulation). Does the analog reader simply read this and pass it on, or would it likely be clipped off at the upper and lower rails of the reader?" The analog optical track being variable area will clip the physical boundries of the film at about 8 dB over Dolby level. The film soundtrack will clip before the reader electronics even with the gain jumpers cut for 6dB more gain.  |  IP: Logged Tony Bandiera Jr Film God Posts: 3067 From: Moreland Idaho Registered: Apr 2004 posted 01-15-2011 03:55 PM                     And a film with a clipped optical track will sound like ass as Joe would say. I have a print of the "Addams Family Rap" trailer where the track is clipped several times, you can actually see the center separation of LT/RT disappear completely. On a solar celled machine the sound became oddly "mushed" at those points, on reverse scan with internal optical separation of the two channels of reader the sound gets very grating and crackly when it clips. Next time I get a hold of the trailer (it's at UC Irvine right now) I'll try to get a picture of the track to post here.  |  IP: Logged Manny Knowles "What are these things and WHY are they BLUE???" Posts: 4247 From: Bloomington, IN, USA Registered: Feb 2002 posted 01-15-2011 05:01 PM                     I love the term "optical clash"  |  IP: Logged Martin Daian Expert Film Handler Posts: 227 From: Montevideo, Uruguay Registered: Jul 2003 posted 01-15-2011 07:03 PM                    Hello Tony, i also have a print of Adams Familly Music Video Clip, is the same of that you have?, i note that the Lt and Rt signals on the optical space both are very wide and looks like exced the normal size, this will give a bad sound on a solar cell?, will be better readable with reverse scan?, some people say that the old silver tracks read better with white light from exiter lamps as original designed and not with red light, i know that reverse scans have better separation channels and maybe on this exceded tracks the reverse scan reads completelly, on solar cells i assume that when a exceded track are present will be exced the solar cell size capacity and the solar cell will not receive the correctly modulation of the soundtrack on the moment that the higher modulation traspassing the slit. Is possible to use the Analog Reverse Scan with a white led to read the old silver tracks? or also a exciter lamp will be used on reverse scan systems? I have this picture form my Adams Familly Video Clip where the soundtrack are exceded the normall size: See at the center of the soundtrack the big wide have flat limits of the soundtrack film space, so the sound are recorder exceded and in the moment that this occurs the soundtrack lost information, only receive a flat response saturated.  |  IP: Logged Sean McKinnon Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1712 From: Peabody Massachusetts Registered: Sep 2000 posted 01-15-2011 07:41 PM                        quote: Manny Knowles I love the term "optical clash" I love the song "radio clash"  |  IP: Logged Tony Bandiera Jr Film God Posts: 3067 From: Moreland Idaho Registered: Apr 2004 posted 01-16-2011 12:49 AM                     quote: Martin Daian Hello Tony, i also have a print of Adams Familly Music Video Clip, is the same of that you have?, i note that the Lt and Rt signals on the optical space both are very wide and looks like exced(sp) the normal size, this will give a bad sound on a solar cell?, will be better readable with reverse scan?, Yes Martin, that is the one and thanks for posting the pic, that is exactly what I am talking about. And it will sound bad on solar cell and worse on reverse scan readers. quote: Martin Daian Is possible to use the Analog Reverse Scan with a white led to read the old silver tracks? or also a exciter lamp will be used on reverse scan systems? White LED may not work well (or cause either way too much or not enough gain) from a reverse scan and why the hell would you want to use an exciter lamp? You would have to construct an incredibly complex light pipe to use an exciter lamp with a reverse scan reader. (Exception was of course the Norelco AAII projectors which had reverse scan optical with an exciter lamp. But the solar cells used were designed to be used with white light.)  |  IP: Logged Eric Robinson Jedi Master Film Handler Posts: 538 From: Santa Rosa, CA Registered: Jan 2005 posted 01-16-2011 08:43 PM                     quote: I have this picture form my Adams Familly Video Clip where the soundtrack are exceded the normall size: OK...that just pisses me off. No matter how precisely you set up your system, it will sound like "ass" (as Joe would say) when these types of trailers are shown. Plus, you might waste your time trying to figure out a problem that is non-existent.  |  IP: Logged Martin Daian Expert Film Handler Posts: 227 From: Montevideo, Uruguay Registered: Jul 2003 posted 01-16-2011 10:42 PM                    "why the hell would you want to use an exciter lamp? [Big Grin] You would have to construct an incredibly complex light pipe to use an exciter lamp with a reverse scan reader" Hello Tony, hehehe, yes i want to adapt a Component Engineering Reverse scan with a white light to read correctlly the standard silver soundtracks, some technicians say that silver soundtracks will not sound better with red light, Cyan will not sound ok with white light so as i have a big collection of old films pre 2000 all with silver tracks i like to read the better possible, i will maintain the old slit lens with the old exciter lamp and old stereo solar cell on my Ernemann X projectors but as everybody know that reverse scan have perfectlly crosstalck separation chanels and better HF response that old slit lenses and old stereo solar cells, i don't know if is true about white light for standard silver tracks instead red light, Thank you, Martin  |  IP: Logged Sam D. Chavez Film God Posts: 2153 From: Martinez, CA USA Registered: Aug 2003 posted 01-16-2011 11:28 PM                       The IR LEDs that came out with the original reverse scan readers output the spectrum of light passed by silver sound tracks. The white light exciter lamps put out a wide spectrum of light but only the IR portion is used by the silver sound tracks. BACP make a reader with interchangeable red or IR LEDs so it is possible to get "white light sound" from a reverse scan reader.  |  IP: Logged Brad Miller Administrator Posts: 17775 From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall) Registered: May 99 posted 01-17-2011 12:09 AM                     And I can vouch that it is nice. Unfortunately you DO have to adjust focus if you interchange the red and IR led, but that's not a fault of the design.  |  IP: Logged Martin Daian Expert Film Handler Posts: 227 From: Montevideo, Uruguay Registered: Jul 2003 posted 01-17-2011 02:34 PM                    Dear Sam and Dear Brad, Thank you for the information, is true that the IR light gives better sound quality readance in Standard Silver tracks instead the late Red light commonlly used today? or is the same quality and i am concerned about a differece of sound that not exist? about to adjust the focus of the reader when change the led from IR to Visible Red or viceversa i assume that this is caused for the different spectrum nanometers of light, with Red have one focus distance and with IR other focus? Thank you  |  IP: Logged Sam D. Chavez Film God Posts: 2153 From: Martinez, CA USA Registered: Aug 2003 posted 01-17-2011 06:40 PM                       The IR reader will sound a little better with silver tracks. Not a lot of difference on most soundtracks, but if you want the best possible sound on silver tracks, a reverse scan reader with an IR LED is the best choice.  |  IP: Logged Steve Guttag We forgot the crackers Gromit!!! Posts: 12814 From: Annapolis, MD Registered: Dec 1999 posted 01-17-2011 07:47 PM                     It really depends on the track and the Crossmod distortion. I've found many '80s and '90s tracks to sound HORRIBLE with red-light readers. It isn't that you don't have sound...it is like the amplifier is clipping or something...very harsh. Which might give some people the wrong impression that those tracks were just inherently noisier or not mixed as well. Note, when switching between IR and visible red, there is a significant focus readjustment due to the difference in the index of refraction between the two wavelengths. -Steve  |  IP: Logged Martin Daian Expert Film Handler Posts: 227 From: Montevideo, Uruguay Registered: Jul 2003 posted 01-17-2011 09:20 PM                    Hello again, Thank you Sam and Thank you Steve, Martin  |  IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

Printer-friendly view of this topic

Hop To: Select a Forum: Category: Operations -------------------- Digital Cinema Forum Film Handlers' Forum Large Format Forum Ground Level Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets Category: Community -------------------- Film-Yak Film Handlers' Movie Reviews The Afterlife Bob Maar's Joke-A-Thon Category: Classified -------------------- Equipment and Supplies Wanted/For Sale Help Wanted/Seeking Employment Category: System -------------------- Software Beta Testing Forum

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.