|
|
Author
|
Topic: Low intensity carbon arc rods
|
Sigurd Wik
Film Handler
Posts: 37
From: Bergen, Hordaland, Norway
Registered: Feb 2011
|
posted 08-10-2016 11:36 AM
I'm planning screenings of, and lecture on, very early films. The films will be screened on 35mm on an Ernemann IV with low intensity carbon arc lamphouse, which should be fun. I seem to remember (but I'm not quite sure) that the rod diameter that goes together with 14mm is 9mm. Anyone know if this is right? The reason I ask is that I have a lot of 14mm rods, some 11mm, some 9mm and almost nothing else.
Also, if 9mm is indeed the right diameter, does anyone have any of these? I'm in need of more than I have right now.
Please note that this is the low intensity (LI) version, not the high intensity (HI). Many HI rods are for sale on the bay, but few LI.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jim Cassedy
Phenomenal Film Handler
Posts: 1661
From: San Francisco, CA
Registered: Dec 2006
|
posted 08-10-2016 10:59 PM
quote: Scott Norwood ..is there an actual difference between a "negative" carbon rod and a "positive" one, other than the length and diameter?
Aside from the diameter, the positive carbons were shipped with a slight crater pre-formed on one end, & the the negative carbons had a pre-formed pointed tip, since these were the natural shapes the carbons were going to form as they burned down anyway. If the ends of the new carbons were simply flat (perpendicular) to each other, the light would be somewhat unsteady for a few minutes or so until the crater & core formed naturally.
Also, as I recall, low intensity lamps ALWAYS used 'cored' positives in which the center of the carbon rod was composed of a 'softer' grade of carbon than the outer 'shell'. I think there was also some sort of mineral salts or chemicals added to the core to either improve burning or color temperature. (or both) As I recall, the negative carbons were always 'solid' (not cored), but I could be wrong about that.
| IP: Logged
|
|
Monte L Fullmer
Film God
Posts: 8367
From: Nampa, Idaho, USA
Registered: Nov 2004
|
posted 08-11-2016 03:08 PM
True. The core for both Li and Hi positives was made from a rare earth material that burns away with superb brightness, but real quickly. Thus, the outer shell was constructed to be a harder base to resist rapid burning as with the core.
Why you have the crater with positive rods.
As for the negative, the LI were solid just to stabilize the burn, but when HI carbons came out, they added a lot smaller, rare earth core to aid in with the current flow and to stabilize the arc, but the outer core burnt away faster than the core, why you have the cone.
Hi needed the copper coating, whereas the larger, rotating ones didn't need the copper coating since the DC current contacts were inches away from the tip of the rod.
I do remember striking up 13.6mm rotator positives with 1/2" negatives, and with over 200 DC amps at your disposal on contact, there was almost like an explosion in the lamphouse with you touched the negative into the positive on striking.
Dang, xenon took our fun away.
- Monte
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
Sigurd Wik
Film Handler
Posts: 37
From: Bergen, Hordaland, Norway
Registered: Feb 2011
|
posted 08-11-2016 04:23 PM
Got some news since last post. I'm running on 45V/24A DC. I got a tip that 14mm might be too large for the negative rod, but not certain. Also awaiting answer from CinemaCarbons.com.
I also got this from Dick Prather five years ago on this forum, but none of the V fit within what I have got. Don't know what means for my rod diameter needs, maybe I should ideally have 12/8?
16-20 A, 54-57 V - 10mm pos, 7mm neg 21-32 A, 54-57 V - 12mm pos, 8mm neg 32-42 A, 54-57 V - 13mm pos, 9mm neg 42.52 A, 54-57 V - 14mm pos, 10mm neg
Stephan: That's great. Just to let you know, I'm in some hurry, as the screening is Aug 24. The reason for this is that I was clumsy and a packet of 9mm rods fell to the floor and most of them broke. But I can ship express if necessary.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|