my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » 35mm projector questions (Page 1)

This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2

Author Topic: 35mm projector questions William Wells Film Handler Posts: 6 From: Nipomo, California, USA Registered: Oct 2013 posted 11-04-2013 10:53 AM                     Hello all, I recently bought a portable ZENIT 35mm projector, and had a couple of questions. I'm coming over from 16mm film, but it seems like there are a few more steps to running 35mm... I bought a 35mm print of 2001: A Space Odyssey the other day, and when I unboxed it I noticed it had magnetic tracks, which make me think it also has CS perfs. Is there any way to tell? Also, is anyone familiar enough with the ZENIT portable projectors to know whether they are 1. safe to run a mag print on and 2. safe for CS perforations? Thanks in advance for any help. I really appreciate it!  |  IP: Logged Sam D. Chavez Film God Posts: 2153 From: Martinez, CA USA Registered: Aug 2003 posted 11-04-2013 11:03 AM                       Best way to tell about the sprockets would be to take a closeup picture of each of them and post them here. Also of the projector. I have not heard of this projector, but others probably have.  |  IP: Logged Stephen Furley Film God Posts: 3059 From: Coulsdon, Croydon, England Registered: May 2002 posted 11-04-2013 11:09 AM                     How many mag stripes does it have? Four was normal for 35 mm, but one and three were also used, but not common. Does it also have a narrow optical stripe next to one of the mag stripes? For a film of this date I would expect that it does. CS perfs are easy to recognise; they are almost square, while normal KS ones are rectangular. compare it with some normal 35 mm film, either motion picture, or even some still film. If you're not sure then post a scan or a photograph of a few perfs and we can tell you for sure. I don't know the Zenit, but I assume that it cannot run magnetic sound; very few portable machines could; I only ever saw one. If it cannot then it may, or may not, have sprockets with teeth which can be used with CS perfs; I think it is more likely that it does not, but I can't be sure without seeing them. If they are not suitable then they would damage the print if you tried to run it. The other possible problem is that anything which the print comes into contact with, or close to, including projector parts and spools, splicers etc., must not be magnetised. All steel parts should be de-magnetised before running a mag print.  |  IP: Logged Jim Henk Master Film Handler Posts: 364 From: San Diego, CA Registered: Feb 2006 posted 11-04-2013 11:13 AM                     Also, are there any mag prints of 2001 left without VS? Did the print smell like salad dressing when you unboxed it? One of the consequences of Vinegar Syndrome is that the print can shrink far enough down to make a formerly projectable print into a smelly unprojectable boat anchor.  |  IP: Logged Leo Enticknap Film God Posts: 7474 From: Loma Linda, CA Registered: Jul 2000 posted 11-04-2013 11:54 AM                        Assuming that the perforations are not Fox holes, could this be a magoptical print? Annyoingly I can't find any photo of one on Google Images, and so can't point you to an image. If so, it'll run on your machine and you'll hear some audio (albeit poor quality and mono), but oxide is likely to shed like mad, and keeping the film path clean will be a never-ending job. Also, if the image on your print has not faded to a reddish/pinkish hue (e.g. if the blacks of outer space still look really black, and not dark pink), you have a dye-transfer, or imbibition (IB) print made using the Technicolor process. These are extremely rare and valuable, precisely because they don't fade, and are real collectors' items.  |  IP: Logged William Wells Film Handler Posts: 6 From: Nipomo, California, USA Registered: Oct 2013 posted 11-04-2013 12:08 PM                     OK, so I took some pictures of the print and have some pictures saved of the projector, but when I try to post them it says I can't link to outside images? How do I post images here? In the meantime, here's the Photobucket album: http://s1238.photobucket.com/user/ww123-2008/library/ZENIT%20Projector In any case, it does appear to be mono optical/mag 4 track. It also has the CS perfs, as I figured. I asked the seller of the projector if it would damage the mag-portion of the print playing it back on the projector and apparently it is safe, I just wanted an unbiased second opinion. I'm still at a loss as to whether the projector will play CS perfs. If it has the KS sprockets, is there any way to change it over to CS (without an incredible amount of time/effort/money)? As far as VS, it is not present on this film (tested with my nose and AD strips - passed on both counts). Would Filmrenew or Filmguard help the mag strips not decompose/flake as they run through the film path, or is it pretty much a lost cause keeping them from flaking? Thanks so much for all the answers so far. I really appreciate the help! Edit: Also, I forgot to mention - not a Tech print. The Discovery is floating in the deep "crimson" of space...  |  IP: Logged Leo Enticknap Film God Posts: 7474 From: Loma Linda, CA Registered: Jul 2000 posted 11-04-2013 02:13 PM                        Filmguard would definitely help keep oxide shedding under control, in my experience. I also noticed from your pic of the leader that there is a bit of shrinkage-caused warping. Doesn't look too bad from what I can see, but FG also helps reduce the picture wobble and focus issues that this can cause. In fact, for projecting older acetate prints, FG is an all round good idea. If you can find some Fox hole sprockets for your projector (you'd need a complete set - feed, intermittent and pay-out), and if swapping them out doesn't necessitate major surgery to the projector, then that's all you should need to do (though slight shutter re-timing might be needed afterwards). How possible this is depends on if you can get hold of the sprockets in the first place (were they ever made for this model?), and how difficult they are to fit. That depends on the design of the projector. For example, on a Cinemeccanica Vic 5, one Allen key and 20 minutes or so is all you need to swap a complete set of sprockets. On an FP-20, in constrast, simply replacing the intermittent sprocket requires major disassembly and, the one time I had to do it, it took me 2-3 hours. I've never seen or worked with your model, and so couldn't say.  |  IP: Logged Dick Prather Master Film Handler Posts: 259 From: Portland, OR, USA Registered: Feb 2002 posted 11-04-2013 02:15 PM                     If it is a Zenith projector it is from the 30's or 40's and was a used for portable use. Most of them being silent machines. I would not run any magnetic film on it. I also doubt if any c/s sprockets were made for a Zenith and if not could damage your print. Pictures would be nice to make sure what machine it is. If your 2001 has all 4 tracks it will have c/s perfs and should be very faded if not smelling. It would sound great if you can fine someone with a magnetic set up assuming the tracks are still good. Too bad you don't live near Portland, OR as I have mag all set up. Dick  |  IP: Logged Rick Raskin Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1100 From: Manassas Virginia Registered: Jan 2003 posted 11-04-2013 02:27 PM                     Take a piece of leader and see if it fits on the sprockets. Fox sprocket holes should fit snugly if you have CS sprockets. If you have KS then they won't fit. It would help to see a close up picture of your machine's sprockets.  |  IP: Logged William Wells Film Handler Posts: 6 From: Nipomo, California, USA Registered: Oct 2013 posted 11-04-2013 02:31 PM                     Here's some more info on the projector from the original seller email: "Not sure if I mentioned this but it will include a visible red reader, mono sound. We’ll also include a few lenses." Is this the right company? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Konvas As far as the sprockets, I'll look into them and see if they can be replaced if they wind up not being CS sprockets. As far as the leader, both head and tail are horrible Fiesta leader (as it's called over on 16mmfilmtalk), so they will be replaced. Any sources for new polyester leader? I'll also be applying some Filmrenew, followed by some Filmguard just to be safe. Hopefully those in combination will keep the oxide shedding under control. As far as running the prints on a mag projector, I'll be going up to Portland in mid-December - if the offer still stands I'd love to take you up on it! Edit: I haven't received the projector yet (it's with UPS right now - I should have it by sometime mid-week) but wanted to get all the details ironed out before it got here... 2nd Edit: Just found out that the Zenit projector is basically a Zeiss Jena TK35 clone (which makes sense, considering the Russians got a bunch of the Zeiss patents after WWII). Anyway, I thought I'd add that tip to see if it helps anybody.  |  IP: Logged Marin Zorica Jedi Master Film Handler Posts: 671 From: Biograd na Moru, Croatia Registered: May 2003 posted 11-04-2013 05:03 PM                     That is russian made MOSKINAP projector, i don't think they did made it under name ZENIT, but maybe depending where did they export. I had some sets converted to red cyan reader for analog sound, because they were common in schools and similar institutions here, and hence some were used in small open air venues. But, don't screen 35mm 2001 on it, it will damage they perforation, and probably since it's all normal metal it could damage magnetic track on film, which, in you're case it is so rare to find 2001 on 35mm (i would kill to get print like that ). Back to projector, yes it's Zeiss TK35 clone to say (even some doubt that russian variant is older???). But it was very poor made, soundhead was awfull and so on....i think that is probably from 1960's. Check does it have aperture plates, some older ne including mine at warehouse has only 1:1,37 fixed mask on it.  |  IP: Logged William Wells Film Handler Posts: 6 From: Nipomo, California, USA Registered: Oct 2013 posted 11-04-2013 05:16 PM                     Ah, very interesting. When I googled "Moskinap," this is what I found about the ZENIT brand: "In total approximately 3000 cameras were sold by MKA in the mid 1990's most having been made by ZENIT a company that had better quality control than Moskinap, and manufactured the Krasnogorsk-3 camera. Strangely enough this would have made MKA the largest new motion picture camera dealer in the world for the 1990's." I'll check on the film plates. As far as I know, it has a standard mask on it, but it will work with a Cinemascope lens...  |  IP: Logged Mark Gulbrandsen Resident Trollmaster Posts: 16657 From: Music City Registered: Jun 99 posted 11-04-2013 06:53 PM                     I have a brand new pair of those still in the crates in my storage locker. Also have quite a few spare parts for them. I ran one of them for a few months at home on and off and they didn't seem to damage film at all. Mine have Cinamascope sprockets. This set does not have magazines but the take up is all gear driven and they are 5/16" shafts. Came with same pedestals as yours, an adjustable voltage regulator transformer and the Russian solid state amplifier. They are a copy of an Ziess portable as Marin says.  |  IP: Logged William Wells Film Handler Posts: 6 From: Nipomo, California, USA Registered: Oct 2013 posted 11-04-2013 09:03 PM                     Oh, exciting! That means mine has a good chance of having CS sprockets. Also, it has a good chance of being gentle to some extent on the film. Cool! Thanks for the info! Hey, if mine winds up not having CS sprockets, would you be interested in selling me the sprockets (I could trade you mine plus some cash or something)?  |  IP: Logged Mark Gulbrandsen Resident Trollmaster Posts: 16657 From: Music City Registered: Jun 99 posted 11-04-2013 09:06 PM                     No, but I'd trade the projectors for something else. Personally, they are just a conversation piece.  |  IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2

Printer-friendly view of this topic

Hop To: Select a Forum: Category: Operations -------------------- Digital Cinema Forum Film Handlers' Forum Large Format Forum Ground Level Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets Category: Community -------------------- Film-Yak Film Handlers' Movie Reviews The Afterlife Bob Maar's Joke-A-Thon Category: Classified -------------------- Equipment and Supplies Wanted/For Sale Help Wanted/Seeking Employment Category: System -------------------- Software Beta Testing Forum

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.