my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » last 35mm release? (Page 1)

This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2

Author Topic: last 35mm release? Carsten Kurz Film God Posts: 4340 From: Cologne, NRW, Germany Registered: Aug 2009 posted 06-18-2015 08:45 AM                     I haven't seen this covered here: Are there still 35mm releases now? Which is the last one you heard about/saw yourself? Which country? - Carsten  |  IP: Logged Leo Enticknap Film God Posts: 7474 From: Loma Linda, CA Registered: Jul 2000 posted 06-18-2015 09:59 AM                        The definition of "last" will be quite tricky to pin down. The Nolans, P.T. Andersons and Tarantinos of this world will probably try to continue "vanity publishing" on film until such time as FotoKem has to throw in the towel (which I'm guessing will be when EK, or a manufacturer of an essential chemical, does so). But these projects can't be characterized as mainstream releases, any more than 180-gram rerelease pressings of classic vinyl albums and sold to collectors at $50 each can be. If by "last release" we mean a routine studio movie, whose director is not insisting on a 35mm release to massage his or her ego but whose distributor is making a few prints to enable it to play in the few remaining multiplexes that haven't converted (not because anyone specifically wants to see it on film), then it should be reasonably obvious when that moment comes.  |  IP: Logged Jim Cassedy Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1661 From: San Francisco, CA Registered: Dec 2006 posted 06-18-2015 10:08 AM                     Carsten- As I mentioned somewhere in another thread recently, I'm often shipped 35mm 'back up' prints for some of the big press or studio screenings I'm involved with. Last two 35mm prints I got were for the new "Mad Max" flick, & "San Andreas" I don't know how widely the studios are distributing the 35mm prints to theaters, but apparently they are still striking a small number of them. Last year I had a situation where a failed ICP board threatened a number of "Academy Screenings", where films are screened for some of the people who wind up voting for the Academy Awards. After first being told there were ' absolutely no 35mm prints' available, after a few phone calls by someone at The Academy, 35mm prints for all but one were magically 'found' and sent to us for the screenings. I was told at the time that these were 'studio prints' and that they could NOT, under any circumstances, be plattered. I don't have platters in that booth anyway so that wasn't really an issue.  |  IP: Logged Carsten Kurz Film God Posts: 4340 From: Cologne, NRW, Germany Registered: Aug 2009 posted 06-18-2015 10:14 AM                     Oh yes, I remember that MadMax frame in the aspect ratio thread. But, I guess I meant 'for ordinary cinemas'. Certainly, that MadMax print is still an interesting piece. I wondering how much it costs to create these single/small quantity prints? Will they be laser printed directly to positive print film? Did you see any lab label or something on it? - Carsten  |  IP: Logged Jim Cassedy Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1661 From: San Francisco, CA Registered: Dec 2006 posted 06-18-2015 10:18 AM                     quote: Carsten Kurz Will they be laser printed directly to positive print film? I remember getting at least one print last year, I can't remember the title, that was shipped directly from the lab, so it had all the paperwork still in the cans, and I know that print was directly 'laser scanned' onto positive print stock, according to the paperwork, and the leaders also had some "Arri-laser" test frames and some other intereresting stuff on them. I should have photographed or scanned them , but sometimes I'm just too damn busy working to have any fun!  |  IP: Logged Leo Enticknap Film God Posts: 7474 From: Loma Linda, CA Registered: Jul 2000 posted 06-18-2015 06:52 PM                        It's certainly possible to laser or CRT film recorder straight out to release print stock. The last time I knew the figures involved (late '00s), it was totally uneconomic to do that, because the cost in machine time was such that even for 2 or 3 prints, it was cheaper to burn an interneg and contact print from that. The recorders themselves cost a quarter of a million, and 4K burning took about a week to do one 2,000 foot reel. Given the cost in machine time that a post house had to charge, therefore, it made sense to spend that time burning an interneg, from which you could then make as many prints as you like on a high speed, one light panel printer. I'm guessing that burning speeds have increased since then (in other words, that the cost of filming out per foot has decreased), as has the cost of release print stock and processing, such that it might now make economic sense to burn one or two prints directly if that's all you're going to need.  |  IP: Logged Scott Norwood Film God Posts: 8146 From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas) Registered: Jun 99 posted 06-18-2015 08:26 PM                        Except that the IN or IP is also useful as a preservation element (which prints are not) and is potentially useful for video transfers or scans in the future. And how does the soundtrack get printed on a laser-to-positive print? If the lab is going to contact-print the soundtrack, anyway, it would make sense to make an IN and then contact-print everything. And this would have the advantage of making an additional print order easy and cheap.  |  IP: Logged Carsten Kurz Film God Posts: 4340 From: Cologne, NRW, Germany Registered: Aug 2009 posted 06-18-2015 08:31 PM                     I guess cost of machine time also has come down considerably, as these devices are not used as much nowadays as they used to be. - Carsten  |  IP: Logged Jim Cassedy Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1661 From: San Francisco, CA Registered: Dec 2006 posted 06-26-2015 02:03 PM                     UPDATE on 35mm: This week I had a 35mm backup of "TED 2" and I'm aware of at least one theater here in San Francisco running a 35mm show print this week. . . . so they're still apparently still shipping some 35mm stuff.  |  IP: Logged Tony Ratcliff Expert Film Handler Posts: 216 From: Madison, IN, USA Registered: Mar 2002 posted 06-26-2015 03:36 PM                     Other current titles still available 35mm: Terminator Genisys Tomorrowland Avengers Inside Out Jurassic World  |  IP: Logged Timothy Eiler Expert Film Handler Posts: 126 From: Litchfield , Minnesota, USA Registered: Mar 2000 posted 07-10-2015 03:31 PM                        San Andreas Furious 7 Pitch perfect 2 inside out  |  IP: Logged Mike Spaeth Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1129 From: Marietta, GA Registered: Jul 2000 posted 07-10-2015 04:43 PM                        Universal and Warner Brothers are still making 35mm prints of *most* of their releases. Disney as well. Fox, Paramount, and Lionsgate are few and far between.  |  IP: Logged Richard Fowler Film God Posts: 2392 From: Ft. Lauderdale, FL, USA Registered: Jun 2001 posted 07-12-2015 02:32 PM                     Cinevator direct to print recorder, developed in Norway,is able to take visual - audio digital files and record at 24 / 25 frames per second on print film. I have handled quite a few of these prints for festivals. The unit has a DLP light engine and LED light source which outputs a 2K image with Dolby Digital, DTS Digital, and stereo analog tracks. Technicolor, Labodigital, Tunnel Post, Delux Spain supplied great prints. The parent company Piql has other hardware for asset preservation.  |  IP: Logged Leo Enticknap Film God Posts: 7474 From: Loma Linda, CA Registered: Jul 2000 posted 07-12-2015 08:18 PM                        How much does the Cinevator variant that can burn release prints in real time directly cost? It would be interesting to figure out from that (e.g. the cost of ownership over the machine's projected useful lifetime, divided into hours of operating time and then, say, 3-4 hours per feature film print including rethreading time) how many prints of a given title you want to make before it becomes more cost effective to burn an interneg and then make the prints by analog contact printing from that. I also note with interest that 2K is enough resolution for Dolby digital audio, and that it cannot print SDDS audio. Interesting that direct burning of release prints is now actually happening. My gut feeling had been that mainstream releasing on film would probably have disappeared altogether before filmout technology had evolved to the point of making that viable. The last I knew, MWA-Nova were thinking about making a variant of their film recorder that could go directly to print stock as well, but there's no mention of it on their website as yet.  |  IP: Logged Richard Fowler Film God Posts: 2392 From: Ft. Lauderdale, FL, USA Registered: Jun 2001 posted 07-13-2015 06:26 AM                     The Cinevator is able to make internegatives for larger runs. One company had a package deal of $1200.00 a 20 minute reel for a single copy run.  |  IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2

Printer-friendly view of this topic

Hop To: Select a Forum: Category: Operations -------------------- Digital Cinema Forum Film Handlers' Forum Large Format Forum Ground Level Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets Category: Community -------------------- Film-Yak Film Handlers' Movie Reviews The Afterlife Bob Maar's Joke-A-Thon Category: Classified -------------------- Equipment and Supplies Wanted/For Sale Help Wanted/Seeking Employment Category: System -------------------- Software Beta Testing Forum

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.