my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Simplex XL Intermittents ?

Author Topic: Simplex XL Intermittents ? Steve Matz Jedi Master Film Handler Posts: 672 From: Billings, Montana, USA Registered: Sep 2003 posted 01-23-2014 05:46 PM                     Has anybody ever had or seen the Hi-speed XL Intermittent listed in their Parts book as G-4126. In probably 30 years of Asking projectionists this; none have said they ever had any anything but the Standard OEM G-4312 in their Projectors, Many didn't even know that Simplex even made such an intermittent and listed it in their Parts Manual. I even checked years back with the 2 Denver based Parts Houses(ACME was one) and they said they had never ever had one in stock and weren't even sure that they were ever made or avaliable even though it was listed in the parts book with an exploded drawing of all the parts. The only part that is the same as the STD Intermittent is the P-1577 Starwheel. The Cam for the STD is G1837 (G4131 Hi-Speed) Intermittent sprocket is even different G-2330 STD (G-4148 Hi-Speed) Main Drive Shaft & Gear G-1836 STD (G-4128 Hi-Speed) The Main Drive Gear shows the same number on Both Units G-1828 But shows 2 different Flywheels G-1830 STD (G-4192 Hi-Speed) Supposedly this intermittent had a faster pull down rate for better illumination but that is speculation. I would just like to know if it was ever Made and maybe pulled out of Service because of Problems,etc. It seems strange they would have kept it in the Parts Ordering Book if they never were going to be able to supply them....  |  IP: Logged Mark Gulbrandsen Resident Trollmaster Posts: 16657 From: Music City Registered: Jun 99 posted 01-24-2014 09:05 AM                     I installed some over the years. Back in the midwest I had several drive ins that only had single phase power. Then, it was the only way to increase screen brightness. They ran fine with Estar Film and produced an awesome image. There were lots of probems with them running acetate film and with cement splices because of the extreme 5 to 1 acceleration on pull down. But this was before.... Once Strong Switching rectifiers came on scene I would have simply paralleled two small units and ran a 4kw lamp. Parralell rectifiers need to be perfectly balanced and with the continous adjustmet current level they had it was a cinch to do.  |  IP: Logged Dave Macaulay Film God Posts: 2321 From: Toronto, Canada Registered: Apr 2001 posted 01-24-2014 09:06 AM                     Yes it existed. The mechanism was quite complicated compared to a standard Geneva, service life not great, actual screen brightness advantage not overwhelming, and cost - either new or for a rebuild - high: you would likely save money replacing a worn one with a new standard unit and shutter. I don't think Simplex sold a lot of them: there were an awful lot of CC dual-shutter Century projectors for every XL high speed shutter version. I believe both were basically meant for drive-in use. The HSS Simplex would theoretically give you better light distribution without the centre brightening effect of the CC.  |  IP: Logged Sam D. Chavez Film God Posts: 2153 From: Martinez, CA USA Registered: Aug 2003 posted 01-24-2014 10:30 AM                       I ran and serviced the high speed movement. Brighter of course as the math would show and the reduced size of the shutter blades which looked a bit like a bow tie. I'd guess most DI's with XL's were high speed movements. Damned noisy to live with for the operator. I'm sure there was more that could have been done noise wise as every once in a while you would come to a quiet patch of film and then it would go back to being noisy. Never got a chance to figure out why.  |  IP: Logged Gordon McLeod Film God Posts: 9532 From: Toronto Ontario Canada Registered: Jun 99 posted 01-24-2014 11:04 AM                     Phillips also offered a high speed movement option for the FP7 called the super fp7 The massive drum shutter has two very small blades provided a sizeable increase in light but very noisey and rather hard on prints  |  IP: Logged Robert Koch Film Handler Posts: 93 From: Williams Ca USA Registered: Apr 2006 posted 01-24-2014 04:08 PM                     In 1966 I installed one of these in a new drive in, in, of all places, Anchorage AK,land of the midnite sun. As a new installation I had nothing to compare it with. All I remember, as Sam stated, it was noisier than hell.  |  IP: Logged Dick Prather Master Film Handler Posts: 259 From: Portland, OR, USA Registered: Feb 2002 posted 01-24-2014 04:49 PM                     I rebuilt several of them. They were noisy like a cam pin noise even when properly adjusted. Mainly used in drive-in's to get more light with smaller shutter blade width. Parts wore out faster as there were more moving parts and a light weight sprocket. Wolk used to rebush them for standard parts. Dick  |  IP: Logged Gordon McLeod Film God Posts: 9532 From: Toronto Ontario Canada Registered: Jun 99 posted 01-24-2014 05:25 PM                     Tommy Hoyt in toronto (who invented the magnetic takeup and a peerless magnarc carbon changer) built many hi speed movements and did a lot of telecine movements as well  |  IP: Logged Mark Gulbrandsen Resident Trollmaster Posts: 16657 From: Music City Registered: Jun 99 posted 01-24-2014 06:34 PM                     Gord.... Do you have any pictures of the Peerless Carbon changer? I've only seen Jet Arcs with auto carbon changer on them... Mark  |  IP: Logged Joe Elliott Master Film Handler Posts: 497 From: Port Orange, Fl USA Registered: Oct 2006 posted 01-24-2014 06:53 PM                     One of our techs has a tattoo of the parts breakdown diagram of a high speed intermittent. It doesn't show the part numbers though . . .  |  IP: Logged Louis Bornwasser Film God Posts: 4441 From: prospect ky usa Registered: Mar 2005 posted 01-24-2014 10:02 PM                        I only just removed them. Still have one or two that we didn't convert to "normal". Louis  |  IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

Printer-friendly view of this topic

Hop To: Select a Forum: Category: Operations -------------------- Digital Cinema Forum Film Handlers' Forum Large Format Forum Ground Level Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets Category: Community -------------------- Film-Yak Film Handlers' Movie Reviews The Afterlife Bob Maar's Joke-A-Thon Category: Classified -------------------- Equipment and Supplies Wanted/For Sale Help Wanted/Seeking Employment Category: System -------------------- Software Beta Testing Forum

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.