my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » 2001: A Space Odyssey 5/70 print #20011 damage

Author Topic: 2001: A Space Odyssey 5/70 print #20011 damage Jason Metcalfe Expert Film Handler Posts: 134 From: Austin, TX, U.S. Registered: May 2010 posted 10-13-2014 05:35 PM                     Just curious if anyone else had played print #20011 of 2001 from WB, there is a long section of perf damage for the first 17' of the last reel. We played the same print almost exactly a year ago and it definitely hasn't been fixed since then (it has gotten worse however). I guess the studios don't even have people to look after these very rare and expensive prints anymore. Also curious what was done about it, we hand cranked past the damage to avoid making it worse.  |  IP: Logged Marcel Birgelen Film God Posts: 3357 From: Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands Registered: Feb 2012 posted 10-13-2014 06:14 PM                     Did you inform them about the damage last year? I doubt those studios will actually check returned prints for any damage nowadays. Archives and private collectors will most certainly take more care. And can you actually repair perf damage on a 70mm film with mag tracks without entirely replacing the affected section? I would say if you repair it with splicing tape or maybe even perf tape, you will be certainly covering the mag tracks with it...  |  IP: Logged Jason Metcalfe Expert Film Handler Posts: 134 From: Austin, TX, U.S. Registered: May 2010 posted 10-13-2014 07:53 PM                     Yeah, and we just sent them another message. Actually this print has a DTS track, recentish reprint.  |  IP: Logged Monte L Fullmer Film God Posts: 8367 From: Nampa, Idaho, USA Registered: Nov 2004 posted 10-13-2014 09:24 PM                     Not too difficult to repair that kind of damage by yourself esp where there is no mag track to worry about... ! Done my fair share of sprocket hole damage repairs and it all came out okey ..  |  IP: Logged Jason Metcalfe Expert Film Handler Posts: 134 From: Austin, TX, U.S. Registered: May 2010 posted 10-15-2014 04:45 PM                     When we are working on prints for our archive we do this type of repair, but it's a pretty long section, and 70mm, and honestly I don't feel like we should be held responsible for doing this. Is that unreasonable?  |  IP: Logged Leo Enticknap Film God Posts: 7474 From: Loma Linda, CA Registered: Jul 2000 posted 10-15-2014 04:52 PM                        It's completely reasonable. Given the amount you'll have paid for the shipping of that print alone (let alone the actual booking cost), you have every right to expect a print that is playable without excessive repairs being needed. Resplicing a few of the heads and tails, OK, but repairing dozens of feet of perfs? A working release print is not an archival preservation element and it's not reasonable for studios to ship it in that state (unless by prior negotiation, e.g. we know this print is damaged, and so we'll discount the booking fee if you do repairs).  |  IP: Logged Jason Metcalfe Expert Film Handler Posts: 134 From: Austin, TX, U.S. Registered: May 2010 posted 10-15-2014 10:11 PM                     Leo, thanks for that. You've made a really good point that I didn't even think about. Really I'm just frustrated that no one looked at this print for a year between our bookings, I would expect that from some of the depots that are basically print graveyards in warehouses but I usually expect better from this archive  |  IP: Logged Brad Miller Administrator Posts: 17775 From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall) Registered: May 99 posted 10-16-2014 12:54 AM                     It's highly doubtful you were the last theater to play that print. It is also entirely possible the damage happened on the final run of the previous theater, whether they knew they did the damage or not. Even going back 20 years, the depots did not have any sort of proper inspection for 70mm. They absolutely don't today. Honestly the two reels you ran for me last week when I visited I didn't find in very good condition at all. Way too much dirt and far too many scratches. I would've rejected the print. 70mm is no good as a showoff format if it is worn. It defeats the purpose.  |  IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

Printer-friendly view of this topic

Hop To: Select a Forum: Category: Operations -------------------- Digital Cinema Forum Film Handlers' Forum Large Format Forum Ground Level Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets Category: Community -------------------- Film-Yak Film Handlers' Movie Reviews The Afterlife Bob Maar's Joke-A-Thon Category: Classified -------------------- Equipment and Supplies Wanted/For Sale Help Wanted/Seeking Employment Category: System -------------------- Software Beta Testing Forum

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.