Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Converting SA10s into CP45s?

   
Author Topic: Converting SA10s into CP45s?
Andres Briano
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 162
From: Buenos Aires, Argentina
Registered: Jan 2008


 - posted 01-31-2011 09:44 AM      Profile for Andres Briano   Author's Homepage   Email Andres Briano   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Hiya crazy kids,
Here´s a crazy idea: can a SA10 be converted into a CP45? I find myself having to jump over piles of SA10s every time I go into my office. They are useless (and too big for paperweights) as you know. So, why not try to make something useful out of them?

Can this be done? Has anyone tried it out? What is necessary? I´m all ears!

Andrés

 |  IP: Logged

Dave Macaulay
Film God

Posts: 2321
From: Toronto, Canada
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 02-02-2011 07:15 AM      Profile for Dave Macaulay   Email Dave Macaulay   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Sure!
Just get all the (discontinued and unavailable) boards for a CP45, plus all the other assorted stuff and hardware, then jam it all into the SA10 case.
Have fun.

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 02-02-2011 08:18 AM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Some of the early SA10s had all of the parts stuffed on the In/out board but later ones did not. I believe the motherboard (rear) is different. The metal work on the rear will also hinder you as you will be missing the openings for things like the optical sound input.

You'll be missing the NR card (probably the priciest thing in the CP45).

The button panel is missing all of its switches since the ones that are there (two) are not momentaries. The front panel is lacking the cutouts for the remaining switches. You will be missing the volume control too.

And just think...once you are done...you are left with Dolby's worst processor of all time (for cinema)...the mediocre CP45.

I say...why bother? It is a bad investment in time and resources. If it has parts that can be used in CP45s...better to part them out for folks that need CP45 parts and also to keep SA10s going that are still installed.

-Steve

 |  IP: Logged

Louis Bornwasser
Film God

Posts: 4441
From: prospect ky usa
Registered: Mar 2005


 - posted 02-02-2011 10:49 AM      Profile for Louis Bornwasser   Author's Homepage   Email Louis Bornwasser   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I've got lots of (brand new) 222sr/a's, so that part is not an issue. Louis

 |  IP: Logged

Andres Briano
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 162
From: Buenos Aires, Argentina
Registered: Jan 2008


 - posted 02-02-2011 01:44 PM      Profile for Andres Briano   Author's Homepage   Email Andres Briano   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Steve,
Whay can I say, except thanks for such a complete reply. You´ve gone above and beyond, as usual. I agree that it is most certainly a waste of resources. The reason why I´m taking those out is because I have been installing CP750s.

Louis,
On-topic: I´ll PM you regarding the cost of those CAT222s.

Off-topic: can you believe that in a couple of days it´ll be 3 years since Glenn passed away?? I miss him. This company has turned into an ugly place to work without him.

[Frown]

Andrés

 |  IP: Logged

Louis Bornwasser
Film God

Posts: 4441
From: prospect ky usa
Registered: Mar 2005


 - posted 02-02-2011 02:05 PM      Profile for Louis Bornwasser   Author's Homepage   Email Louis Bornwasser   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Amen! Louis

 |  IP: Logged

Sam D. Chavez
Film God

Posts: 2153
From: Martinez, CA USA
Registered: Aug 2003


 - posted 02-02-2011 10:36 PM      Profile for Sam D. Chavez   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The company would have gone the same way either way.

Maybe it's lucky Glenn is not around to see it.

 |  IP: Logged

Andres Briano
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 162
From: Buenos Aires, Argentina
Registered: Jan 2008


 - posted 02-08-2011 07:15 AM      Profile for Andres Briano   Author's Homepage   Email Andres Briano   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Sam: You are surely right. However I can tell you from the inside that Glenn´s passing contributed to this place becoming uglier.
In any event, I believe I was feeling sorry for myself, and not him. You see, there is not that many people (here at least) that miss him. I know Louis does and there is comfort in numbers.

[Frown] [thumbsup]

BTW, today is the third anniversary of his death.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)  
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.