my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » 35mm "Judge" Printing Error (Page 1)

This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2

Author Topic: 35mm "Judge" Printing Error Jim Cassedy Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1661 From: San Francisco, CA Registered: Dec 2006 posted 10-13-2014 10:47 AM                     Earlier this week, I did a special 35mm screening of "The Judge". (Ironically, some of the people attending were actually judges!) It was a change-over show. Almost everything was fine until the last reel. As the credits were rolling, it suddenly looked like someone was playing with the framing knob. First they began to move down, then up, than half-way down again before they came to rest. Everything from that point on (Including the WB logo & ratings tag) was out of frame. The image was "off" by about perfsworth. It was a new "lab fresh" print, & there were no splices in the credits. Im guessing that either the negative or the print stock slipped in the printer when they were making the print. ALSO- - Reel 3 was printed SLIGHTLY out of frame. The frame line wasn't exactly where it was supposed to be, so I had to do some minor re-framing when I did the change-over. Then, I had to re-frame back a bit when I went to the next reel on that machine. (Reel 5) So "3" had some sort of error too. It wasn't too bad- - just a bit of black frame-line at the bottom of the screen that wasn't there on any of the other reels. Examining the print after the show, I could see the FL wasn't printed exactly where it shouldda been. (To be technically accurate: the ENTIRE FRAME wasn't where it should have been. So that meant the frame-lines were off too) Unfortunately, I didn't have my camera or camera-phone with me, or I'd have some pix to show. I guess good lab talent & QC are disappearing, or maybe "that ship has already sailed" - - - Anybody else running "The Judge" in 35mm? I'm wondering if all the prints are this way, or only mine. (Which is probably the case) I assume the DCP's are OK.  |  IP: Logged Steve Matz Jedi Master Film Handler Posts: 672 From: Billings, Montana, USA Registered: Sep 2003 posted 10-13-2014 12:19 PM                     I have some 35mm/16mm Reduction Prints that had Pin Registration Slippage. It happens every so often, even on the Best Made Printers. That error should have been caught though and reprinted. Pretty sloppy Lab Work  |  IP: Logged Julian Antos Film Handler Posts: 76 From: Chicago, IL, USA Registered: Nov 2009 posted 10-13-2014 12:42 PM                     Jim, was there any indication of where the print was struck?  |  IP: Logged Jim Cassedy Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1661 From: San Francisco, CA Registered: Dec 2006 posted 10-15-2014 10:25 AM                     Well, Julian, I was able to get a look at the print box before it got shipped out. It was shipped from the Technicolor Distribution center in Ontario, CA There was a also a label on the box that had the 'bogus' film title ("Search for Truth") & the words "Deluxe - - Warner Brothers" Now here's where it gets interesting - - - - - - - - The film leaders had lab labels that looked like this: At first I thought maybe the print came from Ontario CANANDA, and not CA. But then I had a quick flashback to my high-school level French and realized the misspelled label was not French, but most likely Spanish. I can't recall ever seeing a lab-label like this before. (Unless of course I was running a foreign film festival and the prints were made outside the USA) So who knows where this print came from? ? ? Perhaps Deluxe is now using labs in Mexico? (Or Spain?)  |  IP: Logged Steve Matz Jedi Master Film Handler Posts: 672 From: Billings, Montana, USA Registered: Sep 2003 posted 10-15-2014 05:30 PM                     quote: Jim Cassedy It was a new "lab fresh" print, & there were no splices in the credits. I doubt it was printed in California; Both Technicolor and Deluxe had their AUCTIONS in June; I even bought an old MAIER HANCOCK Hot Splicer from Deluxe. I didn't think either Company was doing Film processing because they sold a Ton of Equipment...  |  IP: Logged Jim Cassedy Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1661 From: San Francisco, CA Registered: Dec 2006 posted 10-15-2014 10:49 PM                     Then, obviously, there were no splices- - because YOU'VE got their friggn' splicer!  |  IP: Logged Leo Enticknap Film God Posts: 7474 From: Loma Linda, CA Registered: Jul 2000 posted 10-15-2014 11:34 PM                        I believe that FotoKem still offer release printing, but if this print was distributed out of Ontario, I'm guessing south America (maybe Argentina, where there is rumored to be a still operating release printing lab?) for the origin. There is a large airport in Ontario that has very few passenger flights (owing largely to a dispute between the city and LA World Airports, the owner of ONT), but is a UPS hub and one of the largest air freight terminals in the south-western US. A lot of those flights go to and from Latin America.  |  IP: Logged Julian Antos Film Handler Posts: 76 From: Chicago, IL, USA Registered: Nov 2009 posted 10-16-2014 10:05 AM                     Fotokem does indeed do release printing and does a great job. The name of the lab (and the date the print was struck, which is really useful) is always on the head of Fotokem prints so you'll know when you get one.  |  IP: Logged Carsten Kurz Film God Posts: 4340 From: Cologne, NRW, Germany Registered: Aug 2009 posted 10-16-2014 11:07 AM                     Out of curiosity - how would a 'better' lab prevent that kind of issue - would they simply have better machines and maintenance to reduce the probability, or would they have optical QC control scanners (e.g. 'looking' for correctly spaced frame lines) to automatically detect such issues? I guess even the best lab does not have the time/budget to check every single print by human eye? - Carsten  |  IP: Logged Frank Angel Film God Posts: 5305 From: Brooklyn NY USA Registered: Dec 1999 posted 10-16-2014 12:39 PM                        Looking at those 16mm snaps reminds me of a question I had been asking since I ran a 16mm theatre in my dorm in college, but never found an reasonable answer. I understand that when wet splices were the method of splicing, it didn't matter where the frame line fell as the splices were overlapping film, but once tape splices became the norm, why didn't someone revise the standard so that the frame line didn't fall in the center of the sprocket hole. To cut on the frame line (necessary with tape splices) this necessitated cutting across the sprocket hole. This causes the two halved sprockets at the spice to be much weaker than necessary, if the cut would be made somewhere other than on the sprocket hole structure -- ANYplace else would have made for a much stronger splice -- the most intuitive place would have been equidistant between the two sprocket holes. A butt splice made on non-sprocket hole geography would have much less tendency to fold at the joint. Also, whereas I have seen many multiple stripe tracks in 16mm soundtracks on variable area prints (as many as 6), I have never come across a dual stripe track made with a variable density soundtrack like the ones in the pics. How it took Dolby so long to come up with the A system is a mystery. Just looking at those tracks screams LOOK -- Left Channel, Right Channel!  |  IP: Logged Steve Matz Jedi Master Film Handler Posts: 672 From: Billings, Montana, USA Registered: Sep 2003 posted 10-16-2014 03:17 PM                     When I bought and started using this BOLEX BEVEL Splicer I didn't cut through a Sprocket hole. Since the Splicer put Beveled edges on both sides of each film strip,they came together as the original thickness of the film stock and the splice line was so fine it was almost undetectable going through the gate/aperture. I did hundreds of splices with this Bolex and would still use it over the Hercules Buttweld Splicer I bought back in the 70's and paid almost 800 bucks for....  |  IP: Logged Jesse Skeen Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1517 From: Sacramento, CA Registered: Aug 2000 posted 10-16-2014 06:07 PM                     Remember getting a print of "Finding Forrester" that went out of frame within the first few minutes, no splices in that either til I had to cut a few perfs out to fix it.  |  IP: Logged Richard Fowler Film God Posts: 2392 From: Ft. Lauderdale, FL, USA Registered: Jun 2001 posted 10-16-2014 06:13 PM                     Delux has a large lab in Spain which generally turns out excellent prints.  |  IP: Logged Scott Norwood Film God Posts: 8146 From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas) Registered: Jun 99 posted 10-16-2014 06:39 PM                        Even good labs make mistakes sometimes. The difference is that the good ones make fewer mistakes and check prints more carefully to ensure that the bad prints never make it out to the customer. The label above is not from Foto-Kem. Here is a Foto-Kem 35mm label: And here is a Foto-Kem 16mm label:  |  IP: Logged Steve Matz Jedi Master Film Handler Posts: 672 From: Billings, Montana, USA Registered: Sep 2003 posted 10-16-2014 07:44 PM                     In the old days of DELUXE & TECH, where they were only cranking out a few hundred Theatrical Release Prints of a Feature;you would never see that. A competent Printer Operator would double check the run and reprint if necessary.When the Labs started Cranking out thousands of Prints per Feature than you know the Quality control wasn't going to be 100%.If you had this slippage in the Credits;it wouldn't really be an issue(except to a collector) and if it was only one or 2 frames it would probably only be noticeable to a keen eyed Film Person. Still at having to pay something like $1200 or more for a Print, it should be Flawless. Many of These High Speed Optical Printers can Print at a rate of 1200FPM...  |  IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2

Printer-friendly view of this topic

Hop To: Select a Forum: Category: Operations -------------------- Digital Cinema Forum Film Handlers' Forum Large Format Forum Ground Level Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets Category: Community -------------------- Film-Yak Film Handlers' Movie Reviews The Afterlife Bob Maar's Joke-A-Thon Category: Classified -------------------- Equipment and Supplies Wanted/For Sale Help Wanted/Seeking Employment Category: System -------------------- Software Beta Testing Forum

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.